Search (1934 results, page 1 of 97)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mundle, K.; Huie, H.; Bangalore, N.S.: ARL Library Catalog Department Web sites : an evaluative study (2006) 0.20 
    0.19903561 = product of:
  0.2985534 = sum of:
    0.21239017 = weight(_text_:sites in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21239017 = score(doc=771,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.81681824 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
    0.086163245 = sum of:
      0.052468 = weight(_text_:index in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052468 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049739745 = queryNorm
          0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
      0.033695243 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033695243 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049739745 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    User-friendly and content-rich Web sites are indispensable for any knowledge-based organization. Web site evaluation studies point to ways to improve the efficiency and usability of Web sites. Library catalog or technical services department Web sites have proliferated in the past few years, but there is no systematic and accepted method that evaluates the performance of these Web sites. An earlier study by Mundle, Zhao, and Bangalore evaluated catalog department Web sites within the consortium of the Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) libraries, proposed a model to assess these Web sites, and recommended desirable features for them. The present study was undertaken to test the model further and to assess the recommended features. The study evaluated the catalog department Web sites of Association of Research Libraries members. It validated the model proposed, and confirmed the use of the performance index (PI) as an objective measure to assess the usability or workability of a catalog department Web site. The model advocates using a PI of 1.5 as the benchmark for catalog department Web site evaluation by employing the study tool and scoring method suggested in this paper.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Shen, X.; Li, D.; Shen, C.: Evaluating China's university library Web sites using correspondence analysis (2006) 0.20 
    0.19707392 = product of:
  0.29561087 = sum of:
    0.26865467 = weight(_text_:sites in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26865467 = score(doc=5277,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        1.0332024 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
    0.026956195 = product of:
      0.05391239 = sum of:
        0.05391239 = weight(_text_:22 in 5277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05391239 = score(doc=5277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5277)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    In recent years, many evaluations of Web sites have been conducted, and relevant researches have also been carried out in academic circles. Correspondence analysis is introduced in this paper to evaluate university library Web sites through building a correspondence analysis model. This paper gives suggestions as to how to construct university library Web sites based on analysis and summary of evaluation results, in a bid to strengthen the construction of university library Web sites.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:40:18
  3. Rosenfeld, L.; Morville, P.: Information architecture for the World Wide Web : designing large-scale Web sites (2007) 0.13 
    0.13385527 = product of:
  0.2007829 = sum of:
    0.18393527 = weight(_text_:sites in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18393527 = score(doc=5135,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.7073853 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
    0.016847622 = product of:
      0.033695243 = sum of:
        0.033695243 = weight(_text_:22 in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033695243 = score(doc=5135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The scale of web site design has grown so that what was once comparable to decorating a room is now comparable to designing buildings or even cities. Designing sites so that people can find their way around is an ever-growing challenge as sites contain more and more information. In the past, Information Architecture for the World Wide Web has helped developers and designers establish consistent and usable structures for their sites and their information. This edition of the classic primer on web site design and navigation is updated with recent examples, new scenarios, and new information on best practices. Readers will learn how to present large volumes of information to visitors who need to find what they're looking for quickly. With topics that range from aesthetics to mechanics, this valuable book explains how to create interfaces that users can understand easily.
    Date
    22. 3.2008 16:18:27
    LCSH
    Web sites / Design
    Subject
    Web sites / Design
  4. Herrera-Viedma, E.; Pasi, G.; Lopez-Herrera, A.G.; Porcel; C.: Evaluating the information quality of Web sites : a methodology based on fuzzy computing with words (2006) 0.13 
    0.13385527 = product of:
  0.2007829 = sum of:
    0.18393527 = weight(_text_:sites in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18393527 = score(doc=5286,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.7073853 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
    0.016847622 = product of:
      0.033695243 = sum of:
        0.033695243 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033695243 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    An evaluation methodology based on fuzzy computing with words aimed at measuring the information quality of Web sites containing documents is presented. This methodology is qualitative and user oriented because it generates linguistic recommendations on the information quality of the content-based Web sites based on users' perceptions. It is composed of two main components, an evaluation scheme to analyze the information quality of Web sites and a measurement method to generate the linguistic recommendations. The evaluation scheme is based on both technical criteria related to the Web site structure and criteria related to the content of information on the Web sites. It is user driven because the chosen criteria are easily understandable by the users, in such a way that Web visitors can assess them by means of linguistic evaluation judgments. The measurement method is user centered because it generates linguistic recommendations of the Web sites based on the visitors' linguistic evaluation judgments. To combine the linguistic evaluation judgments we introduce two new majority guided linguistic aggregation operators, the Majority guided Linguistic Induced Ordered Weighted Averaging (MLIOWA) and weighted MLIOWA operators, which generate the linguistic recommendations according to the majority of the evaluation judgments provided by different visitors. The use of this methodology could improve tasks such as information filtering and evaluation on the World Wide Web.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:05:46
  5. Hert, C.A.; Jacob, E.K.; Dawson, P.: ¬A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment (2000) 0.13 
    0.12581527 = product of:
  0.1887229 = sum of:
    0.13006188 = weight(_text_:sites in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13006188 = score(doc=5158,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.500197 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
    0.05866101 = product of:
      0.11732202 = sum of:
        0.11732202 = weight(_text_:index in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11732202 = score(doc=5158,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.5397815 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Usability of Web sites has become an increasingly important area of research as Web sites proliferate and problems with use are noted. Generally, aspects of Web sites that have been investigated focus on such areas as overall design and navigation. The exploratory study reported on here investigates one specific component of a Web site-the index structure. By employing index usability metrics developed by Liddy and Jörgensen (1993; Jörgensen & Liddy, 1996) and modified to accommodate a hypertext environment, the study compared the effectiveness and efficiency of 20 subjects who used one existing index (the A-Z index on the FedStats Web site at http://www.fedstats.gov) and three experimental variants to complete five researcher-generated tasks. User satisfaction with the indexes was also evaluated. The findings indicate that a hypertext index with multiple access points for each concept, all linked to the same resource, led to greater effectiveness and efficiency of retrieval on almost all measures. Satisfaction measures were more variable. The study offers insight into potential improvements in the design of Web-based indexes and provides preliminary assessment of the validity of the measures employed
  6. Lavoie, B.F.; O'Neill, E.T.: How "World Wide" Is the Web? : Trends in the Internationalization of Web Sites (2001) 0.12 
    0.12258518 = product of:
  0.18387777 = sum of:
    0.15018253 = weight(_text_:sites in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15018253 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.5775777 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
    0.033695243 = product of:
      0.06739049 = sum of:
        0.06739049 = weight(_text_:22 in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06739049 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    7.10.2002 9:22:14
  7. Hedden, H.: Creating an index for your Web site to make info easier to see (2006) 0.12 
    0.119671196 = product of:
  0.1795068 = sum of:
    0.12014602 = weight(_text_:sites in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12014602 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.46206218 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
    0.05936077 = product of:
      0.11872154 = sum of:
        0.11872154 = weight(_text_:index in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11872154 = score(doc=2189,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Most libraries have long had their own Web sites. The longer a library has had a Web site the more likely it is that the number of pages, and the amount of information within those pages, has grown beyond what users can find simply with the navigation menu. Building a site index is a great way to help seekers find all those bits of data they might otherwise miss.
  8. Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006) 0.11 
    0.11483987 = product of:
  0.1722598 = sum of:
    0.14867312 = weight(_text_:sites in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14867312 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.57177275 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
    0.02358667 = product of:
      0.04717334 = sum of:
        0.04717334 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04717334 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. LaBarre, K.: Discovery and access systems for Websites and cultural heritage sites reconsidering the practical application of facets (2008) 0.11 
    0.11483987 = product of:
  0.1722598 = sum of:
    0.14867312 = weight(_text_:sites in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14867312 = score(doc=2247,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.57177275 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
    0.02358667 = product of:
      0.04717334 = sum of:
        0.04717334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04717334 = score(doc=2247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Facets are an increasingly common feature of contemporary access and discovery systems. These intuitively adaptable structures seem well suited for application in information architecture and the practice of knowledge management (La Barre, 2006). As browsing and searching devices, facets function equally well on e-commerce sites, digital museum portals, and online library catalogs. This paper argues that clearly articulated principles for facets and facet analysis must draw examples from current practice while building upon heritage principles m order to scaffold the development of robust and fully faceted information infrastructures.
    Date
    27.12.2008 9:50:22
  10. Huang, C.-Y.; Chang, S.-S.: Commonality of Web site visiting among countries (2009) 0.10 
    0.104197256 = product of:
  0.15629588 = sum of:
    0.13006188 = weight(_text_:sites in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13006188 = score(doc=2851,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.500197 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
    0.026234 = product of:
      0.052468 = sum of:
        0.052468 = weight(_text_:index in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052468 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Although the role the Internet plays in globalization has been widely discussed, relatively little is known about the extent to which users in different countries visit the same Web sites. Surprisingly, no prior research in the literature has empirically addressed this topic in a systematic way. Based on the theory of life in the round and related concepts of information behavior, this article reports an attempt to fill the gap by looking at how cultural, geodemographical, and economic factors underpin the extent which people from different countries visit the same Web sites. A commonality index to measure the commonality of Web site visiting for the macrolevel, cross-country study is proposed for a large-scale empirical study using online panel data that cover 101 countries. Results from the analyses indicate that as cyberspace is obviously fractured, Internet users in countries that share a common language, religion, and social norms, that have a similar level of economic development, and that are physically nearer to one another are more likely to visit the same Web sites. The relationship between individual-level information behavior and macrolevel Internet traffic metrics is established; the former helps explain the latter whereas the latter enriches the former.
  11. Harms, I.; Schweibenz, W.: Usability engineering methods for the Web (2000) 0.10 
    0.10204741 = product of:
  0.15307112 = sum of:
    0.09010952 = weight(_text_:sites in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09010952 = score(doc=5482,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.34654665 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
    0.0629616 = product of:
      0.1259232 = sum of:
        0.1259232 = weight(_text_:index in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1259232 = score(doc=5482,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The paper presents the results of a study on usability methods for evaluating Web sites. It summarizes the "Heuristics for Web Communications," and reports the practical experiences with these heuristics, contrasting them with the "Keevil Index" and combining them with user testing with thinking aloud. It concludes that working with the "Heuristics for Web Communications" takes more time and effort than working with the "Keevil Index," but produces more consistent results. The heuristics proved to be applicable both in heuristic evaluation and in combination with user testing.
    Content
    Der Beitrag präsentiert eine Studie über Evaluationsmethoden zur WebUsability. Er beschreibt die "Heuristics for Web Communications" und berichtet von den praktischen Erfahrungen mit den Heuristiken, die mit dem "Keevil Index" verglichen und mit Benutzertests mit lautem Denken kombiniert werden. Das Ergebnis zeigt, dass eine Evaluation mit den beschriebenen Heuristiken gegenüber dem "Keevil Index" mehr Zeit und Aufwand erfordert, aber konsistentere Ergebnisse bringt. Die Heuristiken haben sich sowohl in der experten-zentrierten Evaluation als auch in Kombination mit dem Benutzertest insgesamt als geeignete Evaluationsmethode erwiesen
  12. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.10 
    0.09843417 = product of:
  0.14765126 = sum of:
    0.1274341 = weight(_text_:sites in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1274341 = score(doc=2109,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.49009097 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
    0.020217145 = product of:
      0.04043429 = sum of:
        0.04043429 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04043429 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Many Web sites have begun allowing users to submit items to a collection and tag them with keywords. The folksonomies built from these tags are an interesting topic that has seen little empirical research. This study compared the search information retrieval (IR) performance of folksonomies from social bookmarking Web sites against search engines and subject directories. Thirty-four participants created 103 queries for various information needs. Results from each IR system were collected and participants judged relevance. Folksonomy search results overlapped with those from the other systems, and documents found by both search engines and folksonomies were significantly more likely to be judged relevant than those returned by any single IR system type. The search engines in the study had the highest precision and recall, but the folksonomies fared surprisingly well. Del.icio.us was statistically indistinguishable from the directories in many cases. Overall the directories were more precise than the folksonomies but they had similar recall scores. Better query handling may enhance folksonomy IR performance further. The folksonomies studied were promising, and may be able to improve Web search performance.
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  13. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.10 
    0.09806815 = product of:
  0.14710222 = sum of:
    0.12014602 = weight(_text_:sites in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12014602 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.46206218 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
    0.026956195 = product of:
      0.05391239 = sum of:
        0.05391239 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05391239 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  14. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.10 
    0.09806815 = product of:
  0.14710222 = sum of:
    0.12014602 = weight(_text_:sites in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12014602 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.46206218 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
    0.026956195 = product of:
      0.05391239 = sum of:
        0.05391239 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05391239 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  15. Hedden, H.: Indexing specialities : Web Sites (2007) 0.10 
    0.09529098 = product of:
  0.14293647 = sum of:
    0.078037135 = weight(_text_:sites in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078037135 = score(doc=1146,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.3001182 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
    0.06489933 = product of:
      0.12979867 = sum of:
        0.12979867 = weight(_text_:index in 1146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12979867 = score(doc=1146,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.5971847 = fieldWeight in 1146, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1146)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IWP 60(2009) H.4, S.245 (J. Fassbender): "Heather Heddens Buch über Website-Indexing gehört zur Indexing Specialties-Serie, die vom Information Today-Verlag in Zusammenarbeit mit der American Society of Indexers herausgegeben wird. Der Bereich Website-Indexing befasst sich mit der Index-Erstellung und -Pflege für Websites und Intranets - ähnlich zu Registern für Printpublikationen. Ein Website-Index hat oft die Bezeichnung Site Index oder A-Z Index und sollte zudem nicht mit Site Maps verwechselt werden. Das Buch füllt gerade auch hierzulande eine Riesenlücke aus: Nach Einschätzung des Deutschen Netzwerks der Indexer (DNI) ist das Wissensdefizit über Website-Indexing in der deutschen Web- und IT-Szene enorm. Die Autorin beginnt in diesem Sinne auch gleich mit zwei Kernaussagen des Buches: 1. Website-Indexing sei deshalb in der Web-Szene nicht so verbreitet, weil die Kenntnisse der Methoden zur Index-Erstellung fehlen und/oder die nötigen Tools unbekannt sind. 2. Ein guter Index stelle für viele Sites die effektivste Suchmethode dar - trotz der Konkurrenz zu Navigationsmenüs und Sucheingabe. Verdeutlicht werden sodann die Unterschiede zu Print-Registern, der bedeutendste betrifft die Locators (Fundstellen), die in der Regel keine Seitenangaben, sondern Links sind.
    Ein Kapitel über HTML-Grundlagen ist für diejenigen Indexer gedacht, die sich in diesem Bereich bisher nicht oder wenig auskennen. Ein weiteres Kapitel verdeutlicht die HTML-Tags, die speziell für die Website-Index-Erstellung von Bedeutung sind. Die Erläuterungen zu Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) ist ausreichend, aber etwas knapp; hier wären einige CSS-Techniken für Fortgeschrittene von Interesse gewesen. Auf die Möglichkeiten von Konvertierungs-Tools (wie HTML/Prep), mit denen Dokumente ins HTML-Format umgewandelt werden können, sowie von Online Help Authoring Tools wird ebenfalls eingegangen. Sie bilden eine gute Ergänzung zu den indexspezifischen HTML-Erläuterungen. Das Thema XML ist bewusst ausgeschlossen worden, um sich vom Fokus des Buches nicht zu weit zu entfernen. Dennoch hätte man sich als Leser zumindest ein paar grundsätzliche Erläuterungen im Kontext zum Website-Indexing gewünscht. Ein Kapitel über Dedicated-IndexingSoftware behandelt deren Möglichkeiten einer Index-Erstellung für Websites. Die Autorin argumentiert überzeugend, dass die großen Vorteile dieser von Indexern weltweit am meisten eingesetzten Software deren mächtige Möglichkeiten zur Erstellung, Bearbeitung, Veränderung und Kontrolle von Index-Einträgen sind, was einer hohen Index-Qualität zugute kommt. Die HTML-Ausgabe-Optionen dieser Software-Art sind allerdings etwas eingeschränkter, so dass der Output oft einer Nachbearbeitung bedarf. Es folgen zwei Kapitel über spezielle Website-Indexing-Software. XRefHT (gesprochen: Shreft) ist eine Freeware, die von Prof. Timothy Craven (University of Western Ontario) entwickelt wurde. HTML Indexer ist eine kommerziell erhältliche Software. Detailliert erläutert werden, welche Elemente von Web-Seiten von den beiden Programmen für Index-Einträge berücksichtigt werden, wie Index-Einträge und Querverweise erstellt und bearbeitet und wie die Register aktualisiert werden können.
    Zwei Kapitel behandeln die Vorgehensweise bei der Index-Erstellung sowie die vielfältigen Aspekte der Index-Gestaltung. Anhand vieler Beispiele werden die Besonderheiten, aber auch Parallelen zu Printregistern beleuchtet, z. B. bestehende und neu einzufügende Anker, Berücksichtigung verschiedener Seiten-Arten und -Formate, Umgang mit mehreren Locatorn pro Eintrag, Navigation innerhalb des Site Indexes. Das Schlusskapitel widmet sich den Business-Aspekten des Website-Indexing, auch aus Freelancer-Sicht. Erläutert werden z. B., welche Arten von Websites in Frage kommen und wie die Fortführung der Indexierung berücksichtigt wird. Der Index des Buches ist insgesamt von guter Qualität, wie man es von den Indexing-Büchern des Information Today-Verlages gewöhnt ist - ja sogar von exzellenter Qualität im Vergleich zu vielen unzureichenden Registern deutschsprachiger Fachbücher. Mit fünf Prozent Umfang im Verhältnis zur Anzahl der inhaltlichen Seiten hat der Index eine gute Standardlänge. Wesentliche Indexierungstechniken, wie Untereinträge, siehe- und siehe auch-Querverweise, vollständige Seitenbereichsangaben (d. h. ohne die wenig hilfreichen ff.-Angaben) kommen zum Einsatz. Einige Untereinträge tauchen allerdings nicht auch als Haupteintrag auf; so findet man z. B. "indexing rates" nur als Untereintrag des Haupteintrages "Business and index market". Die typographische und satztechnische Qualität des Registers ist ebenfalls gut, z. B. unterschiedliche Einrückungen von Untereinträgen und deren Zeilenumbrüchen. Insgesamt gesehen ist Indexing Specialties: Web Sites ein sehr empfehlenswertes Buch, das ein wichtiges (und bisher vernachlässigtes) Thema abdeckt."
  16. Park, H.W.; Barnett, G.A.; Nam, I.-Y.: Hyperlink - affiliation network structure of top Web sites : examining affiliates with hyperlink in Korea (2002) 0.09 
    0.09271398 = product of:
  0.27814195 = sum of:
    0.27814195 = weight(_text_:sites in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27814195 = score(doc=584,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        1.0696889 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This article argues that individual Web sites form hyperlink-affiliations with others for the purpose of strengthening their individual trust, expertness, and safety. It describes the hyperlink-affiliation network structure of Korea's top 152 Web sites. The data were obtained from their Web sites for October 2000. The results indicate that financial Web sites, such as credit card and stock Web sites, occupy the most central position in the network. A cluster analysis reveals that the structure of the hyperlink-affiliation network is influenced by the financial Web sites with which others are affiliated. These findings are discussed from the perspective of Web site credibility.
  17. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.09 
    0.091907464 = product of:
  0.27572238 = sum of:
    0.27572238 = sum of:
      0.1678976 = weight(_text_:index in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1678976 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049739745 = queryNorm
          0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.10782478 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10782478 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049739745 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  18. Piggott, M.: How the Index Society began - and ended (2000) 0.09 
    0.091907464 = product of:
  0.27572238 = sum of:
    0.27572238 = sum of:
      0.1678976 = weight(_text_:index in 505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1678976 = score(doc=505,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049739745 = queryNorm
          0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 505, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=505)
      0.10782478 = weight(_text_:22 in 505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10782478 = score(doc=505,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049739745 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 505, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=505)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.33-35
  19. Aguillo, I.F.; Granadino, B.; Ortega, J.L.; Prieto, J.A.: Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators (2006) 0.09 
    0.089753404 = product of:
  0.1346301 = sum of:
    0.09010952 = weight(_text_:sites in 5898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09010952 = score(doc=5898,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.34654665 = fieldWeight in 5898, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5898)
    0.044520576 = product of:
      0.08904115 = sum of:
        0.08904115 = weight(_text_:index in 5898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08904115 = score(doc=5898,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21735094 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 5898, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5898)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    To test feasibility of cybermetric indicators for describing and ranking university activities as shown in their Web sites, a large set of 9,330 institutions worldwide was compiled and analyzed. Using search engines' advanced features, size (number of pages), visibility (number of external inlinks), and number of rich files (pdf, ps, doc, ppt, and As formats) were obtained for each of the institutional domains of the universities. We found a statistically significant correlation between a Web ranking built on a combination of Webometric data and other university rankings based on bibliometric and other indicators. Results show that cybermetric measures could be useful for reflecting the contribution of technologically oriented institutions, increasing the visibility of developing countries, and improving the rankings based on Science Citation Index (SCI) data with known biases.
    Object
    Science Citation Index
  20. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.09 
    0.08580963 = product of:
  0.12871444 = sum of:
    0.105127774 = weight(_text_:sites in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105127774 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26002133 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049739745 = queryNorm
        0.40430441 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.227637 = idf(docFreq=644, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
    0.02358667 = product of:
      0.04717334 = sum of:
        0.04717334 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04717334 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1741801 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049739745 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    We have created software applications that allow users to both author and use Semantic Web metadata. To create and use a layer of semantic content on top of the existing Web, we have (1) implemented a user interface that expedites the task of attributing metadata to resources on the Web, and (2) augmented a Web browser to leverage this semantic metadata to provide relevant information and tasks to the user. This project provides a framework for annotating and reorganizing existing files, pages, and sites on the Web that is similar to Vannevar Bushrsquos original concepts of trail blazing and associative indexing.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1599
  • m 235
  • el 103
  • s 74
  • b 27
  • x 19
  • i 17
  • r 4
  • n 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications