Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"International bedeutende Universalklassifikationen"
  1. Svanberg, M.: Mapping two classification schemes : DDC and SAB (2008) 0.05 
    0.047060672 = product of:
  0.094121344 = sum of:
    0.094121344 = sum of:
      0.05202612 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05202612 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05178292 = queryNorm
          0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
      0.042095225 = weight(_text_:22 in 2151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042095225 = score(doc=2151,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05178292 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2151, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2151)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Most Swedish libraries use a Swedish classification scheme called SAB, but a switch to Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is under consideration. The question of a Swedish switch to DDC was treated as part of a Catalogue Survey, conducted during 2006. Summarising the study, there is a lot to be said for a Swedish switch to DDC. If a switch became reality, mappings between SAB and DDC would play a crucial role as an aid both for librarians and library users. The article describes a project where a DDC arrangement of the Swedish National Bibliography should be achieved through mapping of the captions in the SAB arrangement. The methodology used is described, and problems are discussed. The article includes a comparison of DDC numbers achieved through mapping and manually added DDC numbers in a sample of bibliographic records. Future plans for DDC in Sweden are also discussed.
    Date
    14. 8.2008 11:22:44
  2. Mills, J.: Bibliographic classification (1976) 0.03 
    0.03468408 = product of:
  0.06936816 = sum of:
    0.06936816 = product of:
      0.13873632 = sum of:
        0.13873632 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13873632 = score(doc=1272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 1272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. McIlwaine, I.C.: Universal Bibliographic Control and the quest for a universally acceptable subject arrangement (2010) 0.03 
    0.030037297 = product of:
  0.060074594 = sum of:
    0.060074594 = product of:
      0.12014919 = sum of:
        0.12014919 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12014919 = score(doc=3567,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.5959982 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Achieving widespread agreement on subject organization is a complex task, and a challenge greater than that of creating a standard bibliographic description for international exchange-the goal of Universal Bibliographic Control (UBC). This article traces the history of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), its relationship with other schemes, and opportunities for further collaboration.
  4. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.03 
    0.027453938 = product of:
  0.054907877 = sum of:
    0.054907877 = product of:
      0.109815754 = sum of:
        0.109815754 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109815754 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22
  5. McIlwaine, I.: Knowledge classifications, bibliographic classifications and the Internet (1998) 0.02 
    0.024525348 = product of:
  0.049050696 = sum of:
    0.049050696 = product of:
      0.09810139 = sum of:
        0.09810139 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09810139 = score(doc=63,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The advent of the Internet has intensified problems of classification and nomenclature in a range of disciplines that have been the concern of librarians and scientists for over a century. Biology and Medicine are selected as examples, and the work of specialists both in scientific systematics and taxonomy and in bibliographic classification is examined in order to suggest some solutions to current difficulties in information retrieval
  6. Hjoerland, B.: Arguments for 'the bibliographical paradigm' : some thoughts inspired by the new English edition of the UDC (2007) 0.02 
    0.02252797 = product of:
  0.04505594 = sum of:
    0.04505594 = product of:
      0.09011188 = sum of:
        0.09011188 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09011188 = score(doc=552,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.44699866 = fieldWeight in 552, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=552)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The term 'the bibliographic paradigm' is used in the literature of library and information science, but is a very seldom term and is almost always negatively described. This paper reconsiders this concept. Method. The method is mainly 'analytical'. Empirical data concerning the current state of the UDC-classification system are also presented in order to illuminate the connection between theory and practice. Analysis. The bibliographic paradigm is understood as a perspective in library and information science focusing on documents and information resources, their description, organization, mediation and use. This perspective is examined as one among other metatheories of library and information science and its philosophical assumptions and implications are outlined. Results. The neglect and misunderstanding of 'the bibliographic paradigm' as well as the quality of the new UDC-classification indicate that both the metatheoretical discourses on library and information science and its concrete practice seem to be in a state of crisis.
