Search (54 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007) 0.05 
    0.05404014 = product of:
  0.08106021 = sum of:
    0.06007301 = weight(_text_:sites in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06007301 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.23103109 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
    0.0209872 = product of:
      0.0419744 = sum of:
        0.0419744 = weight(_text_:index in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0419744 = score(doc=533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.1931181 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Recently, a growing amount of systems that allow personal content annotation (tagging) are being created, ranging from personal sites for organising bookmarks (del.icio.us), photos (flickr.com) or videos (video.google.com, youtube.com) to systems for managing bibliographies for scientific research projects (citeulike.org, connotea.org). Simultaneously, a debate on the pro and cons of allowing users to add personal keywords to digital content has arisen. One recurrent point-of-discussion is whether tagging can solve the well-known vocabulary problem: In order to support successful retrieval in complex environments, it is necessary to index an object with a variety of aliases (cf. Furnas 1987). In this spirit, social tagging enhances the pool of rigid, traditional keywording by adding user-created retrieval vocabularies. Furthermore, tagging goes beyond simple personal content-based keywords by providing meta-keywords like funny or interesting that "identify qualities or characteristics" (Golder and Huberman 2006, Kipp and Campbell 2006, Kipp 2007, Feinberg 2006, Kroski 2005). Contrarily, tagging systems are claimed to lead to semantic difficulties that may hinder the precision and recall of tagging systems (e.g. the polysemy problem, cf. Marlow 2006, Lakoff 2005, Golder and Huberman 2006). Empirical research on social tagging is still rare and mostly from a computer linguistics or librarian point-of-view (Voß 2007) which focus either on the automatic statistical analyses of large data sets, or intellectually inspect single cases of tag usage: Some scientists studied the evolution of tag vocabularies and tag distribution in specific systems (Golder and Huberman 2006, Hammond 2005). Others concentrate on tagging behaviour and tagger characteristics in collaborative systems. (Hammond 2005, Kipp and Campbell 2007, Feinberg 2006, Sen 2006). However, little research has been conducted on the functional and linguistic characteristics of tags.1 An analysis of these patterns could show differences between user wording and conventional keywording. In order to provide a reasonable basis for comparison, a classification system for existing tags is needed.
  2. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.04 
    0.035965405 = product of:
  0.10789621 = sum of:
    0.10789621 = sum of:
      0.074200965 = weight(_text_:index in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.074200965 = score(doc=193,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049739745 = queryNorm
          0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
      0.033695243 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033695243 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049739745 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
  3. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.03 
    0.030722186 = product of:
  0.09216656 = sum of:
    0.09216656 = product of:
      0.27649966 = sum of:
        0.27649966 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27649966 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4216941 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  4. Wang, S.; Isaac, A.; Schlobach, S.; Meij, L. van der; Schopman, B.: Instance-based semantic interoperability in the cultural heritage (2012) 0.03 
    0.025030423 = product of:
  0.075091265 = sum of:
    0.075091265 = weight(_text_:sites in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075091265 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Beitrag eines Schwerpunktthemas: Semantic Web and Reasoning for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/instance-based-semantic-interoperability-cultural-heritage http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj157_1.pdf.
  5. Kollia, I.; Tzouvaras, V.; Drosopoulos, N.; Stamou, G.: ¬A systemic approach for effective semantic access to cultural content (2012) 0.03 
    0.025030423 = product of:
  0.075091265 = sum of:
    0.075091265 = weight(_text_:sites in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075091265 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Beitrag eines Schwerpunktthemas: Semantic Web and Reasoning for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/systemic-approach-eff%0Bective-semantic-access-cultural-content http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj147_3.pdf.
  6. Harken, S.E.: Subject semantic interoperability. Report of the Subcommittee on Semantic Interoperability to the ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee : Final report (2006) 0.03 
    0.025030423 = product of:
  0.075091265 = sum of:
    0.075091265 = weight(_text_:sites in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075091265 = score(doc=906,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites/ala.org.alcts/files/content/mgrps/camms/cmtes/sac/inact/semantic/sacsem_rpt.pdf
  7. Social tagging in a linked data environment. Edited by Diane Rasmussen Pennington and Louise F. Spiteri. London, UK: Facet Publishing, 2018. 240 pp. £74.95 (paperback). (ISBN 9781783303380) (2019) 0.03 
    0.025030423 = product of:
  0.075091265 = sum of:
    0.075091265 = weight(_text_:sites in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075091265 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.28878886 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Social tagging, hashtags, and geotags are used across a variety of platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, WordPress, Instagram) in different countries and cultures. This book, representing researchers and practitioners across different information professions, explores how social tags can link content across a variety of environments. Most studies of social tagging have tended to focus on applications like library catalogs, blogs, and social bookmarking sites. This book, in setting out a theoretical background and the use of a series of case studies, explores the role of hashtags as a form of linked data?without the complex implementation of RDF and other Semantic Web technologies.
  8. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.02 
    0.021944419 = product of:
  0.065833256 = sum of:
    0.065833256 = product of:
      0.19749975 = sum of:
        0.19749975 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19749975 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4216941 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  9. Takhirov, N.; Aalberg, T.; Duchateau, F.; Zumer, M.: FRBR-ML: a FRBR-based framework for semantic interoperability (2012) 0.02 
    0.020024337 = product of:
  0.06007301 = sum of:
    0.06007301 = weight(_text_:sites in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06007301 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.23103109 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Beitrag eines Schwerpunktthemas: Semantic Web and Reasoning for Cultural Heritage and Digital Libraries: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/frbr-ml-frbr-based-framework-semantic-interoperability-0 http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj161_3.pdf.
  10. DC-2013: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications : Online Proceedings (2013) 0.02 
    0.020024337 = product of:
  0.06007301 = sum of:
    0.06007301 = weight(_text_:sites in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06007301 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.23103109 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    FULL PAPERS Provenance and Annotations for Linked Data - Kai Eckert How Portable Are the Metadata Standards for Scientific Data? A Proposal for a Metadata Infrastructure - Jian Qin, Kai Li Lessons Learned in Implementing the Extended Date/Time Format in a Large Digital Library - Hannah Tarver, Mark Phillips Towards the Representation of Chinese Traditional Music: A State of the Art Review of Music Metadata Standards - Mi Tian, György Fazekas, Dawn Black, Mark Sandler Maps and Gaps: Strategies for Vocabulary Design and Development - Diane Ileana Hillmann, Gordon Dunsire, Jon Phipps A Method for the Development of Dublin Core Application Profiles (Me4DCAP V0.1): Aescription - Mariana Curado Malta, Ana Alice Baptista Find and Combine Vocabularies to Design Metadata Application Profiles using Schema Registries and LOD Resources - Tsunagu Honma, Mitsuharu Nagamori, Shigeo Sugimoto Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model - Antoine Isaac, Valentine Charles, Kate Fernie, Costis Dallas, Dimitris Gavrilis, Stavros Angelis With a Focused Intent: Evolution of DCMI as a Research Community - Jihee Beak, Richard P. Smiraglia Metadata Capital in a Data Repository - Jane Greenberg, Shea Swauger, Elena Feinstein DC Metadata is Alive and Well - A New Standard for Education - Liddy Nevile Representation of the UNIMARC Bibliographic Data Format in Resource Description Framework - Gordon Dunsire, Mirna Willer, Predrag Perozic
  11. Hubain, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hooland, S. van: Automated SKOS vocabulary design for the biopharmaceutical industry (2016) 0.02 
    0.017313559 = product of:
  0.051940672 = sum of:
    0.051940672 = product of:
      0.103881344 = sum of:
        0.103881344 = weight(_text_:index in 5132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103881344 = score(doc=5132,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 5132, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Ensuring quick and consistent access to large collections of unstructured documents is one of the biggest challenges facing knowledge-intensive organizations. Designing specific vocabularies to index and retrieve documents is often deemed too expensive, full-text search being preferred despite its known limitations. However, the process of creating controlled vocabularies can be partly automated thanks to natural language processing and machine learning techniques. With a case study from the biopharmaceutical industry, we demonstrate how small organizations can use an automated workflow in order to create a controlled vocabulary to index unstructured documents in a semantically meaningful way.
  12. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.02 
    0.015724447 = product of:
  0.04717334 = sum of:
    0.04717334 = product of:
      0.09434668 = sum of:
        0.09434668 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09434668 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  13. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.01 
    0.013478097 = product of:
  0.04043429 = sum of:
    0.04043429 = product of:
      0.08086858 = sum of:
        0.08086858 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08086858 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  14. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.01 
    0.013478097 = product of:
  0.04043429 = sum of:
    0.04043429 = product of:
      0.08086858 = sum of:
        0.08086858 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08086858 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
  15. Balakrishnan, U.; Krausz, A,; Voss, J.: Cocoda - ein Konkordanztool für bibliothekarische Klassifikationssysteme (2015) 0.01 
    0.012366828 = product of:
  0.037100483 = sum of:
    0.037100483 = product of:
      0.074200965 = sum of:
        0.074200965 = weight(_text_:index in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074200965 = score(doc=2030,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1676
  16. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.01 
    0.011231748 = product of:
  0.033695243 = sum of:
    0.033695243 = product of:
      0.06739049 = sum of:
        0.06739049 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06739049 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  17. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.01 
    0.011231748 = product of:
  0.033695243 = sum of:
    0.033695243 = product of:
      0.06739049 = sum of:
        0.06739049 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06739049 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  18. Vatant, B.; Dunsire, G.: Use case vocabulary merging (2010) 0.01 
    0.009893462 = product of:
  0.029680384 = sum of:
    0.029680384 = product of:
      0.05936077 = sum of:
        0.05936077 = weight(_text_:index in 4336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05936077 = score(doc=4336,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.27311024 = fieldWeight in 4336, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4336)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The publication of library legacy includes publication of structuring vocabularies such as thesauri, classifications, subject headings. Different sources use different vocabularies, different in structure, width, depth and scope, and languages. Federated access to distributed data collections is currently possible if they rely on the same vocabularies. Mapping techniques and standards supporting them (such as SKOS mapping properties, OWL sameAs and equivalentClass) are still largely experimental, even in the linked data land. Libraries use a variety of controlled subject vocabulary and classification schemes to index items in their collections. Although most collections will employ only a single scheme, different schemes may be chosen to index different collections within a library or in separate libraries; schemes are chosen on the basis of language, subject focus (general or specific), granularity (specificity), user expectation, and availability and support (cost, currency, completeness, tools). For example, a typical academic library will operate separate metadata systems for the library's main collections, special collections (e.g. manuscripts, archives, audiovisual), digital collections, and one or more institutional repositories for teaching and research output; each of these systems may employ a different subject vocabulary, with little or no interoperability between terms and concepts. Users expect to have a single point-of-search in resource discovery services focussed on their local institutional collections. Librarians have to use complex and expensive resource discovery platforms to meet user expectations. Library communities continue to develop resource discovery services for consortia with a geographical, subject, sector (public, academic, school, special libraries), and/or domain (libraries, archives, museums) focus. Services are based on distributed searching (e.g. via Z39.50) or metadata aggregations (e.g. OCLC's WorldCat and OAISter). As a result, the number of different subject schemes encountered in such services is increasing. Trans-national consortia (e.g. Europeana) add to the complexity of the environment by including subject vocabularies in multiple languages. Users expect single point-of-search in consortial resource discovery service involving multiple organisations and large-scale metadata aggregations. Users also expect to be able to search for subjects using their own language and terms in an unambiguous, contextualised manner.
  19. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01 
    0.009530455 = product of:
  0.028591363 = sum of:
    0.028591363 = product of:
      0.057182726 = sum of:
        0.057182726 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057182726 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  20. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01 
    0.009530455 = product of:
  0.028591363 = sum of:
    0.028591363 = product of:
      0.057182726 = sum of:
        0.057182726 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057182726 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 42
  • d 12

Types

  • a 33
  • el 20
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications