-
Terrill, L.J.: ¬The state of cataloging research : an analysis of peer-reviewed journal literature, 2010-2014 (2016)
0.01
0.013833362 = product of:
0.055333447 = sum of:
0.055333447 = product of:
0.11066689 = sum of:
0.11066689 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11066689 = score(doc=5137,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25917634 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 5137, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5137)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The importance of cataloging research was highlighted by a resolution declaring 2010 as "The Year of Cataloging Research." This study of the peer-reviewed journal literature from 2010 to 2014 examined the state of cataloging literature since this proclamation. The goals were to determine the percentage of cataloging literature that can be classified as research, what research methods were used, and whether the articles contributed to the library assessment conversation. Nearly a quarter of the cataloging literature qualifies as research; however, a majority of researchers fail to make explicit connections between their work and the missions of their libraries.
-
Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011)
0.01
0.011130357 = product of:
0.04452143 = sum of:
0.04452143 = product of:
0.08904286 = sum of:
0.08904286 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08904286 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 27.12.2014 18:54:22
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.01
0.0055651786 = product of:
0.022260714 = sum of:
0.022260714 = product of:
0.04452143 = sum of:
0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452143 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015)
0.01
0.0055651786 = product of:
0.022260714 = sum of:
0.022260714 = product of:
0.04452143 = sum of:
0.04452143 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04452143 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 6.2015 16:13:38
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.00
0.0047701527 = product of:
0.019080611 = sum of:
0.019080611 = product of:
0.038161222 = sum of:
0.038161222 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038161222 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16438834 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Sugimoto, C.R.; Work, S.; Larivière, V.; Haustein, S.: Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics : A review of the literature (2017)
0.00
0.0017656671 = product of:
0.0070626684 = sum of:
0.0070626684 = product of:
0.028250674 = sum of:
0.028250674 = weight(_text_:based in 3781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028250674 = score(doc=3781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14144066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.04694356 = queryNorm
0.19973516 = fieldWeight in 3781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0129938 = idf(docFreq=5906, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3781)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Social media has become integrated into the fabric of the scholarly communication system in fundamental ways, principally through scholarly use of social media platforms and the promotion of new indicators on the basis of interactions with these platforms. Research and scholarship in this area has accelerated since the coining and subsequent advocacy for altmetrics-that is, research indicators based on social media activity. This review provides an extensive account of the state-of-the art in both scholarly use of social media and altmetrics. The review consists of 2 main parts: the first examines the use of social media in academia, reviewing the various functions these platforms have in the scholarly communication process and the factors that affect this use. The second part reviews empirical studies of altmetrics, discussing the various interpretations of altmetrics, data collection and methodological limitations, and differences according to platform. The review ends with a critical discussion of the implications of this transformation in the scholarly communication system.
