-
Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003)
0.10
0.10020634 = product of:
0.20041268 = sum of:
0.20041268 = sum of:
0.14483751 = weight(_text_:report in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14483751 = score(doc=2871,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.5942206 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.05557516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05557516 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
- Date
- 30. 7.2004 12:22:52
- Source
- The Gilbane report. 11(2003) no. 2, March. S.2-13
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.07
0.06912094 = product of:
0.13824189 = sum of:
0.13824189 = sum of:
0.08961363 = weight(_text_:report in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08961363 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.36765522 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.048628263 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048628263 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
-
Markey, K.; Demeyer, A.N.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: evaluation of a library schedule and index integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog : final report to the Council of Library Resources (1986)
0.05
0.045261722 = product of:
0.090523444 = sum of:
0.090523444 = product of:
0.18104689 = sum of:
0.18104689 = weight(_text_:report in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18104689 = score(doc=3472,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.74277574 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Research report. Online Computer Library Center; OCLC/OPR/RR-86/1
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Bliedung, S.: Thesaurification of UDC: preliminary report (1990)
0.04
0.044806816 = product of:
0.08961363 = sum of:
0.08961363 = product of:
0.17922726 = sum of:
0.17922726 = weight(_text_:report in 258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17922726 = score(doc=258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.73531044 = fieldWeight in 258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=258)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996)
0.04
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = product of:
0.15362337 = sum of:
0.15362337 = weight(_text_:report in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15362337 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.6302661 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984)
0.03
0.02778758 = product of:
0.05557516 = sum of:
0.05557516 = product of:
0.11115032 = sum of:
0.11115032 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11115032 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
-
New roles for classification in libraries and information networks : presentations and reports from the 36th Allerton Institute, Oct. 23-25, 1994 (1995)
0.03
0.027717032 = product of:
0.055434063 = sum of:
0.055434063 = product of:
0.110868126 = sum of:
0.110868126 = weight(_text_:report in 6049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110868126 = score(doc=6049,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.4548554 = fieldWeight in 6049, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6049)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge; COCHRANE, P.A.: New roles for classification in libraries and information networks; CHAN, L.M.: Classification, present and future; MOLHOLP, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the information superhighway; DAHLBERG, I.: The future of classification in libraries and networks: a theoretical point of view; MITCHELL, J.: DDC21 and beyond: the Dewey Decimal Classification prepares for the future; McILWAINE, I.: Preparing traditional classifications for the future: Universal Decimal Classification; COATES, E.J.: BC2 and BSO: presentation at the 36th Allerton Institue, 1994 Session of preparing traditional classifications for the future; HILL, J.S.: Calssification: an administrative perspective; WYLY, B.: What lies ahead for classification in information networks? Report of a panel discussion; ZIADIE, A.M.: Classification in libraries and networks abroad: report of a panel discussion; LINCICUM, S.: Critical appraisal of the use of classification in the future - non-traditional uses of classification: report of a panel discussion; THOMAS, A.R.S.: New roles for classification in libraries and information networks: an excerpt bibliography; BROADBENT, E.: Classification access in the online catalog
-
¬The UDC : Essays for a new decade (1990)
0.02
0.022403408 = product of:
0.044806816 = sum of:
0.044806816 = product of:
0.08961363 = sum of:
0.08961363 = weight(_text_:report in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08961363 = score(doc=661,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.36765522 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: STRACHAN, P.D.: UDC revision work in FID; SCIBOR, E. u. I.S. SHCHERBINA-SAMOJLOVA: A strategic approach to to revising the UDC; MCILWAINE, I.: The work of the system development task force; WILLIAMSON, N.J.: The UDC: its future; HAARALA, A.-R.: FID pre-conference seminar on computer applications of the UDC; LOTH, K. u. H. FUNK: Subject search on ETHICS on the basis of the UDC; KURHULA, P.: Use and usability of the UDC in classification practice and online retrieval; RINNE, B.: HELECON system: economics databases; NAKAMURA, Y. u. T. ISHIKAWA: Expert systems for automatic UDC number assignment; RIESTHUIS, G.J.A. u. S. BLIEDUNG: Thesaurification of UDC: preliminary report
-
Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000)
0.02
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = product of:
0.083362736 = sum of:
0.083362736 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083362736 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:42:47
-
National Seminar on Classification in the Digital Environment : Papers contributed to the National Seminar an Classification in the Digital Environment, Bangalore, 9-11 August 2001 (2001)
0.02
0.019748842 = product of:
0.039497685 = sum of:
0.039497685 = sum of:
0.025603896 = weight(_text_:report in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025603896 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.10504435 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.01389379 = weight(_text_:22 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01389379 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 2. 1.2004 10:35:22
- Footnote
- AHUJA and SATIJA (Relevance of Ranganathan's Classification Theory in the Age of Digital Libraries) note that traditional bibliographic classification systems have been applied in the digital environment with only limited success. They find that the "inherent flexibility of electronic manipulation of documents or their surrogates should allow a more organic approach to allocation of new subjects and appropriate linkages between subject hierarchies." (p. 18). Ahija and Satija also suggest that it is necessary to shift from a "subject" focus to a "need" focus when applying classification theory in the digital environment. They find Ranganathan's framework applicable in the digital environment. Although Ranganathan's focus is "subject oriented and hence emphasise the hierarchical and linear relationships" (p. 26), his framework "can be successfully adopted with certain modifications ... in the digital environment." (p. 26). SHAH and KUMAR (Model for System Unification of Geographical Schedules (Space Isolates)) report an a plan to develop a single schedule for geographical Subdivision that could be used across all classification systems. The authors argue that this is needed in order to facilitate interoperability in the digital environment. SAN SEGUNDO MANUEL (The Representation of Knowledge as a Symbolization of Productive Electronic Information) distills different approaches and definitions of the term "representation" as it relates to representation of knowledge in the library and information science literature and field. SHARADA (Linguistic and Document Classification: Paradigmatic Merger Possibilities) suggests the development of a universal indexing language. The foundation for the universal indexing language is Chomsky's Minimalist Program and Ranganathan's analytico-synthetic classification theory; Acording to the author, based an these approaches, it "should not be a problem" (p. 62) to develop a universal indexing language.
-
Louie, A.J.; Maddox, E.L.; Washington, W.: Using faceted classification to provide structure for information architecture (2003)
0.02
0.019202922 = product of:
0.038405843 = sum of:
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = weight(_text_:report in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076811686 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.31513304 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is a short, but very thorough and very interesting, report on how the writers built a faceted classification for some legal information and used it to structure a web site with navigation and searching. There is a good summary of why facets work well and how they fit into bibliographic control in general. The last section is about their implementation of a web site for the Washington State Bar Association's Council for Legal Public Education. Their classification uses three facets: Purpose (the general aim of the document, e.g. Resources for K-12 Teachers), Topic (the subject of the document), and Type (the legal format of the document). See Example Web Sites, below, for a discussion of the site and a problem with its design.
-
Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990)
0.02
0.017367238 = product of:
0.034734476 = sum of:
0.034734476 = product of:
0.06946895 = sum of:
0.06946895 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06946895 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:22:40
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.02
0.017367238 = product of:
0.034734476 = sum of:
0.034734476 = product of:
0.06946895 = sum of:
0.06946895 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06946895 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
Wyly, B.: What lies ahead for classification in information networks? : report of a panel discussion (1995)
0.02
0.016002435 = product of:
0.03200487 = sum of:
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 5568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06400974 = score(doc=5568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 5568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5568)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Lincicum, S.: Critical appraisal of the use of classification in the future : non traditional uses of classification: report of a panel discussion (1995)
0.02
0.016002435 = product of:
0.03200487 = sum of:
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 5570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06400974 = score(doc=5570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 5570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5570)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
LaBarre, K.: ¬A multi faceted view : use of facet analysis in the practice of website organization and access (2006)
0.02
0.016002435 = product of:
0.03200487 = sum of:
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06400974 = score(doc=257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=257)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In 2001, information architects and knowledge management specialists charged with designing websites and access to corporate knowledge bases seemingly re-discovered a legacy form of information organization and access: faceted analytico-synthetic theory (FAST). Instrumental in creating new and different ways for people to engage with the digital content of the Web, the members of this group have clearly recognized that faceted approaches have the potential to improve access to information on the web. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of FAST, while others seem to mimic the forms implicitly (Adkisson, 2003). The focus of this ongoing research study is two-fold. First, access and organizational structures in a stratified random sample of 200 DMOZ websites were examined for evidence of the use of FAST. Second, in the context of unstructured interviews, the understanding and use of FAST among a group of eighteen practitioners is uncovered. This is a preliminary report of the website component capture and interview phases of this research study. Future work will involve formalizing a set of feature guidelines drawn from the initial phases of this research study. Preliminary observations will be drawn from the first phase of this study.
-
LaBarre, K.; Cochrane, P.A.: Facet analysis as a knowledge management tool on the Internet (2006)
0.02
0.016002435 = product of:
0.03200487 = sum of:
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 1489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06400974 = score(doc=1489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 1489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In 2001, a group of information architects involved in designing websites, and knowledge management specialists involved in creating access to corporate knowledge bases appeared to have re-discovered facet analysis and faceted classification. These groups have been instrumental in creating new and different ways of handling digital content of the Internet. Some of these practitioners explicitly use the forms and language of facet analysis and faceted classification, while others seem to do so implicitly. Following a brief overview of the work and discussions on facets and faceted classification in recent years, we focus on our observations about new information resources which seem more in line with the Fourth law of Library Science ("Save the time of the reader") than most library OPACs today. These new developments on the Internet point to a partial grasp of a disciplined approach to subject access. This is where Ranganathan and Neelameghan's approach needs to be reviewed for the new audience of information system designers. A report on the work undertaken by us forms a principal part of this paper.
-
Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010)
0.01
0.01473659 = product of:
0.02947318 = sum of:
0.02947318 = product of:
0.05894636 = sum of:
0.05894636 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05894636 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
- Date
- 22. 1.2010 15:06:54
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.01
0.01389379 = product of:
0.02778758 = sum of:
0.02778758 = product of:
0.05557516 = sum of:
0.05557516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05557516 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003)
0.01
0.01389379 = product of:
0.02778758 = sum of:
0.02778758 = product of:
0.05557516 = sum of:
0.05557516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05557516 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
