Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.08
    0.082706496 = product of:
      0.16541299 = sum of:
        0.16541299 = sum of:
          0.12328933 = weight(_text_:indexing in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12328933 = score(doc=7244,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.6215682 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.042123657 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042123657 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051817898 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the principles of indexing and the intellectual skills involved in order to determine what automatic indexing systems would be required in order to supplant or complement the human indexer. Good indexing requires: considerable prior knowledge of the literature; judgement as to what to index and what depth to index; reading skills; abstracting skills; and classification skills, Illustrates these features with a detailed description of abstracting and indexing processes involved in generating entries for the mechanical engineering database POWERLINK. Briefly assesses the possibility of replacing human indexers with specialist indexing software, with particular reference to the Object Analyzer from the InTEXT automatic indexing system and using the criteria described for human indexers. At present, it is unlikely that the automatic indexer will replace the human indexer, but when more primary texts are available in electronic form, it may be a useful productivity tool for dealing with large quantities of low grade texts (should they be wanted in the database)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  2. Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993) 0.05
    0.053055286 = product of:
      0.10611057 = sum of:
        0.10611057 = product of:
          0.21222115 = sum of:
            0.21222115 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21222115 = score(doc=5540,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                1.0699216 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of UK developments in indexing and abstracting druing the period 1986-1990 covering: bibliographies of indexing and abstracting; British standards (including the revised British Standard on indexing, BS 3700); Wheatley Medal and Carey Award; a list of indexes published during this period; the role of the computer and automatic indexing; hypermedia; PRECIS; POPSI, relational indexing; thesauri; education and training; the indexing process, newspaper indexing; fiction indexes; the indexing profession; and a review of abstracting and indexing services
  3. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.05
    0.05188172 = product of:
      0.10376344 = sum of:
        0.10376344 = product of:
          0.20752688 = sum of:
            0.20752688 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20752688 = score(doc=4141,freq=34.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                1.0462552 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
                  5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                    34.0 = termFreq=34.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Indexing principles, Indexing practice, Precoordinate indexes, Consistency of indexing, Quality of indexing, Abstracts: types and functions, Writing the Abstract, Evaluation aspects, Approaches used in indexing and abstracting services, Enhancing the indexing, On the indexing and abstracting of imaginative works, Indexing multimedia sources, Texte searching, Automatic indexing, automatic abstracting, and related procedures, Indexing and the Internet, The future of indexing and abstracting, exercises in indexing and abstracting
    LCSH
    Indexing
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Subject
    Indexing
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
  4. Cleveland, D.B.; Cleveland, A.D.: Introduction to abstracting and indexing (2001) 0.05
    0.046894692 = product of:
      0.093789384 = sum of:
        0.093789384 = product of:
          0.18757877 = sum of:
            0.18757877 = weight(_text_:indexing in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18757877 = score(doc=316,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.94568604 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Indexing
    RSWK
    Indexing / Abstracting (GBV)
    Subject
    Indexing / Abstracting (GBV)
    Indexing
  5. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1991) 0.04
    0.04404108 = product of:
      0.08808216 = sum of:
        0.08808216 = product of:
          0.17616431 = sum of:
            0.17616431 = weight(_text_:indexing in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17616431 = score(doc=752,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.8881396 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    COMPASS
    Indexing
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: Pre-coordinate indexes; consistency of indexing: quality of indexing; abstracts: types and functions, writing the abstract, natural language in information retrieval, automatic indexing. There are exercises in both indexing and abstracting procedures
    LCSH
    Indexing
    Subject
    Indexing
    Indexing
  6. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003) 0.04
    0.04358936 = product of:
      0.08717872 = sum of:
        0.08717872 = product of:
          0.17435744 = sum of:
            0.17435744 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17435744 = score(doc=4913,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.8790302 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Covers: indexing principles and practice; precoordinate indexes; consistency and quality of indexing; types and functions of abstracts; writing an abstract; evaluation theory and practice; approaches used in indexing and abstracting services; indexing enhancement; natural language in information retrieval; indexing and abstracting of imaginative works; databases of images and sound; automatic indexing and abstracting; the future of indexing and abstracting services
    LCSH
    Indexing
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Subject
    Indexing
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
  7. Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995) 0.04
    0.037515752 = product of:
      0.075031504 = sum of:
        0.075031504 = product of:
          0.15006301 = sum of:
            0.15006301 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15006301 = score(doc=2926,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.7565488 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
  8. Cleveland, D.B.; Cleveland, A.D.: Introduction to abstracting and indexing (1990) 0.04
    0.037515752 = product of:
      0.075031504 = sum of:
        0.075031504 = product of:
          0.15006301 = sum of:
            0.15006301 = weight(_text_:indexing in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15006301 = score(doc=317,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.7565488 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    LCSH
    Indexing
    RSWK
    Indexing / Abstracting (GBV)
    Subject
    Indexing / Abstracting (GBV)
    Indexing
  9. Parekh, R.L.: Advanced indexing and abstracting practices (2000) 0.04
    0.035590567 = product of:
      0.07118113 = sum of:
        0.07118113 = product of:
          0.14236227 = sum of:
            0.14236227 = weight(_text_:indexing in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14236227 = score(doc=119,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.7177252 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing and abstracting are not activities that should be looked upon as ends in themselves. It is the results of these activities that should be evaluated and this can only be done within the context of a particular database, whether in printed or machine-readable form. In this context, the indexing can be judged successful if it allows searchers to locate items they want without having to look at many they do not want. This book intended primarily as a text to be used in teaching indexing and abstracting of Library and information science. It is an immense value to all individuals and institutions involved in information retrieval and related activities, including librarians, managers of information centres and database producers.
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Indexing and Abstracting 2. Automatic Indexing and Automatic Abstracting 3. Principles of Indexing 4.Periodicals Listing and Accessioning 5. Online Computer Service 6. Dialog, Searching and Bibliographic Display 7. Books 8. Bibliographic Control 9. Abstracting Functions 10. Acquisition System 11. Future of Indexing and Abstracting Services
  10. Abstracting and indexing services in perspective : Miles Conrad memorial lectures 1969-1983. Commemorating the twenty-fifth anniversary of the National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services (1983) 0.03
    0.03355511 = product of:
      0.06711022 = sum of:
        0.06711022 = product of:
          0.13422044 = sum of:
            0.13422044 = weight(_text_:indexing in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13422044 = score(doc=689,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: BAKER, D.B.: Abstracting and indexing services: past, present, and future; KENNEDY, H.E.: A perspective on fifteen years in the abstracting and indexing field; WEIL, B.H.: Will abstracts survive technological developments? and will "cheaper is better" win out?; KILGOUR, F.G.: Comparative development of abstracting and indexing, and monograph cataloging; ROWLETT, R.J.: Abstracts, who needs them?
  11. Wellisch, H.H.: Indexing and abstracting 1977-1981 : an international bibliography (1984) 0.03
    0.025166333 = product of:
      0.050332665 = sum of:
        0.050332665 = product of:
          0.10066533 = sum of:
            0.10066533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10066533 = score(doc=1453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 1453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989) 0.02
    0.020971943 = product of:
      0.041943885 = sum of:
        0.041943885 = product of:
          0.08388777 = sum of:
            0.08388777 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08388777 = score(doc=3549,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.42292362 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a theoretical model, based on the Flower/Hayes model of expository writing, of the process involved in content analysis for abstracting and indexing.
  13. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.02
    0.017551525 = product of:
      0.03510305 = sum of:
        0.03510305 = product of:
          0.0702061 = sum of:
            0.0702061 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0702061 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  14. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.01
    0.014041219 = product of:
      0.028082438 = sum of:
        0.028082438 = product of:
          0.056164876 = sum of:
            0.056164876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056164876 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  15. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.01
    0.010530914 = product of:
      0.021061828 = sum of:
        0.021061828 = product of:
          0.042123657 = sum of:
            0.042123657 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042123657 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  16. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.01
    0.010530914 = product of:
      0.021061828 = sum of:
        0.021061828 = product of:
          0.042123657 = sum of:
            0.042123657 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042123657 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  17. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.01
    0.008775762 = product of:
      0.017551525 = sum of:
        0.017551525 = product of:
          0.03510305 = sum of:
            0.03510305 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03510305 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
  18. Cross, C.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬A genre analysis of scientific abstracts (2006) 0.01
    0.008388777 = product of:
      0.016777555 = sum of:
        0.016777555 = product of:
          0.03355511 = sum of:
            0.03355511 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03355511 = score(doc=5603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051817898 = queryNorm
                0.16916946 = fieldWeight in 5603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to analyse the structure of a small number of abstracts that have appeared in the CABI database over a number of years, during which time the authorship of the abstracts changed from CABI editorial staff to journal article authors themselves. This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology in an effort to discover whether these abstracts followed generally agreed abstracting guidelines. Design/methodology/approach - The method adopted was a move analysis of the text of the abstracts. This move analysis revealed a five-move pattern: move 1 situates the research within the scientific community; move 2 introduces the research by either describing the main features of the research or presenting its purpose; move 3 describes the methodology; move 4 states the results; and move 5 draws conclusions or suggests practical applications. Findings - Thematic analysis shows that scientific abstract authors thematise their subject by referring to the discourse domain or the "real" world. Not all of the abstracts succeeded in following the guideline advice. However, there was general consistency regarding semantic organisation and thematic structure. Research limitations/implications - The research limitations were the small number of abstracts examined, from just one subject domain. Practical limitations - The practical implications are the need for abstracting services to be clearer and more prescriptive regarding how they want abstracts to be structured as the lack of formal training in abstract writing increases the risk of subjectivity and verbosity and reduces clarity in scientific abstracts. Another implication of the research are that abstracting and indexing services must ensure that they maintain abstract quality if they introduce policies of accepting author abstracts. This is important as there is probably little formal training in abstract writing for science students at present. Recommendations for further research are made. Originality/value - This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology.