-
Zhang, Y.: Scholarly use of Internet-based electronic resources (2001)
0.02
0.019202922 = product of:
0.038405843 = sum of:
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = weight(_text_:report in 5212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076811686 = score(doc=5212,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.31513304 = fieldWeight in 5212, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5212)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- By Internet resources Zhang means any electronic file accessible by any Internet protocol. Their usage is determined by an examination of the citations to such sources in a nine-year sample of four print and four electronic LIS journals, by a survey of editors of these journals, and by a survey of scholars with "in press" papers in these journals. Citations were gathered from Social Science Citation Index and manually classed as e-sources by the format used. All authors with "in press" papers were asked about their use and opinion of Internet sources and for any suggestions for improvement. Use of electronic sources is heavy and access is very high. Access and ability explain most usage while satisfaction was not significant. Citation of e-journals increases over the eight years. Authors report under citation of e-journals in favor of print equivalents. Traditional reasons are given for citing and not citing, but additional reasons are also present for e-journals.
-
Zhang, Y.; Ren, P.; Rijke, M. de: ¬A taxonomy, data set, and benchmark for detecting and classifying malevolent dialogue responses (2021)
0.02
0.019202922 = product of:
0.038405843 = sum of:
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = weight(_text_:report in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076811686 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.31513304 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Conversational interfaces are increasingly popular as a way of connecting people to information. With the increased generative capacity of corpus-based conversational agents comes the need to classify and filter out malevolent responses that are inappropriate in terms of content and dialogue acts. Previous studies on the topic of detecting and classifying inappropriate content are mostly focused on a specific category of malevolence or on single sentences instead of an entire dialogue. We make three contributions to advance research on the malevolent dialogue response detection and classification (MDRDC) task. First, we define the task and present a hierarchical malevolent dialogue taxonomy. Second, we create a labeled multiturn dialogue data set and formulate the MDRDC task as a hierarchical classification task. Last, we apply state-of-the-art text classification methods to the MDRDC task, and report on experiments aimed at assessing the performance of these approaches.
-
Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.: ¬A user-centered functional metadata evaluation of moving image collections (2008)
0.02
0.016002435 = product of:
0.03200487 = sum of:
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 1884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06400974 = score(doc=1884,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 1884, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1884)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, the authors report a series of evaluations of two metadata schemes developed for Moving Image Collections (MIC), an integrated online catalog of moving images. Through two online surveys and one experiment spanning various stages of metadata implementation, the MIC evaluation team explored a user-centered approach in which the four generic user tasks suggested by IFLA FRBR (International Association of Library Associations Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records) were embedded in data collection and analyses. Diverse groups of users rated usefulness of individual metadata fields for finding, identifying, selecting, and obtaining moving images. The results demonstrate a consistency across these evaluations with respect to (a) identification of a set of useful metadata fields highly rated by target users for each of the FRBR generic tasks, and (b) indication of a significant interaction between MIC metadata fields and the FRBR generic tasks. The findings provide timely feedback for the MIC implementation specifically, and valuable suggestions to other similar metadata application settings in general. They also suggest the feasibility of using the four IFLA FRBR generic tasks as a framework for user-centered functional metadata evaluations.
-
Zhang, Y.: Beyond quality and accessibility : source selection in consumer health information searching (2014)
0.02
0.016002435 = product of:
0.03200487 = sum of:
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 1252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06400974 = score(doc=1252,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 1252, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1252)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A systematic understanding of factors and criteria that affect consumers' selection of sources for health information is necessary for the design of effective health information services and information systems. However, current studies have overly focused on source attributes as indicators for 2 criteria, source quality and accessibility, and overlooked the role of other factors and criteria that help determine source selection. To fill this gap, guided by decision-making theories and the cognitive perspective to information search, we interviewed 30 participants about their reasons for using a wide range of sources for health information. Additionally, we asked each of them to report a critical incident in which sources were selected to fulfill a specific information need. Based on the analysis of the transcripts, 5 categories of factors were identified as influential to source selection: source-related factors, user-related factors, user-source relationships, characteristics of the problematic situation, and social influences. In addition, about a dozen criteria that mediate the influence of the factors on source-selection decisions were identified, including accessibility, quality, usability, interactivity, relevance, usefulness, familiarity, affection, anonymity, and appropriateness. These results significantly expanded the current understanding of the nature of costs and benefits involved in source-selection decisions, and strongly indicated that a personalized approach is needed for information services and information systems to provide effective access to health information sources for consumers.
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998)
0.01
0.012280491 = product of:
0.024560982 = sum of:
0.024560982 = product of:
0.049121965 = sum of:
0.049121965 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049121965 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 17:22:22
-
Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
-
Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:49:11
-
Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Song, S.: ¬The design and evaluation of a nudge-based interface to facilitate consumers' evaluation of online health information credibility (2023)
0.01
0.008683619 = product of:
0.017367238 = sum of:
0.017367238 = product of:
0.034734476 = sum of:
0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034734476 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:18:34
-
Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023)
0.01
0.008683619 = product of:
0.017367238 = sum of:
0.017367238 = product of:
0.034734476 = sum of:
0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034734476 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:07:12
