Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.03378243 = product of:
  0.06756486 = sum of:
    0.06756486 = product of:
      0.13512972 = sum of:
        0.13512972 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13512972 = score(doc=3822,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.270842 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05089233 = queryNorm
            0.49892458 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Informetrics is a subfield of information science and it encompasses bibliometrics, scientometrics, cybermetrics, and webometrics. This encyclopedia entry provides an overview of informetrics and its subfields. In general, informetrics deals with quantitative aspects of information: its production, dissemination, evaluation, and use. Bibliometrics and scientometrics study scientific literature: papers, journals, patents, and citations; while in webometric studies the sources studied are Web pages and Web sites, and citations are replaced by hypertext links. The entry introduces major topics in informetrics: citation analysis and citation related studies, the journal impact factor, the recently defined h-index, citation databases, co-citation analysis, open access publications and its implications, informetric laws, techniques for mapping and visualization of informetric phenomena, the emerging subfields of webometrics, cybermetrics and link analysis, and research evaluation.

Source

Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates

0.01990649 = product of:
  0.03981298 = sum of:
    0.03981298 = product of:
      0.07962596 = sum of:
        0.07962596 = weight(_text_:encyclopedia in 6104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07962596 = score(doc=6104,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.270842 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05089233 = queryNorm
            0.29399413 = fieldWeight in 6104, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.321862 = idf(docFreq=586, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6104)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The World Wide Web has become one of our more important information sources, and commercial search engines are the major tools for locating information; however, it is not enough for a Web page to be indexed by the search engines-it also must rank high on relevant queries. One of the parameters involved in ranking is the number and quality of links pointing to the page, based on the assumption that links convey appreciation for a page. This article presents the results of a content analysis of the links to two top pages retrieved by Google for the query "jew" as of July 2004: the "jew" entry on the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia, and the home page of "Jew Watch," a highly anti-Semitic site. The top results for the query "jew" gained public attention in April 2004, when it was noticed that the "Jew Watch" homepage ranked number 1. From this point on, both sides engaged in "Googlebombing" (i.e., increasing the number of links pointing to these pages). The results of the study show that most of the links to these pages come from blogs and discussion links, and the number of links pointing to these pages in appreciation of their content is extremely small. These findings have implications for ranking algorithms based on link counts, and emphasize the huge difference between Web links and citations in the scientific community.

0.00861901 = product of:
  0.01723802 = sum of:
    0.01723802 = product of:
      0.03447604 = sum of:
        0.03447604 = weight(_text_:22 in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03447604 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17821628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05089233 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.0068952087 = product of:
  0.013790417 = sum of:
    0.013790417 = product of:
      0.027580835 = sum of:
        0.027580835 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027580835 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17821628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05089233 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.0068952087 = product of:
  0.013790417 = sum of:
    0.013790417 = product of:
      0.027580835 = sum of:
        0.027580835 = weight(_text_:22 in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027580835 = score(doc=3071,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17821628 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05089233 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22