Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.06
    0.062729806 = product of:
      0.12545961 = sum of:
        0.12545961 = sum of:
          0.09117339 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09117339 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05061213 = queryNorm
              0.31545997 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
          0.034286223 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034286223 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05061213 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
  2. Yi, K.; Beheshti, J.; Cole, C.; Leide, J.E.; Large, A.: User search behavior of domain-specific information retrieval systems : an analysis of the query logs from PsycINFO and ABC-Clio's Historical Abstracts/America: History and Life (2006) 0.04
    0.039479237 = product of:
      0.078958474 = sum of:
        0.078958474 = product of:
          0.15791695 = sum of:
            0.15791695 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15791695 = score(doc=197,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.54639274 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors report the findings of a study that analyzes and compares the query logs of PsycINFO for psychology and the two history databases of ABC-Clio: Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life to establish the sociological nature of information need, searching, and seeking in history versus psychology. Two problems are addressed: (a) What level of query log analysis - by individual query terms, by co-occurrence of word pairs, or by multiword terms (MWTs) - best serves as data for categorizing the queries to these two subject-bound databases; and (b) how can the differences in the nature of the queries to history versus psychology databases aid in our understanding of user search behavior and the information needs of their respective users. The authors conclude that MWTs provide the most effective snapshot of user searching behavior for query categorization. The MWTs to ABC-Clio indicate specific instances of historical events, people, and regions, whereas the MWTs to PsycINFO indicate concepts roughly equivalent to descriptors used by PsycINFO's own classification scheme. The average length of queries is 3.16 terms for PsycINFO and 3.42 for ABC-Clio, which breaks from findings for other reference and scholarly search engine studies, bringing query length closer in line to findings for general Web search engines like Excite.
    Object
    Historical Abstracts
  3. White, R.W.; Jose, J.M.; Ruthven, I.: ¬A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching (2003) 0.04
    0.039479237 = product of:
      0.078958474 = sum of:
        0.078958474 = product of:
          0.15791695 = sum of:
            0.15791695 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 1081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15791695 = score(doc=1081,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.54639274 = fieldWeight in 1081, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1081)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of the work described in this paper is to evaluate the influencing effects of query-biased summaries in web searching. For this purpose, a summarisation system has been developed, and a summary tailored to the user's query is generated automatically for each document retrieved. The system aims to provide both a better means of assessing document relevance than titles or abstracts typical of many web search result lists. Through visiting each result page at retrieval-time, the system provides the user with an idea of the current page content and thus deals with the dynamic nature of the web. To examine the effectiveness of this approach, a task-oriented, comparative evaluation between four different web retrieval systems was performed; two that use query-biased summarisation, and two that use the standard ranked titles/abstracts approach. The results from the evaluation indicate that query-biased summarisation techniques appear to be more useful and effective in helping users gauge document relevance than the traditional ranked titles/abstracts approach. The same methodology was used to compare the effectiveness of two of the web's major search engines; AltaVista and Google.
  4. Anderson, J.: Have users changed their style? : a survey of CD-ROM vs. OPAC product usage (1995) 0.03
    0.031910684 = product of:
      0.06382137 = sum of:
        0.06382137 = product of:
          0.12764274 = sum of:
            0.12764274 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 1853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12764274 = score(doc=1853,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.44164395 = fieldWeight in 1853, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1853)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a survey of the online searching techniques of 50 university students, undergraduate and graduate, using the OPAC and CD-ROM databases at the Hayden Library, Arizona State University. The type of searching, use of library staff and online help screens, exposure to library user training, and length of time at the terminal for citation versus abstract products were recorded and analyzed. Results indicate that: a balance of online help products and library staff interaction is needed when providing help for users; careful attention needs to be paid to increasing the number of terminals and connections as abstracts are added to the databases being offered on the networks; and that even with exposure to more advanced searching techniques, users till rely on simple subject searching to locate required materials
  5. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: End-user interaction with thesauri : an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection (2004) 0.03
    0.027352015 = product of:
      0.05470403 = sum of:
        0.05470403 = product of:
          0.10940806 = sum of:
            0.10940806 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10940806 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.37855196 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The use of thesaurus-enhanced search tools is an the increase. This paper provides an insight into end-users interaction with and perceptions of such tools. In particular the overlap between users' initial query formulation and thesaurus structures is investigated. This investigation involved the performance of genuine search tasks an the CAB Abstracts database by academic users in the domain of veterinary medicine. The perception of these users regarding the nature and usefulness of the terms suggested from the thesaurus during the search interaction is reported. The results indicated that around 80% of terms entered were matched either exactly or partially to thesaurus terms. Users found over 90% of the terms suggested to be close to their search topics and where terms were selected they indicated that around 50% were to support a 'narrowing down' activity. These findings have implications for the design of thesaurus-enhanced interfaces.
  6. Tenopir, C.; Levine, K.; Allard, S.; Christian, L.; Volentine, R.; Boehm, R.; Nichols, F.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Herman, E.; Watkinson, A.: Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age : results of an international questionnaire (2016) 0.03
    0.027352015 = product of:
      0.05470403 = sum of:
        0.05470403 = product of:
          0.10940806 = sum of:
            0.10940806 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10940806 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.37855196 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.
  7. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.02
    0.024000356 = product of:
      0.048000712 = sum of:
        0.048000712 = product of:
          0.096001424 = sum of:
            0.096001424 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096001424 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  8. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.024000356 = product of:
      0.048000712 = sum of:
        0.048000712 = product of:
          0.096001424 = sum of:
            0.096001424 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096001424 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  9. Pelzer, N.L.; Wiese, W.H.; Leysen, J.M.: Library use and information-seeking behavior of veterinary medical students revisited in the electronic environment (1998) 0.02
    0.022793347 = product of:
      0.045586694 = sum of:
        0.045586694 = product of:
          0.09117339 = sum of:
            0.09117339 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 2799) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09117339 = score(doc=2799,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.31545997 = fieldWeight in 2799, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2799)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey, conducted with vetrinary medical students at Iowa State University in 1997, to determine their general use of the Veterinary Medical Library and how they sought information in an electronic environment. Comparisons were made between this study and an ealier study (Bull. MLA 76(1988) no.4, S.328-333). Basic patterns of student activities in the library were found to be unchanged. The 1997 students used the library most frequently for photocopying, office supplies, and studying coursework; and they preferred textbooks and handouts for current information. However, a major shift was seen from the use of print indexes and abstracts in 1987 towards the use of computerized indexes and other electronic resources in 1997. 60% of the students reported using the Internet for current information. Overall use of electronic materials was highest among students receiving the problem based learning method of instruction. Most of the 1997 students indicated that electronic resources would be important for future education needs, particularly the wealth of information and services available on the Internet and WWW
  10. Lorigo, L.; Haridasan, M.; Brynjarsdóttir, H.; Xia, L.; Joachims, T.; Gay, G.; Granka, L.; Pellacini, F.; Pan, B.: Eye tracking and online search : lessons learned and challenges ahead (2008) 0.02
    0.022793347 = product of:
      0.045586694 = sum of:
        0.045586694 = product of:
          0.09117339 = sum of:
            0.09117339 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 1861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09117339 = score(doc=1861,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.31545997 = fieldWeight in 1861, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1861)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article surveys the use of eye tracking in investigations of online search. Three eye tracking experiments that we undertook are discussed and compared to additional work in this area, revealing recurring behaviors and trends. The first two studies are described in greater detail in Granka, Joachims, & Gay (2004), Lorigo et al. (2006), and Pan et al. (2007), and the third study is described for the first time in this article. These studies reveal how users view the ranked results on a search engine results page (SERP), the relationship between the search result abstracts viewed and those clicked on, and whether gender, search task, or search engine influence these behaviors. In addition, we discuss a key challenge that arose in all three studies that applies to the use of eye tracking in studying online behaviors which is due to the limited support for analyzing scanpaths, or sequences of eye fixations. To meet this challenge, we present a preliminary approach that involves a graphical visualization to compare a path with a group of paths. We conclude by summarizing our findings and discussing future work in further understanding online search behavior with the help of eye tracking.
  11. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.02
    0.020571733 = product of:
      0.041143466 = sum of:
        0.041143466 = product of:
          0.08228693 = sum of:
            0.08228693 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08228693 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  12. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01
    0.0137144895 = product of:
      0.027428979 = sum of:
        0.027428979 = product of:
          0.054857958 = sum of:
            0.054857958 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054857958 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  13. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.01
    0.0137144895 = product of:
      0.027428979 = sum of:
        0.027428979 = product of:
          0.054857958 = sum of:
            0.054857958 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054857958 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  14. Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006) 0.01
    0.0137144895 = product of:
      0.027428979 = sum of:
        0.027428979 = product of:
          0.054857958 = sum of:
            0.054857958 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054857958 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:17:44
  15. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.0137144895 = product of:
      0.027428979 = sum of:
        0.027428979 = product of:
          0.054857958 = sum of:
            0.054857958 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054857958 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  16. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  17. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
  18. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22
  19. Berger, F.C.; Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Van der Weide, T.P.: Supporting query by navigation (1996) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  20. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23

Years

Languages

  • e 39
  • d 2
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 42
  • b 1
  • More… Less…