Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Belkin, N.J."
  1. Yuan, X. (J.); Belkin, N.J.: Applying an information-seeking dialogue model in an interactive information retrieval system (2014) 0.05
    0.049372107 = product of:
      0.09874421 = sum of:
        0.09874421 = sum of:
          0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 4544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06400974 = score(doc=4544,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05127382 = queryNorm
              0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 4544, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4544)
          0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 4544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034734476 = score(doc=4544,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05127382 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4544, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4544)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - People often engage in different information-seeking strategies (ISSs) within a single information-seeking episode. A critical concern for the design of information retrieval (IR) systems is how to provide support for these different behaviors in a manner which searchers can easily understand, navigate and use, as they move from one ISS to another. The purpose of this paper is to describe a dialogue structure that was implemented in an experimental IR system, in order to address this concern. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conducted a user-centered experiment to evaluate the IR systems. Participants were asked to search for information on two different task types, with four different topics per task, in both the experimental system and a baseline system emulating state-of-the-art IR systems. The authors report here the results related explicitly to the use of the experimental system's dialogue structure. Findings - For one of the task types, most participants followed the search steps as predicted in the dialogue structures, and those who did so completed the task in fewer moves. For the other task type, predicted order of moves was often not followed, but participants again used fewer moves when following the predicted order. Results demonstrate that the dialogue structures the authors designed indeed support effective human information behavior patterns in a variety of ways, and that searchers can effectively use a system which changes to support different ISSs. Originality/value - This study shows that it is both possible and beneficial, to design an IR system which can support multiple ISSs, and that such a system can be understood and used successfully.
    Date
    6. 4.2015 19:22:59
  2. Belkin, N.J.; Vickery, A.: Interaction in information systems : a review of research from document retrieval to knowledge-based systems (1985) 0.04
    0.044806816 = product of:
      0.08961363 = sum of:
        0.08961363 = product of:
          0.17922726 = sum of:
            0.17922726 = weight(_text_:report in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17922726 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05127382 = queryNorm
                0.73531044 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Library and information science report; 35
  3. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.03
    0.02778758 = product of:
      0.05557516 = sum of:
        0.05557516 = product of:
          0.11115032 = sum of:
            0.11115032 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11115032 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05127382 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  4. Yuan, X.; Belkin, N.J.: Investigating information retrieval support techniques for different information-seeking strategies (2010) 0.02
    0.016002435 = product of:
      0.03200487 = sum of:
        0.03200487 = product of:
          0.06400974 = sum of:
            0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06400974 = score(doc=3699,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05127382 = queryNorm
                0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We report on a study that investigated the efficacy of four different interactive information retrieval (IIR) systems, each designed to support a specific information-seeking strategy (ISS). These systems were constructed using different combinations of IR techniques (i.e., combinations of different methods of representation, comparison, presentation and navigation), each of which was hypothesized to be well suited to support a specific ISS. We compared the performance of searchers in each such system, designated experimental, to an appropriate baseline system, which implemented the standard specified query and results list model of current state-of-the-art experimental and operational IR systems. Four within-subjects experiments were conducted for the purpose of this comparison. Results showed that each of the experimental systems was superior to its baseline system in supporting user performance for the specific ISS (that is, the information problem leading to that ISS) for which the system was designed. These results indicate that an IIR system, which intends to support more than one kind of ISS, should be designed within a framework which allows the use and combination of different IR support techniques for different ISSs.
  5. Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Belkin, N.J.: Predicting information searchers' topic knowledge at different search stages (2016) 0.02
    0.016002435 = product of:
      0.03200487 = sum of:
        0.03200487 = product of:
          0.06400974 = sum of:
            0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 3147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06400974 = score(doc=3147,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05127382 = queryNorm
                0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 3147, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3147)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As a significant contextual factor in information search, topic knowledge has been gaining increased research attention. We report on a study of the relationship between information searchers' topic knowledge and their search behaviors, and on an attempt to predict searchers' topic knowledge from their behaviors during the search. Data were collected in a controlled laboratory experiment with 32 undergraduate journalism student participants, each searching on 4 tasks of different types. In general, behavioral variables were not found to have significant differences between users with high and low levels of topic knowledge, except the mean first dwell time on search result pages. Several models were built to predict topic knowledge using behavioral variables calculated at 3 different stages of search episodes: the first-query-round, the middle point of the search, and the end point. It was found that a model using some search behaviors observed in the first query round led to satisfactory prediction results. The results suggest that early-session search behaviors can be used to predict users' topic knowledge levels, allowing personalization of search for users with different levels of topic knowledge, especially in order to assist users with low topic knowledge.
  6. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.008683619 = product of:
      0.017367238 = sum of:
        0.017367238 = product of:
          0.034734476 = sum of:
            0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034734476 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05127382 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05