Search (171 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.14 
    0.13966143 = product of:
  0.27932286 = sum of:
    0.27932286 = sum of:
      0.18234678 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18234678 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05061213 = queryNorm
          0.63091993 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.09697609 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09697609 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05061213 = queryNorm
          0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Arranged according to subjects the bibliography lists 79 references,mostly with terse abstracts.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.07 
    0.0669879 = product of:
  0.1339758 = sum of:
    0.1339758 = product of:
      0.4019274 = sum of:
        0.4019274 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4019274 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4290902 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.07 
    0.065289944 = product of:
  0.13057989 = sum of:
    0.13057989 = sum of:
      0.10315091 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10315091 = score(doc=1447,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05061213 = queryNorm
          0.3569022 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.027428979 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027428979 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05061213 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  4. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.05 
    0.05359032 = product of:
  0.10718064 = sum of:
    0.10718064 = product of:
      0.3215419 = sum of:
        0.3215419 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3215419 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4290902 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  5. Mas, S.; Zaher, L'H.; Zacklad, M.: Design & evaluation of multi-viewed knowledge system for administrative electronic document organization (2008) 0.04 
    0.036469355 = product of:
  0.07293871 = sum of:
    0.07293871 = product of:
      0.14587742 = sum of:
        0.14587742 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14587742 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.50473595 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.ebsi.umontreal.ca/isko2008/documents/abstracts/mas.pdf
  6. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.03 
    0.03349395 = product of:
  0.0669879 = sum of:
    0.0669879 = product of:
      0.2009637 = sum of:
        0.2009637 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2009637 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4290902 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  7. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.03 
    0.03349395 = product of:
  0.0669879 = sum of:
    0.0669879 = product of:
      0.2009637 = sum of:
        0.2009637 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2009637 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4290902 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  8. Collard, J.; Paiva, V. de; Fong, B.; Subrahmanian, E.: Extracting mathematical concepts from text (2022) 0.03 
    0.031910684 = product of:
  0.06382137 = sum of:
    0.06382137 = product of:
      0.12764274 = sum of:
        0.12764274 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12764274 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.44164395 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We investigate different systems for extracting mathematical entities from English texts in the mathematical field of category theory as a first step for constructing a mathematical knowledge graph. We consider four different term extractors and compare their results. This small experiment showcases some of the issues with the construction and evaluation of terms extracted from noisy domain text. We also make available two open corpora in research mathematics, in particular in category theory: a small corpus of 755 abstracts from the journal TAC (3188 sentences), and a larger corpus from the nLab community wiki (15,000 sentences).
  9. Information als Rohstoff für Innovation : Programm der Bundesregierung 1996-2000 (1996) 0.03 
    0.027428979 = product of:
  0.054857958 = sum of:
    0.054857958 = product of:
      0.109715916 = sum of:
        0.109715916 = weight(_text_:22 in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109715916 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:26:34
  10. Ask me[@sk.me]: your global information guide : der Wegweiser durch die Informationswelten (1996) 0.03 
    0.027428979 = product of:
  0.054857958 = sum of:
    0.054857958 = product of:
      0.109715916 = sum of:
        0.109715916 = weight(_text_:22 in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109715916 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30.11.1996 13:22:37
  11. Kosmos Weltatlas 2000 : Der Kompass für das 21. Jahrhundert. Inklusive Welt-Routenplaner (1999) 0.03 
    0.027428979 = product of:
  0.054857958 = sum of:
    0.054857958 = product of:
      0.109715916 = sum of:
        0.109715916 = weight(_text_:22 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109715916 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:39
  12. Mitchell, J.S.: DDC 22 : an introduction (2003) 0.03 
    0.026833216 = product of:
  0.05366643 = sum of:
    0.05366643 = product of:
      0.10733286 = sum of:
        0.10733286 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10733286 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.
    Object
    DDC-22
  13. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02 
    0.024244022 = product of:
  0.048488043 = sum of:
    0.048488043 = product of:
      0.09697609 = sum of:
        0.09697609 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09697609 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  14. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.02 
    0.024000356 = product of:
  0.048000712 = sum of:
    0.048000712 = product of:
      0.096001424 = sum of:
        0.096001424 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096001424 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  15. Vögel unserer Heimat (1999) 0.02 
    0.024000356 = product of:
  0.048000712 = sum of:
    0.048000712 = product of:
      0.096001424 = sum of:
        0.096001424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096001424 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7.11.1999 18:22:54
  16. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02 
    0.024000356 = product of:
  0.048000712 = sum of:
    0.048000712 = product of:
      0.096001424 = sum of:
        0.096001424 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096001424 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  17. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.02 
    0.024000356 = product of:
  0.048000712 = sum of:
    0.048000712 = product of:
      0.096001424 = sum of:
        0.096001424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096001424 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17723505 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  18. Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Simple, proven approaches to text retrieval (1997) 0.02 
    0.022793347 = product of:
  0.045586694 = sum of:
    0.045586694 = product of:
      0.09117339 = sum of:
        0.09117339 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 4532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09117339 = score(doc=4532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.31545997 = fieldWeight in 4532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4532)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This technical note describes straightforward techniques for document indexing and retrieval that have been solidly established through extensive testing and are easy to apply. They are useful for many different types of text material, are viable for very large files, and have the advantage that they do not require special skills or training for searching, but are easy for end users. The document and text retrieval methods described here have a sound theoretical basis, are well established by extensive testing, and the ideas involved are now implemented in some commercial retrieval systems. Testing in the last few years has, in particular, shown that the methods presented here work very well with full texts, not only title and abstracts, and with large files of texts containing three quarters of a million documents. These tests, the TREC Tests (see Harman 1993 - 1997; IP&M 1995), have been rigorous comparative evaluations involving many different approaches to information retrieval. These techniques depend an the use of simple terms for indexing both request and document texts; an term weighting exploiting statistical information about term occurrences; an scoring for request-document matching, using these weights, to obtain a ranked search output; and an relevance feedback to modify request weights or term sets in iterative searching. The normal implementation is via an inverted file organisation using a term list with linked document identifiers, plus counting data, and pointers to the actual texts. The user's request can be a word list, phrases, sentences or extended text.
  19. Oard, D.W.: Serving users in many languages : cross-language information retrieval for digital libraries (1997) 0.02 
    0.022793347 = product of:
  0.045586694 = sum of:
    0.045586694 = product of:
      0.09117339 = sum of:
        0.09117339 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 1261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09117339 = score(doc=1261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.31545997 = fieldWeight in 1261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1261)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We are rapidly constructing an extensive network infrastructure for moving information across national boundaries, but much remains to be done before linguistic barriers can be surmounted as effectively as geographic ones. Users seeking information from a digital library could benefit from the ability to query large collections once using a single language, even when more than one language is present in the collection. If the information they locate is not available in a language that they can read, some form of translation will be needed. At present, multilingual thesauri such as EUROVOC help to address this challenge by facilitating controlled vocabulary search using terms from several languages, and services such as INSPEC produce English abstracts for documents in other languages. On the other hand, support for free text searching across languages is not yet widely deployed, and fully automatic machine translation is presently neither sufficiently fast nor sufficiently accurate to adequately support interactive cross-language information seeking. An active and rapidly growing research community has coalesced around these and other related issues, applying techniques drawn from several fields - notably information retrieval and natural language processing - to provide access to large multilingual collections.
  20. Smiraglia, R.P.: Facets as discourse in knowledge organization : a case study in LISTA (2017) 0.02 
    0.022793347 = product of:
  0.045586694 = sum of:
    0.045586694 = product of:
      0.09117339 = sum of:
        0.09117339 = weight(_text_:abstracts in 3855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09117339 = score(doc=3855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2890173 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05061213 = queryNorm
            0.31545997 = fieldWeight in 3855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.7104354 = idf(docFreq=397, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Knowledge Organization Systems (KOSs) use arrays of related concepts to capture the ontological content of a domain; hierarchical structures are typical of such systems. Some KOSs also employ sets of crossconceptual descriptors that express different dimensions within a domain-facets. The recent increase in the prominence of facets and faceted systems has had major impact on the intension of the KO domain and this is visible in the domain's literature. An interesting question is how the discourse surrounding facets in KO and in related domains such as information science might be described. The present paper reports one case study in an ongoing research project to investigate the discourse of facets in KO. In this particular case, the formal current research literature represented by inclusion in the "Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts, Full Text" (LISTA) database is analyzed to discover aspects of the research front and its ongoing discourse concerning facets. A datasets of 1682 citations was analyzed. Results show thinking concerning information retrieval and the semantic web resides alongside implementation of faceted searching and the growth of faceted thesauri. Faceted classification remains important to the discourse, but the use of facet analysis is linked directly to applied aspects of information science.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 86
  • e 79
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 76
  • i 10
  • m 5
  • r 3
  • b 2
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects