Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

Wu, H.; Salton, G.: ¬The estimation of term relevance weights using relevance feedback (1981) 0.05

0.04516854 = product of:
  0.18067417 = sum of:
    0.18067417 = weight(_text_:term in 4728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18067417 = score(doc=4728,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04694356 = queryNorm
        0.8248453 = fieldWeight in 4728, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4728)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Salton, G.; Yang, C.S.: On the specification of term values in automatic indexing (1973) 0.05

0.04516854 = product of:
  0.18067417 = sum of:
    0.18067417 = weight(_text_:term in 5476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18067417 = score(doc=5476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04694356 = queryNorm
        0.8248453 = fieldWeight in 5476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5476)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Salton, G.; Waldstein, R.H.: Term relevance weights in on-line information retrieval (1978) 0.05

0.04516854 = product of:
  0.18067417 = sum of:
    0.18067417 = weight(_text_:term in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18067417 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04694356 = queryNorm
        0.8248453 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Yu, C.T.; Salton, G.: Effective information retrieval using term accuracy (1971) 0.05

0.04516854 = product of:
  0.18067417 = sum of:
    0.18067417 = weight(_text_:term in 5485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18067417 = score(doc=5485,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04694356 = queryNorm
        0.8248453 = fieldWeight in 5485, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5485)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Yu, C.T.; Salton, G.; Siu, M.K.: Effective automatic indexing using term addition and deletion (1978) 0.04

0.039522473 = product of:
  0.15808989 = sum of:
    0.15808989 = weight(_text_:term in 2859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15808989 = score(doc=2859,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04694356 = queryNorm
        0.72173965 = fieldWeight in 2859, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2859)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval (1988) 0.03

0.033876404 = product of:
  0.13550562 = sum of:
    0.13550562 = weight(_text_:term in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13550562 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04694356 = queryNorm
        0.618634 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Salton, G.; Buckley, C.: Approaches to global text analysis (1990) 0.02
```
0.019761236 = product of:
  0.079044946 = sum of:
    0.079044946 = weight(_text_:term in 4901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079044946 = score(doc=4901,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21904005 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04694356 = queryNorm
        0.36086982 = fieldWeight in 4901, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.66603 = idf(docFreq=1130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4901)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Current approaches to the analysis of natural language text are not viable for documents of unrestricted scope. A global text analysis system is proposed designed to identify homogeneous text environments in which the meaning of text words and phrases remains unambiguous, and useful term relationships may be automatically determined. The proposed methods include document clustering methods, as well as comparisons of local document excerpts in specified global contexts, leading to structured text representations in which similar texts, or text excerpts, are appropriately linked

Salton, G.: Future prospects for text-based information retrieval (1990) 0.00

0.0035313342 = product of:
  0.014125337 = sum of:
    0.014125337 = product of:
      0.056501348 = sum of:
        0.056501348 = weight(_text_:based in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056501348 = score(doc=2327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.39947033 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Salton, G.: Thoughts about modern retrieval technologies (1988) 0.00
```
0.002059945 = product of:
  0.00823978 = sum of:
    0.00823978 = product of:
      0.03295912 = sum of:
        0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 1522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03295912 = score(doc=1522,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 1522, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1522)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the National Federation of Astracting and Information Services, Philadelphia, 28 Feb-2 Mar 88. In recent years, the amount and the variety of available machine-readable data, new technologies have been introduced, such as high density storage devices, and fancy graphic displays useful for information transformation and access. New approaches have also been considered for processing the stored data based on the construction of knowledge bases representing the contents and structure of the information, and the use of expert system techniques to control the user-system interactions. Provides a brief evaluation of the new information processing technologies, and of the software methods proposed for information manipulation.
Lesk, M.E.; Salton, G.: Relevance assements and retrieval system evaluation (1969) 0.00
```
0.002059945 = product of:
  0.00823978 = sum of:
    0.00823978 = product of:
      0.03295912 = sum of:
        0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 4151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03295912 = score(doc=4151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 4151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4151)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Two widerly used criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems are, respectively, the recall and the precision. Since the determiniation of these measures is dependent on a distinction between documents which are relevant to a given query and documents which are not relevant to that query, it has sometimes been claimed that an accurate, generally valid evaluation cannot be based on recall and precision measure. A study was made to determine the effect of variations in relevance assesments do not produce significant variations in average recall and precision. It thus appears that properly computed recall and precision data may represent effectiveness indicators which are gemerally valid for many distinct user classes.
Salton, G.: Automatic text structuring and summarization (1997) 0.00
```
0.002059945 = product of:
  0.00823978 = sum of:
    0.00823978 = product of:
      0.03295912 = sum of:
        0.03295912 = weight(_text_:based in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03295912 = score(doc=145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04694356 = queryNorm
            0.23302436 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Applies the ideas from the automatic link generation research to automatic text summarisation. Using techniques for inter-document link generation, generates intra-document links between passages of a document. Based on the intra-document linkage pattern of a text, characterises the structure of the text. Applies the knowledge of text structure to do automatic text summarisation by passage extraction. Evaluates a set of 50 summaries generated using these techniques by comparing the to paragraph extracts constructed by humans. The automatic summarisation methods perform well, especially in view of the fact that the summaries generates by 2 humans for the same article are surprisingly dissimilar

Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes