Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.04
    0.035590567 = product of:
      0.07118113 = sum of:
        0.07118113 = product of:
          0.14236227 = sum of:
            0.14236227 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14236227 = score(doc=3008,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.7177252 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.029785926 = product of:
      0.05957185 = sum of:
        0.05957185 = product of:
          0.1191437 = sum of:
            0.1191437 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1191437 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  3. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.028082438 = product of:
      0.056164876 = sum of:
        0.056164876 = product of:
          0.11232975 = sum of:
            0.11232975 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11232975 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  4. Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997) 0.03
    0.025166333 = product of:
      0.050332665 = sum of:
        0.050332665 = product of:
          0.10066533 = sum of:
            0.10066533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10066533 = score(doc=131,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
  5. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.024572134 = product of:
      0.049144268 = sum of:
        0.049144268 = product of:
          0.098288536 = sum of:
            0.098288536 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098288536 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  6. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02
    0.024572134 = product of:
      0.049144268 = sum of:
        0.049144268 = product of:
          0.098288536 = sum of:
            0.098288536 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098288536 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  7. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02
    0.024572134 = product of:
      0.049144268 = sum of:
        0.049144268 = product of:
          0.098288536 = sum of:
            0.098288536 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098288536 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  8. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.024572134 = product of:
      0.049144268 = sum of:
        0.049144268 = product of:
          0.098288536 = sum of:
            0.098288536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098288536 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  9. Duncan, D.: IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) and Division of Bibliographic Control reports on activities 1994-1995 : Section on Classification and Indexing (1996) 0.02
    0.023727044 = product of:
      0.04745409 = sum of:
        0.04745409 = product of:
          0.09490818 = sum of:
            0.09490818 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09490818 = score(doc=4927,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.47848347 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the work of the Section on Classification and Indexing, covering the working group on principles underlying subject heading languages; a state of the art survey of subject heading systems; requirements for a format for classification data; DDC edition 20; open programs at the Istanbul conference; the section newsletter; and cooperative projects
  10. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.02
    0.021061828 = product of:
      0.042123657 = sum of:
        0.042123657 = product of:
          0.08424731 = sum of:
            0.08424731 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08424731 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  11. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.019857284 = product of:
      0.039714567 = sum of:
        0.039714567 = product of:
          0.079429135 = sum of:
            0.079429135 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079429135 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  12. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.019857284 = product of:
      0.039714567 = sum of:
        0.039714567 = product of:
          0.079429135 = sum of:
            0.079429135 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079429135 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  13. Simmons, P.: Converting UNIMARC records to CCF (1989) 0.02
    0.017795283 = product of:
      0.035590567 = sum of:
        0.035590567 = product of:
          0.07118113 = sum of:
            0.07118113 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07118113 = score(doc=2515,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.3588626 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    One of the primary goals of Unesco's Common Communication Format (CCF) has been to maintain compatibility between two major information communities: libraries; and abstracting and indexing organisations. While abstracting and indexing organisations do not follow any single standard for description or the structure and encoding of machine records, libraries have clearly defined standards and practices. Among CCF-using organisations are some that wish to incorporate records produced by national bibliographic agencies, especially national libraries, into their own data bases. They need the ability to convert UNIMARC records to CCF. To accomplish this they require a source of records, a computer to process them, a computer programm designed for record conversion and a table or instructions laying out the specific way in which each UNIMARC data element is to be processed in the course of conversion to CCF. Examines the factors to be considered in planning a table that would be sufficiently detailed to accomplish record conversion, and outlines problems that might be encountered.
  14. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.02
    0.017551525 = product of:
      0.03510305 = sum of:
        0.03510305 = product of:
          0.0702061 = sum of:
            0.0702061 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0702061 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  15. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.02
    0.017551525 = product of:
      0.03510305 = sum of:
        0.03510305 = product of:
          0.0702061 = sum of:
            0.0702061 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0702061 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  16. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.02
    0.017375123 = product of:
      0.034750246 = sum of:
        0.034750246 = product of:
          0.06950049 = sum of:
            0.06950049 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06950049 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  17. Shaw, D.: Automating access to bibliographic information (1996) 0.02
    0.016777555 = product of:
      0.03355511 = sum of:
        0.03355511 = product of:
          0.06711022 = sum of:
            0.06711022 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06711022 = score(doc=4351,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 4351, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Contrasts early in house automation efforts, such as the development of the MARC format and bibliographic utilities, with the creation of databases by abstracting and indexing services. Concludes that today's attempts to provide unified bibliographic access to the library's entire collection must find ways to integrate this plethora of independently developed access tools
  18. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
  19. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
  20. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68

Years

Languages

  • e 49
  • d 12
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 55
  • s 4
  • b 2
  • el 2
  • m 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…