Search (3065 results, page 1 of 154)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Hohmann, G.: ¬Die Anwendung des CIDOC-CRM für die semantische Wissensrepräsentation in den Kulturwissenschaften (2010) 0.25 
    0.24860221 = product of:
  0.49720442 = sum of:
    0.49720442 = sum of:
      0.45759106 = weight(_text_:crm in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.45759106 = score(doc=4011,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          1.1798089 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
      0.03961337 = weight(_text_:22 in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03961337 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Das CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM) ist eine Ontologie für den Bereich des Kulturellen Erbes, die als ISO 21127 standardisiert ist. Inzwischen liegen auch OWL-DL-Implementationen des CRM vor, die ihren Einsatz auch im Semantic Web ermöglicht. OWL-DL ist eine entscheidbare Untermenge der Web Ontology Language, die vom W3C spezifiziert wurde. Lokale Anwendungsontologien, die ebenfalls in OWL-DL modelliert werden, können über Subklassenbeziehungen mit dem CRM als Referenzontologie verbunden werden. Dadurch wird es automatischen Prozessen ermöglicht, autonom heterogene Daten semantisch zu validieren, zueinander in Bezug zu setzen und Anfragen über verschiedene Datenbestände innerhalb der Wissensdomäne zu verarbeiten und zu beantworten.
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  2. Boeuf, P. le; Doerr, M.: Harmonising CIDOC CRM and FRBR (2007) 0.14 
    0.144703 = product of:
  0.289406 = sum of:
    0.289406 = product of:
      0.578812 = sum of:
        0.578812 = weight(_text_:crm in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.578812 = score(doc=250,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            1.4923533 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
  3. Marcondes, C.H.: Towards a vocabulary to implement culturally relevant relationships between digital collections in heritage institutions (2020) 0.14 
    0.13709141 = product of:
  0.27418283 = sum of:
    0.27418283 = sum of:
      0.24117167 = weight(_text_:crm in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24117167 = score(doc=5757,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.6218139 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
      0.033011146 = weight(_text_:22 in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033011146 = score(doc=5757,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Cultural heritage institutions are publishing their digital collections over the web as LOD. This is is a new step in the patrimonialization and curatorial processes developed by such institutions. Many of these collections are thematically superimposed and complementary. Frequently, objects in these collections present culturally relevant relationships, such as a book about a painting, or a draft or sketch of a famous painting, etc. LOD technology enables such heritage records to be interlinked, achieving interoperability and adding value to digital collections, thus empowering heritage institutions. An aim of this research is characterizing such culturally relevant relationships and organizing them in a vocabulary. Use cases or examples of relationships between objects suggested by curators or mentioned in literature and in the conceptual models as FRBR/LRM, CIDOC CRM and RiC-CM, were collected and used as examples or inspiration of cultural relevant relationships. Relationships identified are collated and compared for identifying those with the same or similar meaning, synthesized and normalized. A set of thirty-three culturally relevant relationships are identified and formalized as a LOD property vocabulary to be used by digital curators to interlink digital collections. The results presented are provisional and a starting point to be discussed, tested, and enhanced.
    Date
    4. 3.2020 14:22:41
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
  4. Lischka, K.: Spurensuche im Datenwust : Data-Mining-Software fahndet nach kriminellen Mitarbeitern, guten Kunden - und bald vielleicht auch nach Terroristen (2002) 0.12 
    0.124301106 = product of:
  0.24860221 = sum of:
    0.24860221 = sum of:
      0.22879553 = weight(_text_:crm in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22879553 = score(doc=1178,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.5899044 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
      0.019806685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019806685 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Ob man als Terrorist einen Anschlag gegen die Vereinigten Staaten plant, als Kassierer Scheine aus der Kasse unterschlägt oder für bestimmte Produkte besonders gerne Geld ausgibt - einen Unterschied macht Data-Mining-Software da nicht. Solche Programme analysieren riesige Daten- mengen und fällen statistische Urteile. Mit diesen Methoden wollen nun die For- scher des "Information Awaren in den Vereinigten Staaten Spuren von Terroristen in den Datenbanken von Behörden und privaten Unternehmen wie Kreditkartenfirmen finden. 200 Millionen Dollar umfasst der Jahresetat für die verschiedenen Forschungsprojekte. Dass solche Software in der Praxis funktioniert, zeigen die steigenden Umsätze der Anbieter so genannter Customer-Relationship-Management-Software. Im vergangenen Jahr ist das Potenzial für analytische CRM-Anwendungen laut dem Marktforschungsinstitut IDC weltweit um 22 Prozent gewachsen, bis zum Jahr 2006 soll es in Deutschland mit einem jährlichen Plus von 14,1 Prozent so weitergehen. Und das trotz schwacher Konjunktur - oder gerade deswegen. Denn ähnlich wie Data-Mining der USRegierung helfen soll, Terroristen zu finden, entscheiden CRM-Programme heute, welche Kunden für eine Firma profitabel sind. Und welche es künftig sein werden, wie Manuela Schnaubelt, Sprecherin des CRM-Anbieters SAP, beschreibt: "Die Kundenbewertung ist ein zentraler Bestandteil des analytischen CRM. Sie ermöglicht es Unternehmen, sich auf die für sie wichtigen und richtigen Kunden zu fokussieren. Darüber hinaus können Firmen mit speziellen Scoring- Verfahren ermitteln, welche Kunden langfristig in welchem Maße zum Unternehmenserfolg beitragen." Die Folgen der Bewertungen sind für die Betroffenen nicht immer positiv: Attraktive Kunden profitieren von individuellen Sonderangeboten und besonderer Zuwendung. Andere hängen vielleicht so lauge in der Warteschleife des Telefonservice, bis die profitableren Kunden abgearbeitet sind. So könnte eine praktische Umsetzung dessen aussehen, was SAP-Spreche-rin Schnaubelt abstrakt beschreibt: "In vielen Unternehmen wird Kundenbewertung mit der klassischen ABC-Analyse durchgeführt, bei der Kunden anhand von Daten wie dem Umsatz kategorisiert werden. A-Kunden als besonders wichtige Kunden werden anders betreut als C-Kunden." Noch näher am geplanten Einsatz von Data-Mining zur Terroristenjagd ist eine Anwendung, die heute viele Firmen erfolgreich nutzen: Sie spüren betrügende Mitarbeiter auf. Werner Sülzer vom großen CRM-Anbieter NCR Teradata beschreibt die Möglichkeiten so: "Heute hinterlässt praktisch jeder Täter - ob Mitarbeiter, Kunde oder Lieferant - Datenspuren bei seinen wirtschaftskriminellen Handlungen. Es muss vorrangig darum gehen, einzelne Spuren zu Handlungsmustern und Täterprofilen zu verdichten. Das gelingt mittels zentraler Datenlager und hoch entwickelter Such- und Analyseinstrumente." Von konkreten Erfolgen sprich: Entlas-sungen krimineller Mitarbeiter-nach Einsatz solcher Programme erzählen Unternehmen nicht gerne. Matthias Wilke von der "Beratungsstelle für Technologiefolgen und Qualifizierung" (BTQ) der Gewerkschaft Verdi weiß von einem Fall 'aus der Schweiz. Dort setzt die Handelskette "Pick Pay" das Programm "Lord Lose Prevention" ein. Zwei Monate nach Einfüh-rung seien Unterschlagungen im Wert von etwa 200 000 Franken ermittelt worden. Das kostete mehr als 50 verdächtige Kassiererinnen und Kassierer den Job.
  5. Krause, S.: CIDOC - Conceptual Reference Model : oder: das Schweizer Taschenmesser für die Museums- und Kulturinformatik (2002) 0.12 
    0.11814951 = product of:
  0.23629902 = sum of:
    0.23629902 = product of:
      0.47259805 = sum of:
        0.47259805 = weight(_text_:crm in 1020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47259805 = score(doc=1020,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            1.2185014 = fieldWeight in 1020, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1020)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dokumentationsaktivitäten waren im Museum lange auf Bestandsverwaltung beschränkt, wobei die Informationen ähnlich behandelt wurden wie bibliographische Informationen. Doch die systematische Sammlung wissenschaftlicher Informationen zu Museumsobjekten unterscheidet sich davon stark. Das CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM) unterstützt diese erweiterten Anforderungen, weil mit ihm komplexe Datenstrukturen in kontrollierter, aber flexibler Weise behandelt werden können. Technisch ist das CIDOC CRM eine Ontologie, die unter dem Paradigma der Objektorientierung speziell für den Museumsbereich erarbeit etwurde. Das CHIOS Projekt versucht derzeit, CIDOC-CRM als ISO-Standard zu etablieren.
  6. LeBoeuf, P.: ¬A strange model named FRBRoo (2012) 0.11 
    0.114397764 = product of:
  0.22879553 = sum of:
    0.22879553 = product of:
      0.45759106 = sum of:
        0.45759106 = weight(_text_:crm in 1904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45759106 = score(doc=1904,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            1.1798089 = fieldWeight in 1904, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1904)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Libraries and museums developed rules for the description of their collections prior to formalizing the underlying conceptualization reflected in such rules. That formalizing process took place in the 1990s and resulted in two independent conceptual models: FRBR for bibliographic information (published in 1998), and CIDOC CRM for museum information (developed from 1996 on, and issued as ISO standard 21127 in 2006). An international working group was formed in 2003 with the purpose of harmonizing these two models. The resulting model, FRBROO, was published in 2009. It is an extension to CIDOC CRM, using the formalism in which the former is written. It adds to FRBR the dynamic aspects of CIDOC CRM, and a number of refinements (e.g. in the definitions of Work and Manifestation). Some modifications were made in CIDOC CRM as well. FRBROO was developed with Semantic Web technologies in mind, and lends itself well to the Linked Data environment; but will it be used in that context?
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
  7. Becker, H.-G.; Förster, F.: Vernetztes Wissen : Ereignisse in der bibliografischen Dokumentation (2010) 0.10 
    0.10232046 = product of:
  0.20464092 = sum of:
    0.20464092 = product of:
      0.40928185 = sum of:
        0.40928185 = weight(_text_:crm in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40928185 = score(doc=3494,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            1.055253 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Innerhalb der Gedächtnisinstitutionen Bibliothek, Museum und Archiv gibt es je eigene Beschreibungsmodelle der beherbergten Objekte und Materialien. Für eine genauere bibliografische Erschließung wurde im Bibliotheksbereich das von Benutzerbedürfnissen ausgehende, statische Modell "Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records" (FRBR) geschaffen, dessen ungenauer »Werk«-Begriff ebenso thematisiert wird wie die schwer zu realisierende Übertragbarkeit des Modells auf Nicht-Buchmaterialien. Die Museumswelt orientiert die Darstellung ihrer Bestände am CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM), das sich hinsichtlich der Beschreibung heterogener Museumsobjekte, also Artefakten künstlerischer und intellektueller Gestaltung, als hilfreich erwiesen hat. In gegenseitigem Austausch zwischen IFLA und ICOM wurde FRBR mit CRM harmonisiert. Das Ergebnis, FRBRoo (objektorientiertes FRBR), zeigt seine Vorzüge zum einen in einer strengeren Interpretation der Entitäten der Gruppe 1 des FRBR-Modells und zum anderen in einer genaueren Abbildung von Prozessen bzw. Ereignissen. Beispiele zum Anwendungsbezug von FRBRoo zeigen dessen Zugewinn für die wissenschaftliche Erschließung hand-, druck- und online-schriftlicher Quellen, Werken der Darstellenden Kunst, Landkarten und Musikalien innerhalb einer CRM-basierten Datenbank.
