-
Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960)
0.09
0.092456326 = product of:
0.18491265 = sum of:
0.18491265 = sum of:
0.10066533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10066533 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.08424731 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08424731 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
-
Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015)
0.05
0.053932853 = product of:
0.107865706 = sum of:
0.107865706 = sum of:
0.05872144 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05872144 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
0.049144268 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049144268 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The object of this literature review is to provide a historical perspective of R and D work in the area of Knowledge Organization (KO). This overview/summarization will provide information on major areas of KO. Journal articles published in core areas of KO: (Classification, Indexing, Thesauri and Taxonomies, Internet and Subject approach to information in the electronic era and Ontologies will be predominantly covered in this literature review. Coverage in this overview may not be completely exhaustive, but it succinctly showcases major developments in the area of KO. This review is a good source of additional reading material on KO apart from prescribed reading material on KO
- Date
- 22. 6.2015 16:13:38
-
Cawkell, A.E.: Indexing collections of electronic images : a review (1993)
0.05
0.04745409 = product of:
0.09490818 = sum of:
0.09490818 = product of:
0.18981636 = sum of:
0.18981636 = weight(_text_:indexing in 8313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18981636 = score(doc=8313,freq=16.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.95696694 = fieldWeight in 8313, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8313)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses articles in which indexing of image collections receives virtually no mention and continues with comments about articles in which indexing receives special attention. Describes four major indexing systems: Library of Congress, AAT, ICONCLASS and TELCLASS. Discusses new indexing approaches where the use of descriptive words is being replaced by other methods of retrieval. Describes indexing by content (attempting to match an input image to a database collection) and by using a visual thesaurus. Raises questions about indexing for various kinds of collections and discusses indexing philosophy
-
Devadason, F.J.: Computerized Deep Structure Indexing System (1986)
0.03
0.03355511 = product of:
0.06711022 = sum of:
0.06711022 = product of:
0.13422044 = sum of:
0.13422044 = weight(_text_:indexing in 809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13422044 = score(doc=809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hjerppe, R.: ¬An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis (1980)
0.03
0.03355511 = product of:
0.06711022 = sum of:
0.06711022 = product of:
0.13422044 = sum of:
0.13422044 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13422044 = score(doc=1115,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 1115, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1115)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Theme
- Citation indexing
-
Craven, T.C.: Research in document classification and indexing (Canada) 1971-1980 (1981)
0.03
0.03355511 = product of:
0.06711022 = sum of:
0.06711022 = product of:
0.13422044 = sum of:
0.13422044 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13422044 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Cleverdon, C.W.: Aslib Cranfield research project : report on the testing and analysis of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1962)
0.03
0.03355511 = product of:
0.06711022 = sum of:
0.06711022 = product of:
0.13422044 = sum of:
0.13422044 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13422044 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Sykes, J.: ¬The value of indexing : a white paper prepared for Factiva, Factiva, a Dow Jones and Reuters Company (2001)
0.03
0.03138793 = product of:
0.06277586 = sum of:
0.06277586 = product of:
0.12555172 = sum of:
0.12555172 = weight(_text_:indexing in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12555172 = score(doc=720,freq=28.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.6329741 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Finding particular documents after they have been reviewed and stored has been a challenge since the advent of the printed word. "Findability" is emphatically more important as we deal with information overload in general and with the specific need to quickly find relevant background information to support business decisions in a networked environment. Because time is arguably the most valuable asset in today's economy, information users value tools that help them (1) quickly find the information they are seeking and (2) manage the quantity and quality of information they manipulate and work with on a regular basis. Although the term "indexing" may lack the cachet of some other terms we use to describe current information organization and management concepts, indexing is fundamental to precise information organization and retrieval, especially when dealing with large sets of documents. Power users find great value in using a known, granular indexing language that can surface the most relevant items and filter out items of peripheral or no interest. Web architects and interface designers can likewise take advantage of indexing labels to present only the information meeting certain requirements for users who do not wish to learn the indexing structure or taxonomy. The user finds what is needed while the indexing language is used behind the scenes and is transparent to the user.
The importance of indexing in developing a content navigation strategy for corporate intranets or portals and the value of high-quality indexing when retrieving information from external resources are reviewed in this white paper. Some general background information on indexing and the use of controlled vocabularies (or taxonomies) are included for a historical perspective. Factiva Intelligent Indexing-which incorporates the best indexing expertise from both Dow Jones Interactive and Reuters Business Briefing-is described, along with some novel customer applications that take advantage of Factiva's indexing to create or improve information products delivered to users. Examples from the Excite and Google web search engines and from Dow Jones Interactive and Reuters Business Briefing are included in an Appendix section to illustrate how indexing influences the amount and quality of information retrieved in a specific search.
-
Cleverdon, C.W.; Mills, J.; Keen, M.: Factors determining the performance of indexing systems : ASLIB Cranfield research project (1966)
0.03
0.02936072 = product of:
0.05872144 = sum of:
0.05872144 = product of:
0.11744288 = sum of:
0.11744288 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11744288 = score(doc=5363,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.5920931 = fieldWeight in 5363, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5363)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Fuhr, N.: Probabilistisches Indexing and Retrieval (1988)
0.03
0.02936072 = product of:
0.05872144 = sum of:
0.05872144 = product of:
0.11744288 = sum of:
0.11744288 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11744288 = score(doc=4829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.5920931 = fieldWeight in 4829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4829)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996)
0.03
0.028082438 = product of:
0.056164876 = sum of:
0.056164876 = product of:
0.11232975 = sum of:
0.11232975 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11232975 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1997 19:46:30
-
Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992)
0.03
0.025427131 = product of:
0.050854262 = sum of:
0.050854262 = product of:
0.101708524 = sum of:
0.101708524 = weight(_text_:indexing in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101708524 = score(doc=367,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.5127677 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The study of subject access to UK academic library catalogues was based on a questionnaires end out during Summer 1991. 86 out of a possible 110 questionnaires were returned. All universities and polytechniques now have OPACs which are progressing well towards comprehensive bibliographical coverage of their libraries' stocks. The MARC format is now widely used. Subject access strategies are usually based on either Library of Congress Subject Headings or inhouse indexing systems but almost half the OPACs studies have no separate subject searching option based on subject indexing is expensive and future subject indexing strategies are best based on pre-existing controlled vocabularies. Strategies authority control is essential. A limited range of software strategies is recommended including the need to limit search results
-
Freeman, R.R.: Research project for the evaluation of the UDC as the indexing language for a mechanized reference retrieval system : progress report for the period July 1, 1965 - Jan. 31, 1966 (1966)
0.03
0.025166333 = product of:
0.050332665 = sum of:
0.050332665 = product of:
0.10066533 = sum of:
0.10066533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10066533 = score(doc=3491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 3491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3491)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rickman, R.M.; Stonham, T.J.: Image database retrieval using neural networks (1994)
0.03
0.025166333 = product of:
0.050332665 = sum of:
0.050332665 = product of:
0.10066533 = sum of:
0.10066533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10066533 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports a study of the application of neural networks to the automatic subject indexing of images and to image database management systems (IDBMS)
-
Doyle, L.B.: Indexing and abstracting by association : Part 1 (1962)
0.03
0.025166333 = product of:
0.050332665 = sum of:
0.050332665 = product of:
0.10066533 = sum of:
0.10066533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10066533 = score(doc=1927,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 1927, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1927)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975)
0.02
0.024572134 = product of:
0.049144268 = sum of:
0.049144268 = product of:
0.098288536 = sum of:
0.098288536 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098288536 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks for libraries (1995)
0.02
0.024572134 = product of:
0.049144268 = sum of:
0.049144268 = product of:
0.098288536 = sum of:
0.098288536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098288536 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30.11.1995 20:53:22
-
Anderson, J.D.: Guidelines for indexes and related information retrieval devices (1997)
0.02
0.02179468 = product of:
0.04358936 = sum of:
0.04358936 = product of:
0.08717872 = sum of:
0.08717872 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08717872 = score(doc=3807,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.4395151 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This technical report provides guidelines for the content, organization, and presentation of indexes used for the retrieval of documents and parts of documents. It deals with the principles of indexing, regardless of the type of material indexed, the indexing method used (intellectual analysis, machine algorithm, or both), the medium of the index, or the method of presentation for searching. It emphasizes 4 processes essential for all indexes: comprehensive design, vocabulary management, and the provision of systax. It includes definitions of indexes and of their parts, attributes, and aspects; a uniform vocabulary; treatment of the nature and variety of indexes; and recommendations regarding the design, organization, and presentation of indexes. It does not suggest guidelines for every detail or technique of indexing. These can be determined for each index on the basis of factors covered in the technical report
-
British Library / FAST/Dewey Review Group: Consultation on subject indexing and classification standards applied by the British Library (2015)
0.02
0.02179468 = product of:
0.04358936 = sum of:
0.04358936 = product of:
0.08717872 = sum of:
0.08717872 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08717872 = score(doc=2810,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19835205 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.4395151 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- The Library is consulting with stakeholders concerning the potential impact of these proposals. No firm decisions have yet been taken regarding either of these standards. FAST 1. The British Library proposes to adopt FAST selectively to extend the scope of subject indexing of current and legacy content. 2. The British Library proposes to implement FAST as a replacement for LCSH in all current cataloguing, subject to mitigation of the risks identified above, in particular the question of sustainability. DDC 3. The British Library proposes to implement Abridged DDC selectively to extend the scope of subject indexing of current and legacy content.
-
Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995)
0.02
0.021061828 = product of:
0.042123657 = sum of:
0.042123657 = product of:
0.08424731 = sum of:
0.08424731 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08424731 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18145745 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051817898 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
