-
Gray, B.: Cataloging the special collections of Allegheny college (2005)
0.07
0.06912094 = product of:
0.13824189 = sum of:
0.13824189 = sum of:
0.08961363 = weight(_text_:report in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08961363 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.36765522 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.048628263 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048628263 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scholars have long noted the significance of Allegheny College's special collections to American cultural and educational history. Special collections have value to colleges and universities as publicity devices to draw scholars, students, and funding to the institution. Catalogers have an important role to play in marketing the library and the college through improved bibliographic access to these collections. Rare book and manuscript cataloging presents many challenges to catalogers, especially at smaller institutions. This report traces the evolution of Allegheny College's catalog, from book format in 1823, through card format, and finally to online. It also explores the bibliographic challenges created as the library moved from one format to another.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011)
0.07
0.06912094 = product of:
0.13824189 = sum of:
0.13824189 = sum of:
0.08961363 = weight(_text_:report in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08961363 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.36765522 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.048628263 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048628263 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Witt, M.: Section on cataloguing : report of activities 2000-2001 (2001)
0.05
0.051207792 = product of:
0.102415584 = sum of:
0.102415584 = product of:
0.20483117 = sum of:
0.20483117 = weight(_text_:report in 6913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483117 = score(doc=6913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.8403548 = fieldWeight in 6913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6913)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
O'Neill, E.T.: FRBR: Functional requirements for bibliographic records application of the entity-relationship model to Humphry Clinker (2002)
0.05
0.049372107 = product of:
0.09874421 = sum of:
0.09874421 = sum of:
0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06400974 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034734476 = score(doc=2434,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2434, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2434)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The report from the IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) recommended a new approach to cataloging based on an entity-relationship model. This study examined a single work, The Expedition of Humphry Clinker, to determine benefits and drawbacks associated with creating such an entity-relationship model. Humphry Clinker was selected for several reasons - it has been previously studied, it is widely held, and it is a work of mid-level complexity. In addition to analyzing the bibliographic records, many books were examined to ensure the accuracy of the resulting FRBR model. While it was possible to identify works and manifestations, identifying expressions was problematic. Reliable identification of expressions frequently necessitated the examination of the books themselves. Enhanced manifestation records where the roles of editors, illustrators, translators, and other contributors are explicitly identified may be a viable alternative to expressions. For Humphry Clinker, the enhanced record approach avoids the problem of identifying expressions while providing similar functionality. With the enhanced manifestation record, the three remaining entity-relationship structures - works, manifestations, and items - the FRBR model provides a powerful means to improve bibliographic organization and navigation.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999)
0.04
0.044806816 = product of:
0.08961363 = sum of:
0.08961363 = product of:
0.17922726 = sum of:
0.17922726 = weight(_text_:report in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17922726 = score(doc=1915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.73531044 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information management report. 1999, Dec., S.16-18
-
Murtomaa, E.: ¬The impact of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records recommendations on the ISBD(ER) (1999)
0.04
0.044347253 = product of:
0.088694505 = sum of:
0.088694505 = product of:
0.17738901 = sum of:
0.17738901 = weight(_text_:report in 5320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17738901 = score(doc=5320,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.72776866 = fieldWeight in 5320, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5320)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The main concepts of the report from the report Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) are described. The functionality of the elements included in ISBD(ER) within the FRBR framework is examined. Proposals are offered for the core-level description and for the basic-level national bibliographic record for electronic resources. Also presented are impacts of the FRBR report on creating single/multiple bibliographic records and the idea of the authoritative file of bibliographic descriptions.
-
RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000)
0.04
0.039297573 = product of:
0.07859515 = sum of:
0.07859515 = product of:
0.1571903 = sum of:
0.1571903 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1571903 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2000 19:22:27
-
Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997)
0.04
0.038803842 = product of:
0.077607684 = sum of:
0.077607684 = product of:
0.15521537 = sum of:
0.15521537 = weight(_text_:report in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15521537 = score(doc=91,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.63679755 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model
-
Report on the harmonization of German cataloging rules and AACR2 available (1998)
0.04
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = product of:
0.15362337 = sum of:
0.15362337 = weight(_text_:report in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15362337 = score(doc=3114,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.6302661 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Heynen, J.: ¬The ARL Microform Project for the bibliographic control of microforms : report on a survey of microform sets in U.S. and Canadian libraries (1984)
0.04
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = product of:
0.15362337 = sum of:
0.15362337 = weight(_text_:report in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15362337 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.6302661 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wood, W.: ¬The changing role of the catalog librarian : a report of a study at one institution (1990)
0.04
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = product of:
0.15362337 = sum of:
0.15362337 = weight(_text_:report in 503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15362337 = score(doc=503,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.6302661 = fieldWeight in 503, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=503)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bourdon, F.: International cooperation in the field of name authority data : observations and recommendations (1995)
0.04
0.03620938 = product of:
0.07241876 = sum of:
0.07241876 = product of:
0.14483751 = sum of:
0.14483751 = weight(_text_:report in 4674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14483751 = score(doc=4674,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.5942206 = fieldWeight in 4674, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4674)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Summarizes the main points of the final report of an IFLA study of international cooperation in the application of name authority data to bibliographic control, as part of the UBCIM Programme. The report is in French and ist entitled: 'La cooperation internationale en matière de données d'auteurs: constats; reflexions, recommendations'. An English translation is expected in the future
-
Glassel, A.D.; Wells, A.T.: Scout Report Signpost : design and development for access to catalogued Internet resource (1998)
0.04
0.03620938 = product of:
0.07241876 = sum of:
0.07241876 = product of:
0.14483751 = sum of:
0.14483751 = weight(_text_:report in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14483751 = score(doc=2207,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.5942206 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Scout Report Signpost demonstrates that Internet resources can be catalogued, classified and arranged using existing taxonomies such as the LCC and LCSH in concert with emerging metadata standards, such as the Dublin Core. Discusses the techniques used to accomplish this, as well as difficulties inherent in such an effort and details a theoretical framework for cataloguing
-
Naun, C.C.: For all of us? : a report on the 12th National Cataloguing Conference, Canberra 1997 (1997)
0.04
0.03620938 = product of:
0.07241876 = sum of:
0.07241876 = product of:
0.14483751 = sum of:
0.14483751 = weight(_text_:report in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14483751 = score(doc=2830,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.5942206 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Report of the 12th Australian National Cataloguing Conference, Canberra, Australia, 11 Sep 1997, in which issues discussed are summarized under the following headings: innovation and enervation; cataloguing skills for electronic documents; the AACR Conference; the nature of a work; content vs. carrier; issues related to seriality; networling; workshop reports; human resource management; career strategies for cataloguers; and cataloguing standards
-
Tillett, B.: Report on the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, held October 23-25, 1997 in Toronto, Canada (1998)
0.04
0.03620938 = product of:
0.07241876 = sum of:
0.07241876 = product of:
0.14483751 = sum of:
0.14483751 = weight(_text_:report in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14483751 = score(doc=3717,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.5942206 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Report of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, 23-25 Oct 1997, Toronto. This conference examined cataloguing principles and rules in light of both description and access within the framework of library catalogues. In particular it focused on bibliographic and authority records and the usability of the library catalogue
-
OCLC releases updated version of Dewey for Windows, Project REUSE final report (1998)
0.04
0.03620938 = product of:
0.07241876 = sum of:
0.07241876 = product of:
0.14483751 = sum of:
0.14483751 = weight(_text_:report in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14483751 = score(doc=150,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.5942206 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes 2 products released by OCLC. The 1.1 version of Dewey for Windows includes a function for assigning Cutter numbers, an online guide and several enhancements to the 1996 version. Project REUSE is a collaborative initiative of OCLC, the LoC and the SUB Göttingen in Germany to harmonize German cataloguing rules and AACR. the report is now available on the OCLC Web site and covers the participants, organization and methodology of the project and a review of its results
-
Byrd, J.; Charbonneau, G.; Charbonneau, M.; Courtney, A.; Johnson, E.; Leonard, K.; Morrison, A.; Mudge, S.; O'Bryan, A.; Opasik, S.; Riley, J.; Turchyn, S.: ¬A white paper on the future of cataloging at Indiana University (2006)
0.04
0.035782535 = product of:
0.07156507 = sum of:
0.07156507 = product of:
0.14313014 = sum of:
0.14313014 = weight(_text_:report in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14313014 = score(doc=3225,freq=10.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.5872158 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is a report by a group "charged to identify current trends that will have a direct impact on cataloging operations and to define possible new roles for the online catalog and cataloging staff at Indiana University." Their one general conclusion after nine months of work is that "The need for cataloging expertise within the I.U. Libraries will not be diminished in the coming years. Rather, catalogers of the future will work in the evolving environment of publishing, scholarly communication, and information technology in new expanded roles. Catalogers will need to be key players in addressing the many challenges facing the libraries and the overall management and organization of information at Indiana University." The report also identifies five strategic directions. The report is an interesting read, and taken with the explosion of related reports (e.g., Calhoun's report to the Library of Congress cited in this issue, the UC Bibliographic Services TF Report), adds yet another perspective to the kinds of changes we must foster to create better library services in a vastly changed environment.
-
Hoogcarspel, A.: Guidelines for cataloging monographic electronic texts at the Center for Electronic Texts in the Humanities (1994)
0.03
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = product of:
0.12801948 = sum of:
0.12801948 = weight(_text_:report in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12801948 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.52522177 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Technical report; no.1
-
Functional requirements for bibliographic records : Final report (1998)
0.03
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = product of:
0.12801948 = sum of:
0.12801948 = weight(_text_:report in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12801948 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.52522177 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tan, J.: 12th National Cataloguing Conference (1997)
0.03
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = product of:
0.12801948 = sum of:
0.12801948 = weight(_text_:report in 2836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12801948 = score(doc=2836,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.52522177 = fieldWeight in 2836, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2836)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Report of the 12th Australian National Cataloguing Conference, Canberra, Australia, 11 Sep 1997, focusing on: Workshop 3: Cataloguing standards - can we afford them? and Workshop 5: Cataloguing skills for electronic documents. Looks at areas of the University of Adelaide Library's draft procedural document for Internet sites to be catalogued