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
  8. Garcés, P.J.; Olivas, J.A.; Romero, F.P.: Concept-matching IR systems versus word-matching information retrieval systems : considering fuzzy interrelations for indexing Web pages (2006) 0.10 
    0.101772636 = product of:
  0.20354527 = sum of:
    0.20354527 = sum of:
      0.17053412 = weight(_text_:crm in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17053412 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.4396888 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
      0.033011146 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033011146 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents a semantic-based Web retrieval system that is capable of retrieving the Web pages that are conceptually related to the implicit concepts of the query. The concept of concept is managed from a fuzzy point of view by means of semantic areas. In this context, the proposed system improves most search engines that are based on matching words. The key of the system is to use a new version of the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy-Based Concept Representation Model (FIS-CRM) to extract and represent the concepts contained in both the Web pages and the user query. This model, which was integrated into other tools such as the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy based Searcher (FISS) metasearcher and the fz-mail system, considers the fuzzy synonymy and the fuzzy generality interrelations as a means of representing word interrelations (stored in a fuzzy synonymy dictionary and ontologies). The new version of the model, which is based on the study of the cooccurrences of synonyms, integrates a soft method for disambiguating word senses. This method also considers the context of the word to be disambiguated and the thematic ontologies and sets of synonyms stored in the dictionary.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:14:12
  9. Li, Z.; He, L.; Gao, D.: Ontology construction and evaluation for Chinese traditional culture : towards digital humanity (2022) 0.10 
    0.101772636 = product of:
  0.20354527 = sum of:
    0.20354527 = sum of:
      0.17053412 = weight(_text_:crm in 1097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17053412 = score(doc=1097,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.4396888 = fieldWeight in 1097, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1097)
      0.033011146 = weight(_text_:22 in 1097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033011146 = score(doc=1097,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1097, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1097)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Against the background that the top-level semantic framework of Chinese traditional culture is not comprehensive and unified, this study aims to preserve and disseminate cultural heritage information about Chinese traditional culture through the development of a domain ontology which is constructed from ancient books. A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was used to construct the ontology for Chinese traditional culture (CTCO). An investigation of historians' needs, and LDA topic clustering model were conducted, understanding the specific needs of historians, collecting the topic, concepts and relationships. CIDOC CRM was reused to construct the basic framework of CTCO. Ontology structure and function were adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of CTCO. Evaluation results show that the ontology meets all the quality criteria of OntoMetrics, and the experts agreed on content representation (average score = 4.30). CTCO contributes to the organization of traditional Chinese culture and the construction of related databases. The study also forms a common path and puts forward proposals for the construction of domain ontology, which has great social relevance.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 49(2022) no.1, S.22 - 39
  10. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.09720269 = sum of:
  0.077396005 = product of:
    0.232188 = sum of:
      0.232188 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.232188 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41313264 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.019806685 = product of:
    0.03961337 = sum of:
      0.03961337 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03961337 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  11. Kergosien, E.; Smida, K.B.; Cardon, R.; Grabar, N.; Wybo, M.: Creation of a domain ontology in CIDOC CRM OWL format using heterogeneous textual data related to industrial heritage (2018) 0.10 
    0.096468665 = product of:
  0.19293733 = sum of:
    0.19293733 = product of:
      0.38587466 = sum of:
        0.38587466 = weight(_text_:crm in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38587466 = score(doc=4865,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.9949022 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
  12. Carrasco, L.; Vidotti, S.: Handling multilinguality in heterogeneous digital cultural heritage systems trough CIDOC CRM ontology (2016) 0.10 
    0.096468665 = product of:
  0.19293733 = sum of:
    0.19293733 = product of:
      0.38587466 = sum of:
        0.38587466 = weight(_text_:crm in 4925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38587466 = score(doc=4925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.9949022 = fieldWeight in 4925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
  13. Park, H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Enhancing data curation of cultural heritage for information sharing : a case study using open Government data (2014) 0.09 
    0.08861213 = product of:
  0.17722426 = sum of:
    0.17722426 = product of:
      0.35444853 = sum of:
        0.35444853 = weight(_text_:crm in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35444853 = score(doc=1575,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.91387606 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to enhance cultural heritage data curation. A core research question of this study is how to share cultural heritage data by using ontologies. A case study was conducted using open government data mapped with the CIDOC-CRM (Conceptual Reference Model). Twelve library-related files in unstructured data format were collected from an open government website, Seoul Metropolitan Government of Korea (http://data.seoul.go.kr). By using the ontologies of the CIDOC CRM 5.1.2, we conducted a mapping process as a way of enhancing cultural heritage information to share information as a data component. We graphed each file then mapped each file in tables. Implications of this study are both the enhanced discoverability of unstructured data and the reusability of mapped information. Issues emerging from this study involve verification of detail for complete compatibility without further input from domain experts.
