Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Toms, E.G."
  1. Toms, E.G.: What motivates the browser? (1999) 0.04
    0.039497685 = product of:
      0.07899537 = sum of:
        0.07899537 = sum of:
          0.051207792 = weight(_text_:report in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051207792 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05127382 = queryNorm
              0.2100887 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
          0.02778758 = weight(_text_:22 in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02778758 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05127382 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Browsing is considered to be unstructured and human-driven, although not a cognitively intensive process. It is conducted using systems that facilitate considerable user-system interactivity. Cued by the content, people immerse themselves in a topic of interest and meander from topic to topic while concurrently recognising interesting and informative information en route. They seem to seek and gather information in a purposeless, illogical and indiscriminate manner. Typical examples of these ostensibly random acts are scanning a non-fiction book, examining the morning newspaper, perusing the contents of a business report and scavenging the World Wide Web. Often the result is the acquisition of new information, the rejection or confirmation of an idea, or the genesis of new, perhaps not-wholly-formed thoughts about a topic. Noteworthy about this approach is that people explore information without having consciously structured queries or explicit goals. This form of passive information interaction behaviour is defined as acquiring and gathering information while scanning an information space without a specific goal in mind (Waterworth & Chignell, 1991; Toms, 1997), and for the purposes of this study, is called browsing. Traditionally, browsing is thought of in two ways: as a physical process - the action taken when one scans a list, a document, or a set of linked information nodes (e.g., Fox & Palay, 1979; Thompson & Croft, 1989; Ellis, 1989), and as a conceptual process, information seeking when the goal is ill-defined (e.g., Cove & Walsh, 1987). Browsing is also combined with searching in an integrated information-seeking process for retrieving information (e.g., Ellis, 1989; Belkin, Marchetti & Cool, 1993; Marchionini, 1995; Chang, 1995). Each of these cases focuses primarily on seeking information when the objective ranges from fuzzy to explicit.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:44:47
  2. Bartlett, J.C.; Toms, E.G.: Developing a protocol for bioinformatics analysis : an integrated information behavior and task analysis approach (2005) 0.01
    0.008683619 = product of:
      0.017367238 = sum of:
        0.017367238 = product of:
          0.034734476 = sum of:
            0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 5256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034734476 = score(doc=5256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05127382 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:28:55
  3. O'Brien, H.L.; Toms, E.G.: What is user engagement? : a conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology (2008) 0.01
    0.008683619 = product of:
      0.017367238 = sum of:
        0.017367238 = product of:
          0.034734476 = sum of:
            0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 1721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034734476 = score(doc=1721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05127382 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1721)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 3.2008 13:39:22
  4. Dufour, C.; Bartlett, J.C.; Toms, E.G.: Understanding how webcasts are used as sources of information (2011) 0.01
    0.008683619 = product of:
      0.017367238 = sum of:
        0.017367238 = product of:
          0.034734476 = sum of:
            0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034734476 = score(doc=4195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05127382 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:16:14
  5. Wildemuth, B.; Freund, L.; Toms, E.G.: Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies (2014) 0.01
    0.008683619 = product of:
      0.017367238 = sum of:
        0.017367238 = product of:
          0.034734476 = sum of:
            0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034734476 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05127382 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2015 19:31:22