Search (119 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Barjak, F.; Li, X.; Thelwall, M.: Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists' personal homepages? (2007) 0.06 
    0.061986778 = product of:
  0.123973556 = sum of:
    0.123973556 = product of:
      0.24794711 = sum of:
        0.24794711 = weight(_text_:homepage in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24794711 = score(doc=73,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.33761188 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.784232 = idf(docFreq=135, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.73441464 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.784232 = idf(docFreq=135, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In recent years, a considerable body of Webometric research has used hyperlinks to generate indicators for the impact of Web documents and the organizations that created them. The relationship between this Web impact and other, offline impact indicators has been explored for entire universities, departments, countries, and scientific journals, but not yet for individual scientists-an important omission. The present research closes this gap by investigating factors that may influence the Web impact (i.e., inlink counts) of scientists' personal homepages. Data concerning 456 scientists from five scientific disciplines in six European countries were analyzed, showing that both homepage content and personal and institutional characteristics of the homepage owners had significant relationships with inlink counts. A multivariate statistical analysis confirmed that full-text articles are the most linked-to content in homepages. At the individual homepage level, hyperlinks are related to several offline characteristics. Notable differences regarding total inlinks to scientists' homepages exist between the scientific disciplines and the countries in the sample. There also are both gender and age effects: fewer external inlinks (i.e., links from other Web domains) to the homepages of female and of older scientists. There is only a weak relationship between a scientist's recognition and homepage inlinks and, surprisingly, no relationship between research productivity and inlink counts. Contrary to expectations, the size of collaboration networks is negatively related to hyperlink counts. Some of the relationships between hyperlinks to homepages and the properties of their owners can be explained by the content that the homepage owners put on their homepage and their level of Internet use; however, the findings about productivity and collaborations do not seem to have a simple, intuitive explanation. Overall, the results emphasize the complexity of the phenomenon of Web linking, when analyzed at the level of individual pages.
  2. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.03 
    0.02696945 = product of:
  0.0539389 = sum of:
    0.0539389 = product of:
      0.1078778 = sum of:
        0.1078778 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1078778 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03 
    0.02696945 = product of:
  0.0539389 = sum of:
    0.0539389 = product of:
      0.1078778 = sum of:
        0.1078778 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1078778 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.03 
    0.02696945 = product of:
  0.0539389 = sum of:
    0.0539389 = product of:
      0.1078778 = sum of:
        0.1078778 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1078778 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  5. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.03 
    0.025305996 = product of:
  0.05061199 = sum of:
    0.05061199 = product of:
      0.10122398 = sum of:
        0.10122398 = weight(_text_:homepage in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10122398 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33761188 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.784232 = idf(docFreq=135, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.29982352 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.784232 = idf(docFreq=135, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ein britischer Forscher hat sich die Mühe gemacht, die geografischen Muster der Zitierungen von 1981 bis zur Gegenwart freizulegen. Das Ergebnis: Die publizistische Wahrnehmung ist in der Wissenschaft äußerst ungleich verteilt. Die USA dominieren mit großem Abstand vor dem Rest der WeIt. Und auch dort konzentrieren sich die Verweise auf einige wenige Ballungsräume der Forschung. Michael Batty vom Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis in London bediente sich für seine Analyse der Datenbank "ISIHighlyCited.com" (http: //www.isihighlycited.com/), in der Forscher aus verschiedenen Disziplinen aufgelistet werden, die die weltweit meisten Zitate auf sich gezogen haben. In diesen Ranglisten nehmen die akademischen Edelschmieden aus den USA etwa jene Rolle ein, die Österreichische Athleten im Alpinschisport besetzen. Einzig der Forschungsraum London kann mit der Konkurrenz aus Übersee halbwegs mithalten. Der Artikel "Citation Geography: It's About Location" von Michael Batty erschien im Magazin "The Scientist" (Band 17, Heft 16/10, Ausgabe vom 25.8.03; http://www.thescientist.com/yr2003/aug/opinion 030825.html). Die Zeitschrift ist nach individueller Registrierung frei zugänglich. Der Homepage des Autors http: //www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/citations/ können weitere Details entnommen werden. Ob die Anzahl derZitate auch etwas über die wissenschaftliche Qualität aussagt, ist genau so Gegenstand von Diskussionen, wie dies etwa bei den "Impact-Faktoren" von Journalen der Fall ist (vgl. "Kann wissenschaftliche Qualität gemessen werden?", http://science.orf.at/science/news/58648). Ganz wertfrei kann man die ISI-Daten jedenfalls dazu verwenden, um herauszufinden, in welchem Land, in welcher Stadt und in welcher Institution die meist zitierten Forscher dieses Erdballs sitzen. Das Ergebnis dieser von Michael Batty erstellten "Geografie derwissenschaftlichen Zitierung" ist eindeutig: Einige Wenige ziehen den Großteil der publizistischen Aufmerksamkeit auf sich - und lassen für den Rest nur wenig über. Diese Aussage gilt gleichermaßen für Ranglisten von Städten, Institutionen und Ländern. Und: In allen drei Fällen kommen die Spitzereiter aus dem US-amerikanischen Raum.
  6. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02 
    0.023837851 = product of:
  0.047675703 = sum of:
    0.047675703 = product of:
      0.095351405 = sum of:
        0.095351405 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095351405 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  7. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.023837851 = product of:
  0.047675703 = sum of:
    0.047675703 = product of:
      0.095351405 = sum of:
        0.095351405 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095351405 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  8. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02 
    0.023598269 = product of:
  0.047196537 = sum of:
    0.047196537 = product of:
      0.094393075 = sum of:
        0.094393075 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094393075 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  9. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02 
    0.023598269 = product of:
  0.047196537 = sum of:
    0.047196537 = product of:
      0.094393075 = sum of:
        0.094393075 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094393075 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02 
    0.023598269 = product of:
  0.047196537 = sum of:
    0.047196537 = product of:
      0.094393075 = sum of:
        0.094393075 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.094393075 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  11. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02 
    0.020227086 = product of:
  0.04045417 = sum of:
    0.04045417 = product of:
      0.08090834 = sum of:
        0.08090834 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08090834 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  12. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02 
    0.020227086 = product of:
  0.04045417 = sum of:
    0.04045417 = product of:
      0.08090834 = sum of:
        0.08090834 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08090834 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  13. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01 
    0.014302711 = product of:
  0.028605422 = sum of:
    0.028605422 = product of:
      0.057210844 = sum of:
        0.057210844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057210844 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  14. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.014302711 = product of:
  0.028605422 = sum of:
    0.028605422 = product of:
      0.057210844 = sum of:
        0.057210844 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057210844 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  15. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01 
    0.013484725 = product of:
  0.02696945 = sum of:
    0.02696945 = product of:
      0.0539389 = sum of:
        0.0539389 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0539389 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  16. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01 
    0.013484725 = product of:
  0.02696945 = sum of:
    0.02696945 = product of:
      0.0539389 = sum of:
        0.0539389 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0539389 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  17. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01 
    0.013484725 = product of:
  0.02696945 = sum of:
    0.02696945 = product of:
      0.0539389 = sum of:
        0.0539389 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0539389 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  18. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01 
    0.013484725 = product of:
  0.02696945 = sum of:
    0.02696945 = product of:
      0.0539389 = sum of:
        0.0539389 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0539389 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  19. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01 
    0.013484725 = product of:
  0.02696945 = sum of:
    0.02696945 = product of:
      0.0539389 = sum of:
        0.0539389 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0539389 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  20. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01 
    0.013484725 = product of:
  0.02696945 = sum of:
    0.02696945 = product of:
      0.0539389 = sum of:
        0.0539389 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0539389 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17426576 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0497642 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 109
  • d 9
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 117
  • m 2
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications