-
Hunt, R. et.al: PRECIS, LCSH and KWOC : report of a research project designed to examine the applicability of PRECIS to the subject of an academic library (1977)
0.04
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = product of:
0.15362337 = sum of:
0.15362337 = weight(_text_:report in 5274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15362337 = score(doc=5274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.6302661 = fieldWeight in 5274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5274)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kanjilal, A.: Permuted keyword index using CDS/ISIS : a tutorial (1992)
0.02
0.022403408 = product of:
0.044806816 = sum of:
0.044806816 = product of:
0.08961363 = sum of:
0.08961363 = weight(_text_:report in 5810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08961363 = score(doc=5810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.36765522 = fieldWeight in 5810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes a utility program designed to generate a permuted keyword index from a CDS/ISIS database. The different keywords which are used to describe the subject content of documents are presented together in a string, thus showing the context in which the lead term is used. Indexes can also be generated for any repeatable field, such as author and report number. The string is rotated from left to right to provide an access from each of the terms used. Pascal is the language used and a step by step tutorial is given to create the necessary databases
-
Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995)
0.02
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = product of:
0.083362736 = sum of:
0.083362736 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083362736 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25.11.2005 18:37:22
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995)
0.02
0.019202922 = product of:
0.038405843 = sum of:
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = weight(_text_:report in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076811686 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.31513304 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- BLRD report; 6211
-
Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : II. A preliminary evaluation and failure analysis (1998)
0.02
0.019202922 = product of:
0.038405843 = sum of:
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = weight(_text_:report in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076811686 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.31513304 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Partial coordination is a new method for cataloging documents for subject access. It is especially designed to enhance the precision of document searches in online environments. This article reports a preliminary evaluation of partial coordination that shows promising results compared with full-text retrieval. We also report the difficulties in empirically evaluating the effectiveness of automatic full-text retrieval in contrast to mixed methods such as partial coordination which combine human cataloging with computerized retrieval. Based on our study, we propose research in this area will substantially benefit from a common framework for failure analysis and a common data set. This will allow information retrieval researchers adapting 'library style'cataloging to large electronic document collections, as well as those developing automated or mixed methods, to directly compare their proposals for indexing and retrieval. This article concludes by suggesting guidelines for constructing such as testbed
-
Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000)
0.02
0.019202922 = product of:
0.038405843 = sum of:
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = weight(_text_:report in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076811686 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.31513304 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
-
Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000)
0.02
0.019202922 = product of:
0.038405843 = sum of:
0.038405843 = product of:
0.076811686 = sum of:
0.076811686 = weight(_text_:report in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076811686 = score(doc=5921,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.31513304 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
-
Wiesenmüller, H.: LCSH goes RSWK? : Überlegungen zur Diskussion um die "Library of Congress subject headings" (2009)
0.02
0.016002435 = product of:
0.03200487 = sum of:
0.03200487 = product of:
0.06400974 = sum of:
0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06400974 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im Jahr 1898 begann die Library of Congress mit der Arbeit an einem Schlagwortkatalog - die Geburtsstunde der 'Library of Congress subject headings' (LCSH). Heute stellen die LCSH das zentrale Werkzeug zur verbalen inhaltlichen Erschließung in der gesamten angloamerikanischen Welt dar. Auch die Kritik an diesem Erschließungssystem hat eine lange Geschichte: Sie lässt sich bis in die Mitte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts zurückverfolgen und betraf im Lauf der Zeit recht unterschiedliche Aspekte. Neu an der Debatte der letzten Jahre ist, dass die Struktur der LCSH ganz grundsätzlich in Frage gestellt wird. Eine Projektgruppe der Bibliothek der University of California etwa urteilte 2005: "LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control." In einer für die Library of Congress erstellten Expertise mit dem Titel 'On the record' von 2008 heißt es: "LCSH suffers (...) from a structure that is cumbersome from both administrative and automation points of view". Es wird empfohlen, die LCSH in ein flexibleres Werkzeug zu verwandeln: "Transform LCSH into a tool that provides a more flexible means to create and modify subject authority data." Dies beinhaltet zum einen ein "de-coupling of subject strings", also eine 'Entkoppelung' der fest zusammengefügten (präkombinierten) Eintragungen, und zum anderen die Möglichkeit, das LCSH-Vokabular für "faceted browsing and discovery" nutzbar zu machen . Besonders drastische Worte wurden 2006 im sogenannten 'Calhoun Report' gefunden - einem Papier, das mit seinen radikalen Thesen in der amerikanischen Bibliothekswelt viel Aufsehen erregte: Man müsse die Library of Congress dazu bringen, die LCSH zu 'zerschlagen' ("urge LC to dismantle LCSH") - ja, sie gar zu 'eliminieren' ("eliminate LCSH").
-
Gnoli, C.: Knowledge organization in Italy (2004)
0.02
0.015841601 = product of:
0.031683203 = sum of:
0.031683203 = product of:
0.063366406 = sum of:
0.063366406 = weight(_text_:report in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063366406 = score(doc=3750,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.2599715 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As an Italian chapter of ISKO has recently been reorganized, I was kindly invited to Write a short report an current KO activities in our country. So, in the following, I will briefly illustrate the local situation of the various kinds of knowledge organization systems, as well as related developments and activities. I am grateful to Paola Capitani, Emanuela Casson, Michele Santoro, and Lorena Zuccolo for providing useful information to be included here.
- Content
- "Subject headings Many Italian libraries create subject headings for their catalogues, using as a reference guide the "Soggettario per i catalogui delle biblioteche italiane." This is basically a list of subject terms created by the Biblioteca nazionale centrale di Firenze (BNCF), first published in 1956 and later updated with various lists of new subject headings. Though the Soggettario is still the main available reference, librarians are generally aware that it is outdated in both vocabulary and structure, especially as it does not provide explicit principles and rules to create and combine subject headings. A research group, called the Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto (GRIS), was founded in 1990. It was devoted to improving the principles and consistency of subject indexing. Its members have performed in depth investigations of the structure of subject headings, starting with the principles of facet analysis used in PRECIS and including original developments. Results of their work are coded into the Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto, published in 1996 and available also online <http:// wwwaib.it/aib/commiss/gris/gulda.htm>. The GRIS guide does not concern vocabulary, but morphological and syntactical rules for choosing and combining terms according to a sound citation order, based an a "role scheme." Unfortunately, GRIS principles have been applied only in a small number of libraries, mainly in Tuscany, rohere most GRIS members are located. A new project is now attempting to blend the traditional authority of the Soggettario with the more advanced principles of GRIS. A working group has been formed with people from BNCF, GRIS, and others, to study the feasibility of a renewal of the Soggettario. The group produced a report book in 2002, specifying the desirable features of the new system, and is at present searching for grants to implement it.
-
(Sears') List of Subject Headings (1994)
0.01
0.012157066 = product of:
0.024314132 = sum of:
0.024314132 = product of:
0.048628263 = sum of:
0.048628263 = weight(_text_:22 in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048628263 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
-
Studwell, W.E.: Why not an 'AACR' for subject headings? (1985)
0.01
0.012157066 = product of:
0.024314132 = sum of:
0.024314132 = product of:
0.048628263 = sum of:
0.048628263 = weight(_text_:22 in 363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048628263 = score(doc=363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:01
-
Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009)
0.01
0.012157066 = product of:
0.024314132 = sum of:
0.024314132 = product of:
0.048628263 = sum of:
0.048628263 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048628263 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
-
(Sears') List of Subject Headings (1997)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vorgänger: 'List of Subject Headings for small libraries, compiled from lists used in nine representative small libraries', Ed.: M.E. Sears. - 1st ed. 1923. - 2nd ed. 1926. - 3rd ed. 1933. - 4th ed. 1939, Ed.: I.S. Monro. - 5th ed. 1944: 'Sears List of Subject Headings', Ed. I. S. Monro. - 6th ed. 1950, Ed.: B.M. Frick. - 7th ed. 1954 - 8th ed. 1959. - 'List of Subject Headings'. - 9th. ed. 1965, Ed.: B.M. Westby. - 10th ed. 1972. - 11th ed. 1977. - 12th ed. 1982. - 13th ed. 1986, Ed.: C. Rovira u. C. Reyes. - 14th ed. 1991. Ed. M.T. Mooney. - 15th ed. 1994, Ed.: J. Miller // Rez. 15th ed.: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
-
MacEwan, A.: Crossing language barriers in Europe : Linking LCSH to other subject heading languages (2000)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:10
-
Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2001 16:22:21
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:13
-
Sears' list of subject headings (2018)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21.12.2018 18:22:12
-
Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023)
0.01
0.010420342 = product of:
0.020840684 = sum of:
0.020840684 = product of:
0.041681368 = sum of:
0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041681368 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05127382 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.11.2023 18:59:22