  7. Svanberg, M.: Dewey in Sweden : leaving SAB after 87 years (2011) 0.02 
    0.021677552 = product of:
  0.043355104 = sum of:
    0.043355104 = product of:
      0.08671021 = sum of:
        0.08671021 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08671021 = score(doc=1804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 1804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1804)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Series
    IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 42
  8. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22: Dewey in the world, the world in Dewey (2004) 0.02 
    0.019609956 = product of:
  0.039219912 = sum of:
    0.039219912 = product of:
      0.078439824 = sum of:
        0.078439824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078439824 = score(doc=2644,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.43256867 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In 2003, OCLC published Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22), in print and Web versions. The changes and updates in the new edition reflect a modern view of knowledge structures and address the general needs of Dewey users. The content of DDC 22 has been shaped by a number of social, geopolitical, and technical trends. The World Wide Web has provided a vehicle for more frequent distribution of updates to the DDC, and a medium for direct communication with Dewey users around the world. In addition to updating the system itself, other strategies are needed to accommodate the needs of the global Dewey user community. Translation of the system is one approach; another is mapping. Mapping terminology to the DDC is a strategy for supporting effective local implementation of the system while maintaining the internal cohesiveness of the DDC. This paper explores the usefulness of mapping terminology from English-language general subject headings lists produced outside the U.S.
    Object
    DDC-22
  9. Kaushik, S.K.: DDC 22 : a practical approach (2004) 0.02 
    0.018562252 = product of:
  0.037124503 = sum of:
    0.037124503 = product of:
      0.07424901 = sum of:
        0.07424901 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07424901 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.
    Content
    1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons
    Object
    DDC-22
  10. Beghtol, C.: Knowledge domains : multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems (1998) 0.02 
    0.018394012 = product of:
  0.036788024 = sum of:
    0.036788024 = product of:
      0.07357605 = sum of:
        0.07357605 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07357605 = score(doc=2028,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic classification systems purport to organize the world of knowledge for information storage and retrieval purposes in libraries and bibliographies, both manual and online. The major systems that have predominated during the 20th century were originally predicated on the academic disciplines. This structural principle is no longer adequate because multidisciplinray knowledge production has overtaken more traditional disciplinary perspectives and produced communities of cooperation whose documents cannot be accomodated in a disciplinary structure. This paper addresses the problems the major classifications face, reports some attempts to revise these systems to accomodate multidisciplinary works more appropriately, and describes some theoretical research perspectives that attempt to reorient classification research toward the pluralistic needs of multidisciplinary knowledge creation and the perspectives of different discourse communities. Traditionally, the primary desiderata of classification systems were mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity. The need to respond to multidisciplinary research may mean that hospitality will replace mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity as the most needed and useful characteristics of classification systems in both theory and practice
  11. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.02 
    0.017539678 = product of:
  0.035079356 = sum of:
    0.035079356 = product of:
      0.07015871 = sum of:
        0.07015871 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07015871 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  12. Scott, M.L.: Dewey Decimal Classification, 22nd edition : a study manual and number building guide (2005) 0.02 
    0.017539678 = product of:
  0.035079356 = sum of:
    0.035079356 = product of:
      0.07015871 = sum of:
        0.07015871 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07015871 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    DDC-22
  13. Heiner-Freiling, M.: DDC Deutsch 22 : formale, terminologische und inhaltliche Aspekte einer deutschen DDC-Ausgabe (2001) 0.02 
    0.017363396 = product of:
  0.03472679 = sum of:
    0.03472679 = product of:
      0.06945358 = sum of:
        0.06945358 = weight(_text_:22 in 6993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06945358 = score(doc=6993,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 6993, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6993)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Es werden die Überlegungen im Zusammenhang mit der Einführung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation im deutschen Sprachraum dargestellt, wobei die künftige deutsche DDC-Ausgabe auf der Basis der 22. Auflage der Original-DDC im Mittelpunkt steht. Dringlich für eine deutsche Ausgabe sind neben Korrekturen und Expansionen für deutsche Sachverhalte, etwa im Bereich der geografischen Hilfstafel, die Schaffung eines deutschen Begriffsinventars für das Instrumentarium der DDC selbst und eine Integration der Terminologie der Schlagwortnormdatei, soweit das mit der Struktur einer Klassifikation vereinbar ist. Daneben kommt der über eine reine Übersetzung hinausgehenden Anpassung der Beispiele und Registereinträge der DDC an die Suchgewohnheiten deutschsprachiger Benutzer eine erhebliche Bedeutung zu.
  14. Dewey, M.: Dewey Decimal Classification and relative index (1989) 0.02 
    0.01734204 = product of:
  0.03468408 = sum of:
    0.03468408 = product of:
      0.06936816 = sum of:
        0.06936816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 7586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06936816 = score(doc=7586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 7586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7586)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 37(1990) S.435-437 (W. Traiser); International classification 17(1990) S.107-108 (M.P. Satija); Cataloging & classification quarterly 10(1990) S.105-108 (K.L. Henderson); Outlook on research libraries 11(1989) S.4-9 (R. Sweeney); International catalogiong & bibliographic control 19, S.46-47 (B. Bankole); BuB 41(1989) S.835f. (H. Vogeler)
  15. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future developments (1994) 0.02 
    0.01734204 = product of:
  0.03468408 = sum of:
    0.03468408 = product of:
      0.06936816 = sum of:
        0.06936816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06936816 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 23(1994) no.5, S.29-33
  16. Hjoerland, B.; Albrechtsen, H.: ¬An analysis of some trends in classification research (1999) 0.02 
    0.015328343 = product of:
  0.030656686 = sum of:
    0.030656686 = product of:
      0.061313372 = sum of:
        0.061313372 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061313372 = score(doc=6391,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper takes a second look at three prevailing main themes in knowledge organization: i) the academic disciplines as the main structural principle; ii) the fiction/non-fiction distinction; and iii) the appropriate unit of analysis in online retrieval systems. The history and origin of bibliographic classification [Dewey, Bliss, Mills, Beghtol] are discussed from the perspective of pragmatist philosophy and social studies of science [Kuhn, Merton, Reich]. Choices of structural principles in different schemes are found to rely on more or less implicit philosophical foundations, ranging from rationalism to pragmatism. It is further shown how the increasing application of faceted structures as basic structural principles in universal classification schemes [DDC, UDC] impose rationalistic principles and structures for knowledge organization which are not in alignment with the development of knowledge in the covered disciplines. Further evidence of rationalism in knowledge organization is the fiction/non-fiction distinction, excluding the important role of artistic resources for, in particular, humanistic research. Finally, for the analysis of appropriate bibliographic unit, it is argued that there is a need to shift towards a semiotic approach, founded on an understanding of intertextuality, rather than applying standard principles of hierarchical decomposition of documents. It is concluded that a change in classification research is needed, founded on a more historical and social understanding of knowledge
  17. Thomas, A.R.: Bibliographic classification : the ideas and achievements of Henry E. Bliss (1997) 0.02 
    0.0151742855 = product of:
  0.030348571 = sum of:
    0.030348571 = product of:
      0.060697142 = sum of:
        0.060697142 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060697142 = score(doc=3748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 3748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  18. Bell, B.L.: ¬The Dewey Decimal Classification system in national bibliographies (1997) 0.02 
    0.0151742855 = product of:
  0.030348571 = sum of:
    0.030348571 = product of:
      0.060697142 = sum of:
        0.060697142 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 24) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060697142 = score(doc=24,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20159319 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 24, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=24)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    I am pleased to be included as part of this workshop. My contribution comes from my research and working with national bibliographies around the world, not from my expertise with the Dewey Decimal Classification system. With that disclaimer, I am ready to share my observations and experience in how national bibliographies and national bibliographic services use the DDC in national bibliographies, including a case study of the making of the Namibia National Bibliography
  19. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01 
    0.014031743 = product of:
  0.028063485 = sum of:
    0.028063485 = product of:
      0.05612697 = sum of:
        0.05612697 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05612697 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  20. Gödert, W.: ¬"Die Welt ist groß - Wir bringen Ordnung in diese Welt" : Das DFG-Projekt DDC Deutsch (2002) 0.01 
    0.014031743 = product of:
  0.028063485 = sum of:
    0.028063485 = product of:
      0.05612697 = sum of:
        0.05612697 = weight(_text_:22 in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05612697 = score(doc=1095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18133497 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05178292 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird die Zielsetzung und die geplante Durchführung des Projektes DDC Deutsch zur Herstellung einer deutschen Version der 22. Ausgabe der Dewey Decimal Classification näher beschrieben. Es werden Gründe für die Durchführung des Vorhabens diskutiert und der erwartete spätere Nutzen beschrieben.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 9
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications