Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.06
    0.062729806 = product of:
      0.12545961 = sum of:
        0.12545961 = sum of:
          0.09117339 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09117339 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05061213 = queryNorm
              0.31545997 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
          0.034286223 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034286223 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05061213 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
  2. Koike, A.; Takagi, T.: Knowledge discovery based on an implicit and explicit conceptual network (2007) 0.04
    0.039479237 = product of:
      0.078958474 = sum of:
        0.078958474 = product of:
          0.15791695 = sum of:
            0.15791695 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15791695 = score(doc=85,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.54639274 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The amount of knowledge accumulated in published scientific papers has increased due to the continuing progress being made in scientific research. Since numerous papers have only reported fragments of scientific facts, there are possibilities for discovering new knowledge by connecting these facts. We therefore developed a system called BioTermNet to draft a conceptual network with hybrid methods of information extraction and information retrieval. Two concepts are regarded as related in this system if (a) their relationship is clearly described in MEDLINE abstracts or (b) they have distinctively co-occurred in abstracts. PRIME data, including protein interactions and functions extracted by NLP techniques, are used in the former, and the Singhalmeasure for information retrieval is used in the latter. Relationships that are not clearly or directly described in an abstract can be extracted by connecting multiple concepts. To evaluate how well this system performs, Swanson's association between Raynaud's disease and fish oil and that between migraine and magnesium were tested with abstracts that had been published before the discovery of these associations. The result was that when start and end concepts were given, plausible and understandable intermediate concepts connecting them could be detected. When only the start concept was given, not only the focused concept (magnesium and fish oil) but also other probable concepts could be detected as related concept candidates. Finally, this system was applied to find diseases related to the BRCA1 gene. Some other new potentially related diseases were detected along with diseases whose relations to BRCA1 were already known.
  3. Ekmekcioglu, F.C.; Robertson, A.M.; Willett, P.: Effectiveness of query expansion in ranked-output document retrieval systems (1992) 0.04
    0.036469355 = product of:
      0.07293871 = sum of:
        0.07293871 = product of:
          0.14587742 = sum of:
            0.14587742 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 5689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14587742 = score(doc=5689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.50473595 = fieldWeight in 5689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an evaluation of 3 methods for the expansion of natural language queries in ranked output retrieval systems. The methods are based on term co-occurrence data, on Soundex codes, and on a string similarity measure. Searches for 110 queries in a data base of 26.280 titles and abstracts suggest that there is no significant difference in retrieval effectiveness between any of these methods and unexpanded searches
  4. Chen, H.; Martinez, J.; Kirchhoff, A.; Ng, T.D.; Schatz, B.R.: Alleviating search uncertainty through concept associations : automatic indexing, co-occurence analysis, and parallel computing (1998) 0.03
    0.027352015 = product of:
      0.05470403 = sum of:
        0.05470403 = product of:
          0.10940806 = sum of:
            0.10940806 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 5202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10940806 = score(doc=5202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.37855196 = fieldWeight in 5202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we report research on an algorithmic approach to alleviating search uncertainty in a large information space. Grounded on object filtering, automatic indexing, and co-occurence analysis, we performed a large-scale experiment using a parallel supercomputer (SGI Power Challenge) to analyze 400.000+ abstracts in an INSPEC computer engineering collection. Two system-generated thesauri, one based on a combined object filtering and automatic indexing method, and the other based on automatic indexing only, were compaed with the human-generated INSPEC subject thesaurus. Our user evaluation revealed that the system-generated thesauri were better than the INSPEC thesaurus in 'concept recall', but in 'concept precision' the 3 thesauri were comparable. Our analysis also revealed that the terms suggested by the 3 thesauri were complementary and could be used to significantly increase 'variety' in search terms the thereby reduce search uncertainty
  5. Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Houston, A.L.: Semantic indexing and searching using a Hopfield net (1998) 0.03
    0.027352015 = product of:
      0.05470403 = sum of:
        0.05470403 = product of:
          0.10940806 = sum of:
            0.10940806 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10940806 = score(doc=5704,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.37855196 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a neural network approach to document semantic indexing. Reports results of a study to apply a Hopfield net algorithm to simulate human associative memory for concept exploration in the domain of computer science and engineering. The INSPEC database, consisting of 320.000 abstracts from leading periodical articles was used as the document test bed. Benchmark tests conformed that 3 parameters: maximum number of activated nodes; maximum allowable error; and maximum number of iterations; were useful in positively influencing network convergence behaviour without negatively impacting central processing unit performance. Another series of benchmark tests was performed to determine the effectiveness of various filtering techniques in reducing the negative impact of noisy input terms. Preliminary user tests conformed expectations that the Hopfield net is potentially useful as an associative memory technique to improve document recall and precision by solving discrepancies between indexer vocabularies and end user vocabularies
  6. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: End-user interaction with thesauri : an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection (2004) 0.03
    0.027352015 = product of:
      0.05470403 = sum of:
        0.05470403 = product of:
          0.10940806 = sum of:
            0.10940806 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10940806 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.37855196 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The use of thesaurus-enhanced search tools is an the increase. This paper provides an insight into end-users interaction with and perceptions of such tools. In particular the overlap between users' initial query formulation and thesaurus structures is investigated. This investigation involved the performance of genuine search tasks an the CAB Abstracts database by academic users in the domain of veterinary medicine. The perception of these users regarding the nature and usefulness of the terms suggested from the thesaurus during the search interaction is reported. The results indicated that around 80% of terms entered were matched either exactly or partially to thesaurus terms. Users found over 90% of the terms suggested to be close to their search topics and where terms were selected they indicated that around 50% were to support a 'narrowing down' activity. These findings have implications for the design of thesaurus-enhanced interfaces.
  7. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.02
    0.024244022 = product of:
      0.048488043 = sum of:
        0.048488043 = product of:
          0.09697609 = sum of:
            0.09697609 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09697609 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
  8. Smeaton, A.F.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system (1983) 0.02
    0.024000356 = product of:
      0.048000712 = sum of:
        0.048000712 = product of:
          0.096001424 = sum of:
            0.096001424 = weight(_text_:22 in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096001424 = score(doc=2134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:32:22
  9. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.02
    0.017143112 = product of:
      0.034286223 = sum of:
        0.034286223 = product of:
          0.06857245 = sum of:
            0.06857245 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06857245 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  10. Kozikowski, P. et al.: Support of part-whole relations in query answering (2016) 0.02
    0.017143112 = product of:
      0.034286223 = sum of:
        0.034286223 = product of:
          0.06857245 = sum of:
            0.06857245 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06857245 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  11. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.02
    0.017143112 = product of:
      0.034286223 = sum of:
        0.034286223 = product of:
          0.06857245 = sum of:
            0.06857245 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06857245 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  12. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.02
    0.017143112 = product of:
      0.034286223 = sum of:
        0.034286223 = product of:
          0.06857245 = sum of:
            0.06857245 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06857245 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  13. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02
    0.016970815 = product of:
      0.03394163 = sum of:
        0.03394163 = product of:
          0.06788326 = sum of:
            0.06788326 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06788326 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
  14. ALA / Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee (1997) 0.02
    0.015955342 = product of:
      0.031910684 = sum of:
        0.031910684 = product of:
          0.06382137 = sum of:
            0.06382137 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06382137 = score(doc=1800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.22082198 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool
  15. Efthimiadis, E.N.: End-users' understanding of thesaural knowledge structures in interactive query expansion (1994) 0.01
    0.0137144895 = product of:
      0.027428979 = sum of:
        0.027428979 = product of:
          0.054857958 = sum of:
            0.054857958 = weight(_text_:22 in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054857958 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2001 13:35:22
  16. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  17. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  18. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  19. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie (2005) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 1852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=1852,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1852, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1852)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:58
  20. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.01
    0.012000178 = product of:
      0.024000356 = sum of:
        0.024000356 = product of:
          0.048000712 = sum of:
            0.048000712 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048000712 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05061213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25