Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bawden, D."
  1. Brophy, J.; Bawden, D.: Is Google enough? : Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources (2005) 0.03
    0.03089039 = product of:
      0.06178078 = sum of:
        0.005885557 = product of:
          0.023542227 = sum of:
            0.023542227 = weight(_text_:based in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023542227 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.16644597 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.055895224 = product of:
          0.11179045 = sum of:
            0.11179045 = weight(_text_:assessment in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11179045 = score(doc=648,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.43132967 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the study was to compare an internet search engine, Google, with appropriate library databases and systems, in order to assess the relative value, strengths and weaknesses of the two sorts of system. Design/methodology/approach - A case study approach was used, with detailed analysis and failure checking of results. The performance of the two systems was assessed in terms of coverage, unique records, precision, and quality and accessibility of results. A novel form of relevance assessment, based on the work of Saracevic and others was devised. Findings - Google is superior for coverage and accessibility. Library systems are superior for quality of results. Precision is similar for both systems. Good coverage requires use of both, as both have many unique items. Improving the skills of the searcher is likely to give better results from the library systems, but not from Google. Research limitations/implications - Only four case studies were included. These were limited to the kind of queries likely to be searched by university students. Library resources were limited to those in two UK academic libraries. Only the basic Google web search functionality was used, and only the top ten records examined. Practical implications - The results offer guidance for those providing support and training for use of these retrieval systems, and also provide evidence for debates on the "Google phenomenon". Originality/value - This is one of the few studies which provide evidence on the relative performance of internet search engines and library databases, and the only one to conduct such in-depth case studies. The method for the assessment of relevance is novel.
  2. Rowlands, I.; Bawden, D.: Building the digital library on solid research foundations (1999) 0.02
    0.015250247 = product of:
      0.030500494 = sum of:
        0.00823978 = product of:
          0.03295912 = sum of:
            0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03295912 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.022260714 = product of:
          0.04452143 = sum of:
            0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04452143 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library is a socio-technical concept of great significance. It redefines the relationships between information providers and intermediaries and, potentially, transforms the way that services are delivered to users. This article, based on a British Library Research & Innovation Centre funded study, reviews current themes and directions in digital library research and scholarship. It locates the digital library in a simple work-oriented framework emphasising its social as well as its systems and informational dimensions. The article highlights differences in understanding of the digital library construct between the library and computer science communities and identifies some critical areas for further research.
    Date
    21. 1.2007 12:03:22
  3. Bawden, D.: Encountering on the road to serendip? : Browsing in new information environments (2011) 0.02
    0.015250247 = product of:
      0.030500494 = sum of:
        0.00823978 = product of:
          0.03295912 = sum of:
            0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03295912 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.022260714 = product of:
          0.04452143 = sum of:
            0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04452143 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter considers the continuing relevance of the ideas of browsing, serendipity, information encountering and literature discovery in the context of the information retrieval (IR) environment of 2010, though its scope extends to the ideas in the broader contexts of information seeking and information-related behaviour. It is based around a selective review of the literature since 1990 and reflection and speculation on the results. The central focus is on questions of how the concept of browsing, serendipity and related ideas have changed in the new IR environment of the web and whether, indeed, they are still meaningfull concepts.
    Pages
    S.1-22
  4. Bawden, D.: ¬The shifting terminology's of information (2001) 0.01
    0.014115169 = product of:
      0.056460675 = sum of:
        0.056460675 = weight(_text_:term in 706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056460675 = score(doc=706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.25776416 = fieldWeight in 706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=706)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    At the heart of any discussion of the information sciences, at least when this discussion is held in the English language, lies the problem of the variant, and shifting, set of concepts and meanings of the terms 'library' and 'information'. The term 'information', in particular, has a variety of meanings in different contexts and communities of discourse, providing an excellent example of Wittgenstein's language game. This implies that any terminology built around this central concept is in danger of being constructed on 'shifting sands'. This article outlines, for the English language only, some of these diverse meanings of information, and their consequences for the terminology of the information sciences. It focuses on the variant relationships between information and related concepts, particularly data and knowledge. It also includes an account of the view information taken in the hard and soft methodologies of system science, as well as the new discipline of 'information physics'. From this, some remarks may be made on the changing meanings of the complex terms such as 'information technology' and 'information literacy', as well as those complex terms involving 'management', information management, knowledge management, document management etc. A similar, though shorter, treatment will de given to terminology around the 'library' concept, particularly in view of the change toward viewing a library as an organised virtual information space, rather than physical environment.
  5. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.01
    0.011130357 = product of:
      0.04452143 = sum of:
        0.04452143 = product of:
          0.08904286 = sum of:
            0.08904286 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08904286 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
  6. Bawden, D.: Information policy or knowledge policy? (1997) 0.01
    0.0055651786 = product of:
      0.022260714 = sum of:
        0.022260714 = product of:
          0.04452143 = sum of:
            0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04452143 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Understanding information policy. Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996. Ed. by Ian Rowlands
  7. Bawden, D.: Information and digital literacies : a review of concepts (2001) 0.00
    0.0035679291 = product of:
      0.014271717 = sum of:
        0.014271717 = product of:
          0.057086866 = sum of:
            0.057086866 = weight(_text_:based in 4479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057086866 = score(doc=4479,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.40361002 = fieldWeight in 4479, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4479)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The concepts of 'information literacy' and 'digital literacy' are described, and reviewed, by way of a literature survey and analysis. Related concepts, including computer literacy, library literacy, network literacy, Internet literacy and hyper-literacy are also discussed, and their relationships elucidated. After a general introduction, the paper begins with the basic concept of 'literacy', which is then expanded to include newer forms of literacy, more suitable for complex information environments. Some of these, for example library, media and computer literacies, are based largely on specific skills, but have some extension beyond them. They lead togeneral concepts, such as information literacy and digital literacy which are based on knowledge, perceptions and attitudes, though reliant on the simpler skills-based literacies
  8. Bawden, D.: Organised complexity, meaning and understanding : an approach to a unified view of information for information science (2007) 0.00
    0.002548521 = product of:
      0.010194084 = sum of:
        0.010194084 = product of:
          0.040776335 = sum of:
            0.040776335 = weight(_text_:based in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040776335 = score(doc=816,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.28829288 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper seeks to outline an approach to a unified framework for understanding the concept of "information" in the physical, biological and human domains, and to see what links and interactions may be found between them. It also aims to re-examine the information science discipline, with a view to locating it in a larger context, so as to reflect on the possibility that information science may not only draw from these other disciplines, but that its insights may contribute to them. Design/methodology/approach - The paper takes the form of an extensive literature review and analysis, loosely based on the approaches of Stonier, Madden and Bates, and including analysis of both scientific and library/information literature. Findings - The paper identifies the concept of information as being identified with organised complexity in the physical domain, with meaning in context in the biological domain, and with Kvanvig's concept of understanding in the human domain. The linking thread is laws of emergent self-organised complexity, applicable in all domains. Argues that a unified perspective for the information sciences, based on Popperian ontology, may be derived, with the possibility of not merely drawing insights from physical and biological science, but also of contributing to them. Based on Hirst's educational philosophy, derives a definition for the information sciences around two poles: information science and library/information management.
  9. Bawden, D.: Users, user studies and human information behaviour : a three-decade perspective on Tom Wilson's "On user studies and information needs" (2006) 0.00
    0.0024970302 = product of:
      0.009988121 = sum of:
        0.009988121 = product of:
          0.039952483 = sum of:
            0.039952483 = weight(_text_:based in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039952483 = score(doc=737,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.28246817 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review Wilson's (1981) seminal article, "On user studies and information needs" (Journal of Documentation, 1981, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 3-15) as part of a series celebrating the Journal's 60th anniversary. Design/methodology/approach - This paper adopts a literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Wilson's paper as the starting point, and evaluating the significance of, and later developments in, the issues dealt with in that article. Findings - Wilson's article has had a significant effect on the development of information science. It dealt with several fundamental issues, including the nature of information itself and of information need, models of information seeking and information behaviour, particularly those based on phenomenological or "whole life" concepts, appropriate research methods for these areas, and the nature of information science as an academic discipline. Originality/value - The paper provides a perspective on the development of information science over 30 years, with particular emphasis on the study of human information behaviour.
  10. Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Distance learning and LIS professional development (2002) 0.00
    0.0023542228 = product of:
      0.009416891 = sum of:
        0.009416891 = product of:
          0.037667565 = sum of:
            0.037667565 = weight(_text_:based in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037667565 = score(doc=691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Computer Based Training
  11. Hall, J.L.; Bawden, D.: Online retrieval history : how it all began (2011) 0.00
    0.0023542228 = product of:
      0.009416891 = sum of:
        0.009416891 = product of:
          0.037667565 = sum of:
            0.037667565 = weight(_text_:based in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037667565 = score(doc=4539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.26631355 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to discuss the history of online searching through the views of one of its pioneers. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents, and comments on, the recollections of Jim Hall, one of the earliest UK-based operators of, and writers on, online retrieval systems. Findings - The paper gives an account of the development of online searching in the UK during the 1960s and 1970s. Originality/value - The paper presents the perspective of one of the pioneers of online searching.
  12. Mason, T.; Bawden, D.: Times new plural : the multiple temporalities of contemporary life and the infosphere (2023) 0.00
    0.002059945 = product of:
      0.00823978 = sum of:
        0.00823978 = product of:
          0.03295912 = sum of:
            0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03295912 = score(doc=1052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Experiences of time and temporalities in contemporary life are analysed, with Floridi's conception of the infosphere as a central concept. The effects of instantaneous communication and digital information are shown to result not simply in the obvious acceleration of many aspects of life, but in multiple temporalities. The informational spaces of Floridi's hyperhistorical time form a new time-based society, with our informational activities expressed in linear, cyclic, re-cyclic, and iterative processes. Examples from the information sciences, particularly information seeking and "slow information," are given, and an outline model for time literacy is presented.
  13. Bawden, D.: Browsing : theory and practice (1993) 0.00
    0.0017656671 = product of:
      0.0070626684 = sum of:
        0.0070626684 = product of:
          0.028250674 = sum of:
            0.028250674 = weight(_text_:based in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028250674 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a selective literature review covering the process of browsing as a means of searching for information. References are selected in order to illustrate the major themes and to bring out points which have not been emphasised before. The main points covered in the review include: consideration of browsing as an important, but under rated and little understood, form of information access; the ability in browsing to find analogies, connections, and new lines of thought; the potential of browsings as an ideal technique for accasional or non expert users; the ability to apply browsing to both paper based and computerized information retrieval; and the ability to search for information in a semi-random fashion leading to serendipitous linkage. Concludes that, despite the acknowledges importance of browsing, the increased effort being expended in making computerized systems browsable and the many references to the concept in the computer literature, there is still a lack of real understanding of the basic concepts of the process
  14. Bawden, D.: Information as self-organized complexity : a unifying viewpoint (2007) 0.00
    0.0017656671 = product of:
      0.0070626684 = sum of:
        0.0070626684 = product of:
          0.028250674 = sum of:
            0.028250674 = weight(_text_:based in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028250674 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Introduction. This short paper proposes that a unified concept of information as a form of self-organized complexity may be equally applicable to the physical, biological and human/social domains. This is seen as the evolutionary emergence of organized complexity in the physical universe, meaning in context in the biological domain, and understanding through knowledge in the human domain. Method.This study is based on analysis of literature from a wide range of disciplines. Conclusions.This perspective allows for the possibility that not only may the library/information sciences be able to draw insights from the natural sciences, but that library and information science research and scholarship may in turn contribute insights to these disciplines, normally thought of as more 'fundamental'.
  15. Haider, J.; Bawden, D.: Conceptions of "information poverty" in LIS : a discourse analysis (2007) 0.00
    0.0014713892 = product of:
      0.005885557 = sum of:
        0.005885557 = product of:
          0.023542227 = sum of:
            0.023542227 = weight(_text_:based in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023542227 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04694356 = queryNorm
                0.16644597 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To provide an analysis of the notion of "information poverty" in library and information science (LIS) by investigating concepts, interests and strategies leading to its construction and thus to examine its role as a constitutive element of the professional discourse. Design/methodology/approach - Starting from a Foucauldian notion of discourse, "information poverty" is examined as a statement in its relation to other statements in order to highlight assumptions and factors contributing to its construction. The analysis is based on repeated and close reading of 35 English language articles published in LIS journals between 1995 and 2005. Findings - Four especially productive discursive procedures are identified: economic determinism, technological determinism and the "information society", historicising the "information poor", and the library profession's moral obligation and responsibility. Research limitations/implications - The material selection is linguistically and geographically biased. Most of the included articles originate in English-speaking countries. Therefore, results and findings are fully applicable only in an English language context. Originality/value - The focus on overlapping and at times conflicting discursive procedures, i.e. the results of alliances and connections between statements, highlights how the "information poor" emerge as a category in LIS as the product of institutionally contingent, professional discourse. By challenging often unquestioned underlying assumptions, this article is intended to contribute to a critical examination of LIS discourse, as well as to the analysis of the discourses of information, which dominate contemporary society. It is furthermore seen to add to the development of discourse analytical approaches in LIS research.