    Object
    CIDOC-CRM
  14. Vlachidis, A.; Tudhope, D.: ¬A knowledge-based approach to information extraction for semantic interoperability in the archaeology domain (2016) 0.09 
    0.08526706 = product of:
  0.17053412 = sum of:
    0.17053412 = product of:
      0.34106824 = sum of:
        0.34106824 = weight(_text_:crm in 2895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34106824 = score(doc=2895,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.8793776 = fieldWeight in 2895, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2895)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The article presents a method for automatic semantic indexing of archaeological grey-literature reports using empirical (rule-based) Information Extraction techniques in combination with domain-specific knowledge organization systems. The semantic annotation system (OPTIMA) performs the tasks of Named Entity Recognition, Relation Extraction, Negation Detection, and Word-Sense Disambiguation using hand-crafted rules and terminological resources for associating contextual abstractions with classes of the standard ontology CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM) for cultural heritage and its archaeological extension, CRM-EH. Relation Extraction (RE) performance benefits from a syntactic-based definition of RE patterns derived from domain oriented corpus analysis. The evaluation also shows clear benefit in the use of assistive natural language processing (NLP) modules relating to Word-Sense Disambiguation, Negation Detection, and Noun Phrase Validation, together with controlled thesaurus expansion. The semantic indexing results demonstrate the capacity of rule-based Information Extraction techniques to deliver interoperable semantic abstractions (semantic annotations) with respect to the CIDOC CRM and archaeological thesauri. Major contributions include recognition of relevant entities using shallow parsing NLP techniques driven by a complimentary use of ontological and terminological domain resources and empirical derivation of context-driven RE rules for the recognition of semantic relationships from phrases of unstructured text.
    Object
    CIDOC-CRM
  15. Becker, H.-G.: MODS2FRBRoo : Ein Tool zur Anbindung von bibliografischen Daten an eine Ontologie für Begriffe und Informationen (2010) 0.08 
    0.084410086 = product of:
  0.16882017 = sum of:
    0.16882017 = product of:
      0.33764035 = sum of:
        0.33764035 = weight(_text_:crm in 4265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33764035 = score(doc=4265,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.8705394 = fieldWeight in 4265, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4265)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Es wird ein Verfahren vorgestellt, mit dem bereits existierende bibliografische Daten in die CIDOC CRM/FRBRoo-Umgebung übertragen werden können. Es handelt sich dabei um einen mehrstufigen XSLT-Prozess, der im MODS-Format vorliegende bibliografische Daten in ein FRBRoo-konformes RDF umwandelt. Dazu werden die unterschiedlichen Publikationstypen in FRBRoo identifiziert und modelliert. Für die Abbildung der einzelnen bibliografischen Kategorien aus dem verwendeten Austauschformat auf die FRBRoo-Klassen wird auf Konzepte von RDA zurückgegriffen.
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
  16. Vlachidis, A.; Binding, C.; Tudhope, D.; May, K.: Excavating grey literature : a case study on the rich indexing of archaeological documents via natural language-processing techniques and knowledge-based resources (2010) 0.07 
    0.06821365 = product of:
  0.1364273 = sum of:
    0.1364273 = product of:
      0.2728546 = sum of:
        0.2728546 = weight(_text_:crm in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2728546 = score(doc=3948,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.70350206 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper sets out to discuss the use of information extraction (IE), a natural language-processing (NLP) technique to assist "rich" semantic indexing of diverse archaeological text resources. The focus of the research is to direct a semantic-aware "rich" indexing of diverse natural language resources with properties capable of satisfying information retrieval from online publications and datasets associated with the Semantic Technologies for Archaeological Resources (STAR) project. Design/methodology/approach - The paper proposes use of the English Heritage extension (CRM-EH) of the standard core ontology in cultural heritage, CIDOC CRM, and exploitation of domain thesauri resources for driving and enhancing an Ontology-Oriented Information Extraction process. The process of semantic indexing is based on a rule-based Information Extraction technique, which is facilitated by the General Architecture of Text Engineering (GATE) toolkit and expressed by Java Annotation Pattern Engine (JAPE) rules. Findings - Initial results suggest that the combination of information extraction with knowledge resources and standard conceptual models is capable of supporting semantic-aware term indexing. Additional efforts are required for further exploitation of the technique and adoption of formal evaluation methods for assessing the performance of the method in measurable terms. Originality/value - The value of the paper lies in the semantic indexing of 535 unpublished online documents often referred to as "Grey Literature", from the Archaeological Data Service OASIS corpus (Online AccesS to the Index of archaeological investigationS), with respect to the CRM ontological concepts E49.Time Appellation and P19.Physical Object.
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
  17. Hoffmann, M.: ¬Die beste Information ... : ...ist nur so gut, wie der Mechanismus, der sie zu den Entscheidungsträgern transportiert (2004) 0.06 
    0.05968694 = product of:
  0.11937388 = sum of:
    0.11937388 = product of:
      0.23874776 = sum of:
        0.23874776 = weight(_text_:crm in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23874776 = score(doc=2799,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.6155643 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In den Unternehmen hat man seit langem erkannt dass Wissen und Informationen wettbewerbskritische Ressourcen sind. Deshalb wurden vielfach Aktivitäten gestartet, um diese Ressourcen in Geschäftsprozesse zu integrieren. Der Beitrag diskutiert Chancen und Herausforderungen im Rahmen von Integrationsprojekten und stellt aktuelle Trends und Entwicklungen vor. Enterprise Information Integration wird als ein Konzept vorgestellt das auf den im Unternehmen vorhanden Ressourcen aufbaut und darauf abzielt diese besser zu vernetzen und zu optimieren. Außerdem werden zwei erfolgreiche Integrationsprojekte vorgestellt: zum einen das Informationsmanagement im Tabak- und Nahrungsmittelkonzern Altria und zum anderen das CRM-Projekt bei Reuters, der größten internationalen Multimedia-Nachrichtenagentur.
  18. Doerr, M.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR entities : identity and identification (2012) 0.06 
    0.059074756 = product of:
  0.11814951 = sum of:
    0.11814951 = product of:
      0.23629902 = sum of:
        0.23629902 = weight(_text_:crm in 1917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23629902 = score(doc=1917,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.6092507 = fieldWeight in 1917, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1917)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The models in the FRBR family include ways to document names or terms for all entities defined in the models, with identification as the ultimate aim, i.e., to distinguish entities by unique appellations and to use the most reliable appellations for entities in a given context. The intention in this paper is to explore the interrelationships between these different models with regards to their treatment of names, identifiers and other appellation entities. The specialisation/generalisation structure of the appellation-related entities and the relationships and properties of these entities will be discussed. The paper also tries to clarify the potential confusion of identity itself in this context - when are we talking about an entity via its name, about the name itself, about the name citation in a document and when about a name of name? In FRBR(er), titles for group 1, names for group 2 and terms for group 3 entities are merely defined as attributes of these entities. This serves the basic requirement of associating the appellation (label) with the entity, but does not allow introducing attributes of these appellations or relationships between and among them. FRAD, completed a decade later, defined as entities name, identifier, and controlled access point. Clearly making the distinction between a bibliographic entity and its name is a significant step taken in FRAD. This permits the separate treatment of relationships between the persons, families, and corporate bodies themselves and those relationships which instead operate between their names or between the controlled access points based on those names. In FRSAD, the most recent model, two entities are defined, Thema and Nomen. Again, the bibliographic entity is distinguished from the full range of its appellations. The FRBRoo model expanded on the treatment of appellations and identifiers in CRM by modeling the identifier assignment process. In FRBRoo, F12 Name was defined but identified with the existing CRM entity E41 Appellation. Current development is concentrating on integrating FRAD and FRSAD concepts into FRBRoo, and this is putting a focus on naming and appellations, causing new classes and properties to be defined, and requiring a re-evaluation of some of the decisions previously made in FRBRoo. As naming and appellations are such a significant feature of the FRBR family of conceptual models, this work is an important step in towards the consolidation of the models into a single coherent statement of the bibliographic universe.
    Object
    CIDOC CRM
  19. Gömpel, R.; Altenhöner, R.; Kunz, M.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Buenos Aires : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2004) 0.05 
    0.05483656 = product of:
  0.10967312 = sum of:
    0.10967312 = sum of:
      0.096468665 = weight(_text_:crm in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.096468665 = score(doc=2874,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.38785186 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.24872555 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.9592175 = idf(docFreq=41, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
      0.013204457 = weight(_text_:22 in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.013204457 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1706438 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0487299 = queryNorm
          0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    "Libraries: Tools for Education and Development" war das Motto der 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, dem Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, der vom 22.-27. August 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentinien, und damit erstmals in Lateinamerika stattfand. Rund 3.000 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer, davon ein Drittel aus spanischsprachigen Ländern, allein 600 aus Argentinien, besuchten die von der IFLA und dem nationalen Organisationskomitee gut organisierte Tagung mit mehr als 200 Sitzungen und Veranstaltungen. Aus Deutschland waren laut Teilnehmerverzeichnis leider nur 45 Kolleginnen und Kollegen angereist, womit ihre Zahl wieder auf das Niveau von Boston gesunken ist. Erfreulicherweise gab es nunmehr bereits im dritten Jahr eine deutschsprachige Ausgabe des IFLA-Express. Auch in diesem Jahr soll hier über die Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control berichtet werden. Die Arbeit der Division mit ihren Sektionen Bibliography, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing sowie der neuen Sektion Knowledge Management bildet einen der Schwerpunkte der IFLA-Arbeit, die dabei erzielten konkreten Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen haben maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die tägliche Arbeit der Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. Erstmals wird auch ausführlich über die Arbeit der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC und der Information Technology Section berichtet.
    Content
    Aus den Arbeitsgruppen der Cataloguing Sektion: Schwerpunkt der Arbeiten der ISBD Review Group bleibt die Fortsetzung des generellen Revisionsprojekts. 2004 konnte die revidierte ISBD(G) veröffentlicht werden Für die Revision der ISBD(A) wurde eine Study Group aus Experten für das Alte Buch gebildet. Das weltweite Stellungnahmeverfahren ist für Frühjahr 2005 geplant. Bezüglich der Revision der ISBD(ER) konnten im weltweiten Stellungnahmeverfahren aufgekommene Fragen während der Sitzungen in Buenos Aires abschließend geklärt werden. Die Veröffentlichung der neuen ISBD(ER) ist für Ende 2004 / Anfang 2005 geplant. Die Revision der ISBD(CM) ist im Rahmen einer gemeinsamen Arbeitsgruppe der ISBD Review Group und der Sektion Geographie und Karten weiter vorangekommen. Für die Revision der ISBD(NBM) soll eine eigene Study Group gebildet werden. Die FRBR Review Group konnte erste Fortschritte bei der Erreichung der im vergangenen Jahr gesetzten Ziele Erarbeitung einer Richtlinie zur Anwendung der FRBR bei der Katalogisierung, Erweiterung der FRBR-Web-Seite im IFLAnet, um bei anderen communities (Archive, Museen etc.) für das Modell zu werben, sowie Überarbeitung des FRBR-Modells vermeIden. Von den in Berlin gebildeten fünf FRBR-Arbeitsgruppen (Expression entity Working Group, Working Group an continuing resources, Working Group an teaching and training, Working Group an subject relationships and classification, Working Group an FRBR/CRM dialogue) sind einige bereits aktiv gewesen, vor allem die letztgenannte Working Group an FRBR/CRM dialogue. Die "Working Group an subject relationships and classification" soll demnächst in Zusammenarbeit mit der Classification and Indexing Section etabliert werden. Ziel hierbei ist es, die FRBR auch auf den Bereich der Inhaltserschließung auszuweiten. Die "Working Group an continuing resources" hat in Buenos Aires beschlossen, ihre Arbeit nicht fortzuführen, da die FRBR in ihrer derzeitigen Fassung "seriality" nicht ausreichend berücksichtigen. Es ist geplant, eine neue Arbeitsgruppe unter Einbeziehung ausgewiesener Experten für fortlaufende Werke zu bilden, die sich mit diesem Problem beschäftigen soll. Für das IFLA Multilingual Dictionary of Cataloguing Terms and Concepts - MulDiCat' konnten die Richtlinien für die Eingabe in die Datenbank fertig gestellt und erforderliche Änderungen in der Datenbank implementiert werden. Die Datenbank dieses IFLA-Projekts enthält mittlerweile alle englischsprachigen Definitionen des AACR2-Glossars, die deutschen Übersetzungen der AACR2-Glossar-Definitionen sowie alle ISBD-Definitionen. Im nächsten Schritt sollen Einträge für die FRBR-Terminologie ergänzt werden. Ebenso sollen Ergänzungen zu den englischen Einträgen vorgenommen werden (aus AACR, ISBD, FRBR und weiteren IFLA-Publikationen). Die Guidelines for OPAC Displays (Richtlinien zur Präsentation von Suchergebnissen im OPAC) stehen nach der Durchführung des weltweiten Stellungnahmeverfahrens zur Veröffentlichung im IFLAnet bereit. Die Working Group an OPAC Displays hat damit ihre Arbeit beendet.
  20. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.05 
    0.051597334 = product of:
  0.10319467 = sum of:
    0.10319467 = product of:
      0.309584 = sum of:
        0.309584 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.309584 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41313264 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0487299 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • el 73
  • b 34
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes