Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

0.13709141 = product of:
  0.27418283 = sum of:
    0.27418283 = sum of:
      0.24117167 = weight(_text_:crm in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24117167 = score(doc=5757,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.6218139 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
      0.033011146 = weight(_text_:22 in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033011146 = score(doc=5757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Cultural heritage institutions are publishing their digital collections over the web as LOD. This is is a new step in the patrimonialization and curatorial processes developed by such institutions. Many of these collections are thematically superimposed and complementary. Frequently, objects in these collections present culturally relevant relationships, such as a book about a painting, or a draft or sketch of a famous painting, etc. LOD technology enables such heritage records to be interlinked, achieving interoperability and adding value to digital collections, thus empowering heritage institutions. An aim of this research is characterizing such culturally relevant relationships and organizing them in a vocabulary. Use cases or examples of relationships between objects suggested by curators or mentioned in literature and in the conceptual models as FRBR/LRM, CIDOC CRM and RiC-CM, were collected and used as examples or inspiration of cultural relevant relationships. Relationships identified are collated and compared for identifying those with the same or similar meaning, synthesized and normalized. A set of thirty-three culturally relevant relationships are identified and formalized as a LOD property vocabulary to be used by digital curators to interlink digital collections. The results presented are provisional and a starting point to be discussed, tested, and enhanced.

Date

4. 3.2020 14:22:41

Object

CIDOC CRM

0.08861213 = product of:
  0.17722426 = sum of:
    0.17722426 = product of:
      0.35444853 = sum of:
        0.35444853 = weight(_text_:crm in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35444853 = score(doc=2247,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.91387606 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The theoretical difficulty underlying gazetteers and time - period thesauri is generally overlooked. Practice demands that they are detailed, exhaustive and universal, but a dumb use may lead to paradoxes of traveling backwards in time, and shamanic - style bi-location. As Zeno's paradox of Achilles and the tortoise, these however suggest a solution that resolves the issues by addressing them from a different perspective. After surveying the most popular among such lists, this presentation will try to provide a theoretical basis by embedding them in 4-dimensional space - time and discretizing their granularity. This will allow relating them to CIDOC CRM, and some examples of mapping will be discussed.

Object

CIDOC CRM

0.08526706 = product of:
  0.17053412 = sum of:
    0.17053412 = product of:
      0.34106824 = sum of:
        0.34106824 = weight(_text_:crm in 2895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34106824 = score(doc=2895,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.8793776 = fieldWeight in 2895, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The article presents a method for automatic semantic indexing of archaeological grey-literature reports using empirical (rule-based) Information Extraction techniques in combination with domain-specific knowledge organization systems. The semantic annotation system (OPTIMA) performs the tasks of Named Entity Recognition, Relation Extraction, Negation Detection, and Word-Sense Disambiguation using hand-crafted rules and terminological resources for associating contextual abstractions with classes of the standard ontology CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM) for cultural heritage and its archaeological extension, CRM-EH. Relation Extraction (RE) performance benefits from a syntactic-based definition of RE patterns derived from domain oriented corpus analysis. The evaluation also shows clear benefit in the use of assistive natural language processing (NLP) modules relating to Word-Sense Disambiguation, Negation Detection, and Noun Phrase Validation, together with controlled thesaurus expansion. The semantic indexing results demonstrate the capacity of rule-based Information Extraction techniques to deliver interoperable semantic abstractions (semantic annotations) with respect to the CIDOC CRM and archaeological thesauri. Major contributions include recognition of relevant entities using shallow parsing NLP techniques driven by a complimentary use of ontological and terminological domain resources and empirical derivation of context-driven RE rules for the recognition of semantic relationships from phrases of unstructured text.

Object

CIDOC-CRM

0.07626518 = product of:
  0.15253036 = sum of:
    0.15253036 = product of:
      0.3050607 = sum of:
        0.3050607 = weight(_text_:crm in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3050607 = score(doc=3965,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.78653926 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper describes recent initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web, including IFLA standards such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) along with the infrastructure that supports them. The FRBR Review Group is currently developing representations of FRAD and the entityrelationship model of FRBR in resource description framework (RDF) applications, using a combination of RDF, RDF Schema (RDFS), Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) and Web Ontology Language (OWL), cross-relating both models where appropriate. The ISBD/XML Task Group is investigating the representation of ISBD in RDF. The IFLA Namespaces project is developing an administrative and technical infrastructure to support such initiatives and encourage uptake of standards by other agencies. The paper describes similar initiatives with related external standards such as RDA - resource description and access, REICAT (the new Italian cataloguing rules) and CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM). The DCMI RDA Task Group is working with the Joint Steering Committee for RDA to develop Semantic Web representations of RDA structural elements, which are aligned with FRBR and FRAD, and controlled metadata content vocabularies. REICAT is also based on FRBR, and an object-oriented version of FRBR has been integrated with CRM, which itself has an RDF representation. CRM was initially based on the metadata needs of the museum community, and is now seeking extension to the archives community with the eventual aim of developing a model common to the main cultural information domains of archives, libraries and museums. The Vocabulary Mapping Framework (VMF) project has developed a Semantic Web tool to automatically generate mappings between metadata models from the information communities, including publishers. The tool is based on several standards, including CRM, FRAD, FRBR, MARC21 and RDA.

Object

CIDOC CRM

0.06029292 = product of:
  0.12058584 = sum of:
    0.12058584 = product of:
      0.24117167 = sum of:
        0.24117167 = weight(_text_:crm in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24117167 = score(doc=5787,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.6218139 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study considers the expressiveness (that is the expressive power or expressivity) of different types of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and discusses its potential to be machine-processable in the context of the Semantic Web. For this purpose, the theoretical foundations of KOS are reviewed based on conceptualizations introduced by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) and the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS); natural language processing techniques are also implemented. Applying a comparative analysis, the dataset comprises a thesaurus (Eurovoc), a subject headings system (LCSH) and a classification scheme (DDC). These are compared with an ontology (CIDOC-CRM) by focusing on how they define and handle concepts and relations. It was observed that LCSH and DDC focus on the formalism of character strings (nomens) rather than on the modelling of semantics; their definition of what constitutes a concept is quite fuzzy, and they comprise a large number of complex concepts. By contrast, thesauri have a coherent definition of what constitutes a concept, and apply a systematic approach to the modelling of relations. Ontologies explicitly define diverse types of relations, and are by their nature machine-processable. The paper concludes that the potential of both the expressiveness and machine processability of each KOS is extensively regulated by its structural rules. It is harder to represent subject headings and classification schemes as semantic networks with nodes and arcs, while thesauri are more suitable for such a representation. In addition, a paradigm shift is revealed which focuses on the modelling of relations between concepts, rather than the concepts themselves.

Object

CIDOC-CRM

0.04514767 = product of:
  0.09029534 = sum of:
    0.09029534 = product of:
      0.270886 = sum of:
        0.270886 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.270886 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41313264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.

0.032248333 = product of:
  0.064496666 = sum of:
    0.064496666 = product of:
      0.19349 = sum of:
        0.19349 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19349 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41313264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.

0.0231078 = product of:
  0.0462156 = sum of:
    0.0462156 = product of:
      0.0924312 = sum of:
        0.0924312 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0924312 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2015 16:08:38

0.019806685 = product of:
  0.03961337 = sum of:
    0.03961337 = product of:
      0.07922674 = sum of:
        0.07922674 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07922674 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

0.019806685 = product of:
  0.03961337 = sum of:
    0.03961337 = product of:
      0.07922674 = sum of:
        0.07922674 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07922674 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 9.2008 19:30:41

0.016505573 = product of:
  0.033011146 = sum of:
    0.033011146 = product of:
      0.06602229 = sum of:
        0.06602229 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06602229 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

0.016505573 = product of:
  0.033011146 = sum of:
    0.033011146 = product of:
      0.06602229 = sum of:
        0.06602229 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06602229 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.014005443 = product of:
  0.028010886 = sum of:
    0.028010886 = product of:
      0.056021772 = sum of:
        0.056021772 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056021772 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.

Date

22. 1.2010 15:06:54

0.014005443 = product of:
  0.028010886 = sum of:
    0.028010886 = product of:
      0.056021772 = sum of:
        0.056021772 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056021772 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.

0.013204457 = product of:
  0.026408914 = sum of:
    0.026408914 = product of:
      0.05281783 = sum of:
        0.05281783 = weight(_text_:22 in 7411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05281783 = score(doc=7411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7411)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7.11.2008 10:40:22

0.013204457 = product of:
  0.026408914 = sum of:
    0.026408914 = product of:
      0.05281783 = sum of:
        0.05281783 = weight(_text_:22 in 541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05281783 = score(doc=541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

26.12.2011 13:22:46

0.013204457 = product of:
  0.026408914 = sum of:
    0.026408914 = product of:
      0.05281783 = sum of:
        0.05281783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05281783 = score(doc=2175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 8.2009 10:35:21

0.013204457 = product of:
  0.026408914 = sum of:
    0.026408914 = product of:
      0.05281783 = sum of:
        0.05281783 = weight(_text_:22 in 2227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05281783 = score(doc=2227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2227)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

7.11.2008 10:40:22

0.011671201 = product of:
  0.023342403 = sum of:
    0.023342403 = product of:
      0.046684805 = sum of:
        0.046684805 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046684805 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.

0.0115539 = product of:
  0.0231078 = sum of:
    0.0231078 = product of:
      0.0462156 = sum of:
        0.0462156 = weight(_text_:22 in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0462156 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

26.12.2011 13:22:27