Search (51 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  1. Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000) 0.05
    0.053932853 = product of:
      0.107865706 = sum of:
        0.107865706 = sum of:
          0.05872144 = weight(_text_:indexing in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05872144 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
          0.049144268 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049144268 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:37:55
  2. Woldering, B.: Europeana - mehrsprachiger Zugang zu Europas digitalem Kulturerbe (2008) 0.05
    0.046228163 = product of:
      0.092456326 = sum of:
        0.092456326 = sum of:
          0.050332665 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050332665 = score(doc=2199,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 2199, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2199)
          0.042123657 = weight(_text_:22 in 2199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042123657 = score(doc=2199,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2199, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:11:35
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  3. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.04
    0.038523465 = product of:
      0.07704693 = sum of:
        0.07704693 = sum of:
          0.041943885 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041943885 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.03510305 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03510305 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this study was to examine user tags that describe digitized archival collections in the field of humanities. A collection of 8,310 tags from a digital portal (Nineteenth-Century Electronic Scholarship, NINES) was analyzed to find out what attributes of primary historical resources users described with tags. Tags were categorized to identify which tags describe the content of the resource, the resource itself, and subjective aspects (e.g., usage or emotion). The study's findings revealed that over half were content-related; tags representing opinion, usage context, or self-reference, however, reflected only a small percentage. The study further found that terms related to genre or physical format of a resource were frequently used in describing primary archival resources. It was also learned that nontextual resources had lower numbers of content-related tags and higher numbers of document-related tags than textual resources and bibliographic materials; moreover, textual resources tended to have more user-context-related tags than other resources. These findings help explain users' tagging behavior and resource interpretation in primary resources in the humanities. Such information provided through tags helps information professionals decide to what extent indexing archival and cultural resources should be done for resource description and discovery, and understand users' terminology.
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  4. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02
    0.024821604 = product of:
      0.049643207 = sum of:
        0.049643207 = product of:
          0.099286415 = sum of:
            0.099286415 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099286415 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  5. Subject gateways (2000) 0.02
    0.024572134 = product of:
      0.049144268 = sum of:
        0.049144268 = product of:
          0.098288536 = sum of:
            0.098288536 = weight(_text_:22 in 6483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.098288536 = score(doc=6483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:43:01
  6. Stempfhuber, M.; Zapilko, B.: Modelling text-fact-integration in digital libraries (2009) 0.02
    0.02179468 = product of:
      0.04358936 = sum of:
        0.04358936 = product of:
          0.08717872 = sum of:
            0.08717872 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08717872 = score(doc=3393,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.4395151 = fieldWeight in 3393, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Digital Libraries currently face the challenge of integrating many different types of research information (e.g. publications, primary data, expert's profiles, institutional profiles, project information etc.) according to their scientific users' needs. To date no general, integrated model for knowledge organization and retrieval in Digital Libraries exists. This causes the problem of structural and semantic heterogeneity due to the wide range of metadata standards, indexing vocabularies and indexing approaches used for different types of information. The research presented in this paper focuses on areas in which activities are being undertaken in the field of Digital Libraries in order to treat semantic interoperability problems. We present a model for the integrated retrieval of factual and textual data which combines multiple approaches to semantic interoperability und sets them into context. Embedded in the research cycle, traditional content indexing methods for publications meet the newer, but rarely used ontology-based approaches which seem to be better suited for representing complex information like the one contained in survey data. The benefits of our model are (1) easy re-use of available knowledge organisation systems and (2) reduced efforts for domain modelling with ontologies.
  7. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.02
    0.021061828 = product of:
      0.042123657 = sum of:
        0.042123657 = product of:
          0.08424731 = sum of:
            0.08424731 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08424731 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
  8. Lim, E.: Southeast Asian subject gateways : an examination of their classification practices (2000) 0.02
    0.021061828 = product of:
      0.042123657 = sum of:
        0.042123657 = product of:
          0.08424731 = sum of:
            0.08424731 = weight(_text_:22 in 6040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08424731 = score(doc=6040,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6040, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:47
  9. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.02
    0.017551525 = product of:
      0.03510305 = sum of:
        0.03510305 = product of:
          0.0702061 = sum of:
            0.0702061 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0702061 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  10. Internet searching and indexing : the subject approach (2000) 0.02
    0.016777555 = product of:
      0.03355511 = sum of:
        0.03355511 = product of:
          0.06711022 = sum of:
            0.06711022 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06711022 = score(doc=1468,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 1468, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1468)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Hudon, M.: Subject access to Web resources in education (2003) 0.02
    0.016777555 = product of:
      0.03355511 = sum of:
        0.03355511 = product of:
          0.06711022 = sum of:
            0.06711022 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06711022 = score(doc=3958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.3383389 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  12. Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cunliffe, D.: Compound descriptors in context : a matching function for classifications and thesauri (2002) 0.01
    0.014829404 = product of:
      0.029658807 = sum of:
        0.029658807 = product of:
          0.059317615 = sum of:
            0.059317615 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059317615 = score(doc=3179,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 3179, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3179)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    There are many advantages for Digital Libraries in indexing with classifications or thesauri, but some current disincentive in the lack of flexible retrieval tools that deal with compound descriptors. This paper discusses a matching function for compound descriptors, or multi-concept subject headings, that does not rely an exact matching but incorporates term expansion via thesaurus semantic relationships to produce ranked results that take account of missing and partially matching terms. The matching function is based an a measure of semantic closeness between terms, which has the potential to help with recall problems. The work reported is part of the ongoing FACET project in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry and its collections database. The architecture of the prototype system and its Interface are outlined. The matching problem for compound descriptors is reviewed and the FACET implementation described. Results are discussed from scenarios using the faceted Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus. We argue that automatic traversal of thesaurus relationships can augment the user's browsing possibilities. The techniques can be applied both to unstructured multi-concept subject headings and potentially to more syntactically structured strings. The notion of a focus term is used by the matching function to model AAT modified descriptors (noun phrases). The relevance of the approach to precoordinated indexing and matching faceted strings is discussed.
  13. Slavic, A.: UDC in subject gateways : experiment or opportunity? (2006) 0.01
    0.014829404 = product of:
      0.029658807 = sum of:
        0.029658807 = product of:
          0.059317615 = sum of:
            0.059317615 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059317615 = score(doc=4879,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 4879, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4879)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper gives a short overview of the history of use of UDC in Internet subject gateways (SGs) with an English interface, from 1993 to 2006. There were in total, nine quality controlled SGs that were functional for shorter or longer periods of time. Their typology and functionality is described. Quality SGs have evolved and the role of classification has changed accordingly from supporting subject organization on the interface and automatic categorization of resources, towards supporting a semantic linking, control and vocabulary mapping between different indexing systems in subject hubs and federated SGs. In this period, many SGs ceased to exist and little information remains available regarding their status. SGs currently using UDC, for some part of their resource organization, do not use a UDC subject hierarchy at the interface and its role in resource indexing has become more difficult to observe. Since 2000, UDC has become more prevalent in East European SGs, portals and hubs, which are outside the scope of this research. This paper is an attempt to provide a record on this particular application of UDC and to offer some consideration of the changes in requirements when it comes to the use of library classification in resource discovery.
  14. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  15. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  16. Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:16
  17. Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:36:13
  18. Qin, J.; Chen, J.: ¬A multi-layered, multi-dimensional representation of digital educational resources (2003) 0.01
    0.012583166 = product of:
      0.025166333 = sum of:
        0.025166333 = product of:
          0.050332665 = sum of:
            0.050332665 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050332665 = score(doc=3818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 3818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  19. Doerr, M.; Gradmann, S.; Hennicke, S.; Isaac, A.; Meghini, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The Europeana Data Model (EDM) (2010) 0.01
    0.012583166 = product of:
      0.025166333 = sum of:
        0.025166333 = product of:
          0.050332665 = sum of:
            0.050332665 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050332665 = score(doc=3967,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 149. Information Technology, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing with Knowledge Management
  20. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.01
    0.012410802 = product of:
      0.024821604 = sum of:
        0.024821604 = product of:
          0.049643207 = sum of:
            0.049643207 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049643207 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22

Languages

  • e 33
  • d 18

Types

  • a 45
  • el 6
  • s 2
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…