Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  1. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.02 
    0.019202922 = product of:
  0.038405843 = sum of:
    0.038405843 = product of:
      0.076811686 = sum of:
        0.076811686 = weight(_text_:report in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076811686 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.31513304 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
  2. Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000) 0.02 
    0.019202922 = product of:
  0.038405843 = sum of:
    0.038405843 = product of:
      0.076811686 = sum of:
        0.076811686 = weight(_text_:report in 5921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076811686 = score(doc=5921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.31513304 = fieldWeight in 5921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5921)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
  3. Wiesenmüller, H.: LCSH goes RSWK? : Überlegungen zur Diskussion um die "Library of Congress subject headings" (2009) 0.02 
    0.016002435 = product of:
  0.03200487 = sum of:
    0.03200487 = product of:
      0.06400974 = sum of:
        0.06400974 = weight(_text_:report in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06400974 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.26261088 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 1898 begann die Library of Congress mit der Arbeit an einem Schlagwortkatalog - die Geburtsstunde der 'Library of Congress subject headings' (LCSH). Heute stellen die LCSH das zentrale Werkzeug zur verbalen inhaltlichen Erschließung in der gesamten angloamerikanischen Welt dar. Auch die Kritik an diesem Erschließungssystem hat eine lange Geschichte: Sie lässt sich bis in die Mitte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts zurückverfolgen und betraf im Lauf der Zeit recht unterschiedliche Aspekte. Neu an der Debatte der letzten Jahre ist, dass die Struktur der LCSH ganz grundsätzlich in Frage gestellt wird. Eine Projektgruppe der Bibliothek der University of California etwa urteilte 2005: "LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control." In einer für die Library of Congress erstellten Expertise mit dem Titel 'On the record' von 2008 heißt es: "LCSH suffers (...) from a structure that is cumbersome from both administrative and automation points of view". Es wird empfohlen, die LCSH in ein flexibleres Werkzeug zu verwandeln: "Transform LCSH into a tool that provides a more flexible means to create and modify subject authority data." Dies beinhaltet zum einen ein "de-coupling of subject strings", also eine 'Entkoppelung' der fest zusammengefügten (präkombinierten) Eintragungen, und zum anderen die Möglichkeit, das LCSH-Vokabular für "faceted browsing and discovery" nutzbar zu machen . Besonders drastische Worte wurden 2006 im sogenannten 'Calhoun Report' gefunden - einem Papier, das mit seinen radikalen Thesen in der amerikanischen Bibliothekswelt viel Aufsehen erregte: Man müsse die Library of Congress dazu bringen, die LCSH zu 'zerschlagen' ("urge LC to dismantle LCSH") - ja, sie gar zu 'eliminieren' ("eliminate LCSH").
  4. Gnoli, C.: Knowledge organization in Italy (2004) 0.02 
    0.015841601 = product of:
  0.031683203 = sum of:
    0.031683203 = product of:
      0.063366406 = sum of:
        0.063366406 = weight(_text_:report in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063366406 = score(doc=3750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.2599715 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    As an Italian chapter of ISKO has recently been reorganized, I was kindly invited to Write a short report an current KO activities in our country. So, in the following, I will briefly illustrate the local situation of the various kinds of knowledge organization systems, as well as related developments and activities. I am grateful to Paola Capitani, Emanuela Casson, Michele Santoro, and Lorena Zuccolo for providing useful information to be included here.
    Content
    "Subject headings Many Italian libraries create subject headings for their catalogues, using as a reference guide the "Soggettario per i catalogui delle biblioteche italiane." This is basically a list of subject terms created by the Biblioteca nazionale centrale di Firenze (BNCF), first published in 1956 and later updated with various lists of new subject headings. Though the Soggettario is still the main available reference, librarians are generally aware that it is outdated in both vocabulary and structure, especially as it does not provide explicit principles and rules to create and combine subject headings. A research group, called the Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto (GRIS), was founded in 1990. It was devoted to improving the principles and consistency of subject indexing. Its members have performed in depth investigations of the structure of subject headings, starting with the principles of facet analysis used in PRECIS and including original developments. Results of their work are coded into the Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto, published in 1996 and available also online <http:// wwwaib.it/aib/commiss/gris/gulda.htm>. The GRIS guide does not concern vocabulary, but morphological and syntactical rules for choosing and combining terms according to a sound citation order, based an a "role scheme." Unfortunately, GRIS principles have been applied only in a small number of libraries, mainly in Tuscany, rohere most GRIS members are located. A new project is now attempting to blend the traditional authority of the Soggettario with the more advanced principles of GRIS. A working group has been formed with people from BNCF, GRIS, and others, to study the feasibility of a renewal of the Soggettario. The group produced a report book in 2002, specifying the desirable features of the new system, and is at present searching for grants to implement it.
  5. Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009) 0.01 
    0.012157066 = product of:
  0.024314132 = sum of:
    0.024314132 = product of:
      0.048628263 = sum of:
        0.048628263 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048628263 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. MacEwan, A.: Crossing language barriers in Europe : Linking LCSH to other subject heading languages (2000) 0.01 
    0.010420342 = product of:
  0.020840684 = sum of:
    0.020840684 = product of:
      0.041681368 = sum of:
        0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041681368 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:10
  7. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.01 
    0.010420342 = product of:
  0.020840684 = sum of:
    0.020840684 = product of:
      0.041681368 = sum of:
        0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041681368 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
  8. O'Neill, E.T.; Chan, L.M.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; El-Hoshy, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Form subdivisions : their identification and use in LCSH (2001) 0.01 
    0.010420342 = product of:
  0.020840684 = sum of:
    0.020840684 = product of:
      0.041681368 = sum of:
        0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041681368 = score(doc=2205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2205)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.01 
    0.010420342 = product of:
  0.020840684 = sum of:
    0.020840684 = product of:
      0.041681368 = sum of:
        0.041681368 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041681368 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
  10. Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not? : a new view of the old question (2009) 0.01 
    0.008683619 = product of:
  0.017367238 = sum of:
    0.017367238 = product of:
      0.034734476 = sum of:
        0.034734476 = weight(_text_:22 in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034734476 = score(doc=3611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17955218 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 6.2010 14:22:43
  11. Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007) 0.01 
    0.006400974 = product of:
  0.012801948 = sum of:
    0.012801948 = product of:
      0.025603896 = sum of:
        0.025603896 = weight(_text_:report in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025603896 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24374367 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05127382 = queryNorm
            0.10504435 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7537646 = idf(docFreq=1035, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 34(2007) no.1, S.58-60 (P. Buizza): "This Nuovo soggettario is the first sign of subject indexing renewal in Italy. Italian subject indexing has been based until now on Soggettario per i cataloghi delle biblioteche italiane (Firenze, 1956), a list of preferred terms and see references, with suitable hierarchical subdivisions and cross references, derived from the subject catalogue of the National Library in Florence (BNCF). New headings later used in Bibliografia nazionale italiana (BNI) were added without references, nor indeed with any real maintenance. Systematic instructions on how to combine the terms are lacking: the indexer using this instrument is obliged to infer the order of terms absent from the lists by consulting analogous entries. Italian libraries are suffering from the limits of this subject catalogue: vocabulary is inadequate, obsolete and inconsistent, the syndetic structure incomplete and inaccurate, and the syntax ill-defined, poorly explained and unable to reflect complex subjects. In the nineties, the Subject Indexing Research Group (Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto, GRIS) of the AIB (Italian Library Association) developed the indexing theory and some principles of PRECIS and drew up guidelines based on consistent principles for vocabulary, semantic relationships and subject string construction, the latter according to role syntax (Guida 1997). In overhauling the Soggettario, the National Library in Florence aimed at a comprehensive indexing system. (A report on the method and evolution of the work has been published in Knowledge Organization (Lucarelli 2005), while the feasibility study is available in Italian (Per un nuovo Soggettario 2002). Any usable terms from the old Soggettario will be transferred to the new system, while taking into consideration international norms and interlinguistic compatibility, as well as applications outside the immediate library context. The terms will be accessible via a suitable OPAC operating on the most advanced software.

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes