Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Pinto, M."
  1. Pinto, M.; Lancaster, F.W.: Abstracts and abstracting in knowledge discovery (1999) 0.06
    0.06382137 = product of:
      0.12764274 = sum of:
        0.12764274 = product of:
          0.25528547 = sum of:
            0.25528547 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25528547 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.8832879 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Pinto, M.: Abstracting/abstract adaptation to digital environments : research trends (2003) 0.05
    0.05470403 = product of:
      0.10940806 = sum of:
        0.10940806 = product of:
          0.21881612 = sum of:
            0.21881612 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 4446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21881612 = score(doc=4446,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.7571039 = fieldWeight in 4446, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The technological revolution is affecting the structure, form and content of documents, reducing the effectiveness of traditional abstracts that, to some extent, are inadequate to the new documentary conditions. Aims to show the directions in which abstracting/abstracts can evolve to achieve the necessary adequacy in the new digital environments. Three researching trends are proposed: theoretical, methodological and pragmatic. Theoretically, there are some needs for expanding the document concept, reengineering abstracting and designing interdisciplinary models. Methodologically, the trend is toward the structuring, automating and qualifying of the abstracts. Pragmatically, abstracts networking, combined with alternative and complementary models, open a new and promising horizon. Automating, structuring and qualifying abstracting/abstract offer some short-term prospects for progress. Concludes that reengineering, networking and visualising would be middle-term fruitful areas of research toward the full adequacy of abstracting in the new electronic age.
  3. Pinto, M.; Sales, D.: INFOLITRANS: a model for the development of information competence for translators (2008) 0.01
    0.008571556 = product of:
      0.017143112 = sum of:
        0.017143112 = product of:
          0.034286223 = sum of:
            0.034286223 = weight(_text_:22 in 1897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034286223 = score(doc=1897,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1897, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1897)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:18:22
  4. Pinto, M.: Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies (2016) 0.01
    0.0068572448 = product of:
      0.0137144895 = sum of:
        0.0137144895 = product of:
          0.027428979 = sum of:
            0.027428979 = weight(_text_:22 in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027428979 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22