Search (179 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Foster, W.: OPAC design : a library school perspective (1988) 0.08 
    0.08248465 = product of:
  0.24745393 = sum of:
    0.24745393 = product of:
      0.49490786 = sum of:
        0.49490786 = weight(_text_:designer in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49490786 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36824805 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            1.3439524 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Influencing the system designer. Online public access to library files, 3rd National Conf
  2. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.08 
    0.07829775 = product of:
  0.11744662 = sum of:
    0.09119617 = weight(_text_:web in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09119617 = score(doc=2905,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  3. Wimmer, W.: Mit dem 'Surfbrett' in die Bibliothek : der World-Wide-Web Katalog der Bibliothek der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (1996) 0.07 
    0.07184853 = product of:
  0.10777278 = sum of:
    0.06839713 = weight(_text_:web in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06839713 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
    0.03937566 = product of:
      0.07875132 = sum of:
        0.07875132 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07875132 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 4.1996 20:07:57
  4. Davis, E.; Stone, J.: ¬A painless route on to the Web : Web services 1: The Royal Postgraduate Medical School (1997) 0.06 
    0.06049058 = product of:
  0.09073587 = sum of:
    0.06448543 = weight(_text_:web in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06448543 = score(doc=1632,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    29. 7.1998 21:22:27
  5. Green, E.; Head, A.J.: Web-based catalogs : is their design language anything to talk about? (1998) 0.06 
    0.06049058 = product of:
  0.09073587 = sum of:
    0.06448543 = weight(_text_:web in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06448543 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Stanford University's Socrates II and University of California at Berkeley's Pathfinder are 2 USA World Wide Web based online publication access catalogues under development. They differ in their design language (how an interface functionally and visually communicates to the users). Evaluates each system's interface design and their ability to communicate functionality to users: analyzes design in terms of: colour, buttons, metaphors, layout, and basic and advanced search modes. Concludes that the design languages of both systems have the right directive and have the potential to evolve
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.98-105
  6. Schnelling, H.: OPAC design : a European perspective (1988) 0.05 
    0.051552903 = product of:
  0.1546587 = sum of:
    0.1546587 = product of:
      0.3093174 = sum of:
        0.3093174 = weight(_text_:designer in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3093174 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36824805 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.83997023 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Influencing the system designer: online public access to library files; proceedings of the 3rd National Conference held at Bath University, England, 12-15 September 1987. Ed.: L. Dempsey
  7. Blosser, J.; Michaelson, R.; Routh. R.; Xia, P.: Defining the landscape of Web resources : Concluding Report of the BAER Web Resources Sub-Group (2000) 0.05 
    0.048963882 = product of:
  0.07344582 = sum of:
    0.0603206 = weight(_text_:web in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0603206 = score(doc=1447,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.38159183 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
    0.01312522 = product of:
      0.02625044 = sum of:
        0.02625044 = weight(_text_:22 in 1447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02625044 = score(doc=1447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The BAER Web Resources Group was charged in October 1999 with defining and describing the parameters of electronic resources that do not clearly belong to the categories being defined by the BAER Digital Group or the BAER Electronic Journals Group. After some difficulty identifying precisely which resources fell under the Group's charge, we finally named the following types of resources for our consideration: web sites, electronic texts, indexes, databases and abstracts, online reference resources, and networked and non-networked CD-ROMs. Electronic resources are a vast and growing collection that touch nearly every department within the Library. It is unrealistic to think one department can effectively administer all aspects of the collection. The Group then began to focus on the concern of bibliographic access to these varied resources, and to define parameters for handling or processing them within the Library. Some key elements became evident as the work progressed. * Selection process of resources to be acquired for the collection * Duplication of effort * Use of CORC * Resource Finder design * Maintenance of Resource Finder * CD-ROMs not networked * Communications * Voyager search limitations. An unexpected collaboration with the Web Development Committee on the Resource Finder helped to steer the Group to more detailed descriptions of bibliographic access. This collaboration included development of data elements for the Resource Finder database, and some discussions on Library staff processing of the resources. The Web Resources Group invited expert testimony to help the Group broaden its view to envision public use of the resources and discuss concerns related to technical services processing. The first testimony came from members of the Resource Finder Committee. Some background information on the Web Development Resource Finder Committee was shared. The second testimony was from librarians who select electronic texts. Three main themes were addressed: accessing CD-ROMs; the issue of including non-networked CD-ROMs in the Resource Finder; and, some special concerns about electronic texts. The third testimony came from librarians who select indexes and abstracts and also provide Reference services. Appendices to this report include minutes of the meetings with the experts (Appendix A), a list of proposed data elements to be used in the Resource Finder (Appendix B), and recommendations made to the Resource Finder Committee (Appendix C). Below are summaries of the key elements.
    Date
    21. 4.2002 10:22:31
  8. Dierolf, U.; Mönnich, M.: Karlsruher Virtueller Katalog (KVK) : neue Dienstleistung im World Wide Web (1996) 0.05 
    0.04789902 = product of:
  0.07184853 = sum of:
    0.045598086 = weight(_text_:web in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045598086 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    21. 9.1996 16:03:22
  9. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.05 
    0.04789902 = product of:
  0.07184853 = sum of:
    0.045598086 = weight(_text_:web in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045598086 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Over the past year, innumerable discussions on the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the newly burgeoning World WideWeb have occured in many libraries and in virtually every library related discussion list. Rumors and speculation abound, some insisting that SGML will replace USMARC "soon," others maintaining that OPACs that haven't migrated to the Web will go the way of the dinosaurs.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  10. Piccotti, P.: ¬Les nouvelles technologies et la recherche documentaire (1998) 0.04 
    0.041911643 = product of:
  0.06286746 = sum of:
    0.03989833 = weight(_text_:web in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03989833 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
    0.022969136 = product of:
      0.045938272 = sum of:
        0.045938272 = weight(_text_:22 in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045938272 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The Venice University Institute of Architecture has developed Easyweb, a software package to integrate its heterogeneous non-compatible bibliographic and multimedia databases, standardise access and create internal links, by transferring all existing OPAC applications to the Web. Features include importation of UNIMARC data, multiple window searching, multibase searching and special applications, e.g. circulation management. Easyweb is notable user friendly and has become the point of reference for OPACs in Italy
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1998, no.178, S.20-22
  11. Influencing the system designer : online public access to library files (1988) 0.04 
    0.041242324 = product of:
  0.123726964 = sum of:
    0.123726964 = product of:
      0.24745393 = sum of:
        0.24745393 = weight(_text_:designer in 7256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24745393 = score(doc=7256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36824805 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.6719762 = fieldWeight in 7256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  12. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.04 
    0.039148875 = product of:
  0.05872331 = sum of:
    0.045598086 = weight(_text_:web in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045598086 = score(doc=2672,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
    0.01312522 = product of:
      0.02625044 = sum of:
        0.02625044 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02625044 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Die verschiedenen unter dem Schlagwort "Bibliothek 2.0" zusammengefassten neuen Dienste und Komponenten wie etwa Wikis, Tagging-Systeme und Blogs sind seit einiger Zeit in aller Munde und dringen über Fortbildungsveranstaltungen, Konferenzen und Publikationsorgane immer mehr in das deutschsprachige Bibliothekswesen ein. Darüber hinaus gibt es öffentlich geförderte Projekte zu bibliothekarischen 2.0-Themen und sogar ein Projekt, welches sich explizit einen 2.0-Katalog zum Ziel gesetzt hat. In diesem Beitrag soll es nun nicht um die Vorstellung eines weiteren Projekts im Dienste des Themas "Bibliothek 2.0" gehen, ebenso hat dieser Beitrag nicht den Anspruch, die Diskussion über die möglichen Vor- oder Nachteile dieser Thematik auf theoretischer Ebene voranzubringen. Vielmehr wird hier ganz praktisch aus Sicht einer kleinen Universitätsbibliothek, der Bibliothek der Helmut-SchmidtUniversität (HSU) - Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, aufgezeigt, wie das Thema "Web/Bibliothek 2.0" durchaus neben und in Unterstützung von weiteren nutzerorientierten Servicedienstleistungen auch in kleinen Schritten positive Auswirkungen für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer haben kann. Der Focus wird dabei auf dem zentralen Arbeits- und Rechercheinstrument der Bibliotheksnutzer liegen, dem Bibliothekskatalog. Speziell wird es darum gehen, wie auf relativ einfache Art und Weise durch Anwendung verschiedener Elemente anderer Dienste und Anbieter sowie das Aufgreifen von Schnittstellen und wenig aufwendigen Verbesserungen, Mehrwert für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer zu erzielen ist. Ein zentraler Begriff bei fast allen Überlegungen, die im Zusammenhang mit der Verbesserung und Anreicherung des Kataloges stehen, war und ist das Thema "Mash-up". Unter Mashups - ein Begriff, der gerade im Zusammenhang mit dem Thema "Web 2.0" im deutschsprachigen Raum eingeführt und adaptiert wurde - wird das Verfahren bezeichnet, Web-Inhalte neu zu kombinieren. Dabei nutzt man bei und für Mashups offene "APIs" (Application Programming Interfaces, also offene Programmierschnittstellen), die von anderen Web-Anwendungen zur Verfügung gestellt werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38
  13. Külper, U.; Will, G.: ¬Das Projekt Bücherschatz : interdisziplinäre und partizipative Entwicklung eines kindgerechten Bibliotheks-Online-Kataloges (1996) 0.04 
    0.036087032 = product of:
  0.10826109 = sum of:
    0.10826109 = product of:
      0.21652219 = sum of:
        0.21652219 = weight(_text_:designer in 4725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21652219 = score(doc=4725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36824805 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.5879792 = fieldWeight in 4725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4725)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 1995 entstand in interdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit der Prototyp Bücherschatz, ein Bibliotheks-Online_katalog für Kinder. Beteiligt waren Studierende und eine Professorin der FH Hamburg, Fb Bibliothek und Information, ein Designer und 2 Informatikerinnen der Universität Hamburg. In diesem Bericht werden sowohl das Produkt Bücherschatz als auch der Prozeß seiner Entwicklung beschrieben. Ein Schwerpunkt liegt in der Auseinandersetzung mit theoretischen Modellen der Softwaretechnik - hier STEPS und Prototyping - und ihrer Anpassung an konkrete Projekterfordernisse. Weiterhin werden Fragen nach der Gestaltung kindgerechter Software, der Organisation eines großen Projektteams und nach der Art der Partizipation der Benutzer thematisiert. Das Gesamtprojekt wird in einen wissenschaftlichen Kontext der Informatik eingeordnet, und zentrale Erfahrungen und Erkenntnisse hinsichtlich interdisziplinärer und partizipativer Softwareentwicklung werden zusammengefaßt
  14. Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004) 0.03 
    0.034255266 = product of:
  0.051382896 = sum of:
    0.03989833 = weight(_text_:web in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03989833 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
    0.011484568 = product of:
      0.022969136 = sum of:
        0.022969136 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022969136 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    "Most Web search engines accept natural language queries, perform some kind of fuzzy matching and produce ranked output, displaying first the documents that are most likely to be relevant. On the other hand, most library online public access catalogs (OPACs) an the Web are still Boolean retrieval systems that perform exact matching, and require users to express their search requests precisely in a Boolean search language and to refine their search statements to improve the search results. It is well-documented that users have difficulty searching Boolean OPACs effectively (e.g. Borgman, 1996; Ensor, 1992; Wallace, 1993). One approach to making OPACs easier to use is to develop a natural language search interface that acts as a middleware between the user's Web browser and the OPAC system. The search interface can accept a natural language query from the user and reformulate it as a series of Boolean search statements that are then submitted to the OPAC. The records retrieved by the OPAC are ranked by the search interface before forwarding them to the user's Web browser. The user, then, does not need to interact directly with the Boolean OPAC but with the natural language search interface or search intermediary. The search interface interacts with the OPAC system an the user's behalf. The advantage of this approach is that no modification to the OPAC or library system is required. Furthermore, the search interface can access multiple OPACs, acting as a meta search engine, and integrate search results from various OPACs before sending them to the user. The search interface needs to incorporate a method for converting the user's natural language query into a series of Boolean search statements, and for ranking the OPAC records retrieved. The purpose of this study was to develop a relevancyranking algorithm for a search interface to Boolean OPAC systems. This is part of an on-going effort to develop a knowledge-based search interface to OPACs called the E-Referencer (Khoo et al., 1998, 1999; Poo et al., 2000). E-Referencer v. 2 that has been implemented applies a repertoire of initial search strategies and reformulation strategies to retrieve records from OPACs using the Z39.50 protocol, and also assists users in mapping query keywords to the Library of Congress subject headings."
    Source
    Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
  15. Long, C.E.: Improving subject searching in Web-based OPACs : evaluation of the problem and guidelines for design (2000) 0.03 
    0.03257685 = product of:
  0.09773055 = sum of:
    0.09773055 = weight(_text_:web in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09773055 = score(doc=6110,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Online catalog users search predominately by subject, yet it is the most difficult search to perform and retrieves records only about one-half of the time. A new generation of OPACs (online public access catalogs) is on the horizon, the Web-based OPAC. Web-based OPACs allow users to access online catalogs through a WWW (World Wide Web) interface and have the potential to improve patrons' ability to search by subject. But will this potential be realized? This article proposes some basic guidelines that can be incorporated into Web-based OPAC interface design to help users perform subject searches more effectively, and evaluates how well Web-based OPACs currently in operation address the subject searching problem
  16. Allen, L.: Towards a learning catalogue : developing the next generation of library catalogues (1993) 0.03 
    0.030931745 = product of:
  0.09279523 = sum of:
    0.09279523 = product of:
      0.18559046 = sum of:
        0.18559046 = weight(_text_:designer in 8192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18559046 = score(doc=8192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36824805 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.5039822 = fieldWeight in 8192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.602543 = idf(docFreq=59, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8192)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Contends that library catalogues need to be seen as merely part of the information seeker's world and proposes the concept of a learning catalogue for library clients which will capture ways in which clients use data thus providing ideas for the further development of the system. Proposes a client centred system which is separated to maintain the bibliographic database from the mode of presentation of that data to the client. The designer of retrieval systems, by accepting that each client brings a unique view of the world's knowledge base to the information seeking activity, needs to acknowledge that this view of the world must be handled uniquely. By overlaying the idea of a learning component, it is possible to see how future queries might be handled more efficiently and the system can grow with client's developing needs
  17. Harmsen, B.: Adding value to Web-OPACs (2000) 0.03 
    0.030398725 = product of:
  0.09119617 = sum of:
    0.09119617 = weight(_text_:web in 4672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09119617 = score(doc=4672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 4672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4672)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  18. Breeding, M.: Thinking about your next OPAC (2007) 0.03 
    0.030398725 = product of:
  0.09119617 = sum of:
    0.09119617 = weight(_text_:web in 6745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09119617 = score(doc=6745,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 6745, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6745)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    It's clear that today's typical library users are Web-sawy and have very high expectations. Librarians need to offer interfaces on Web sites that match or exceed those found on the commercial Web. Paired with high-quality content that's selected and created by librarians, a state-of-the-art Web interface is a compelling destination for users.
  19. Steiner, E.S.: OPAC 2.0 : Mit Web 2.0-Technologie zum Bibliothekskatalog der Zukunft? (2007) 0.03 
    0.030398725 = product of:
  0.09119617 = sum of:
    0.09119617 = weight(_text_:web in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09119617 = score(doc=678,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Diese Arbeit besteht im Wesentlichen aus zwei Teilen: Der erste Teil beinhaltet eine Einführung in den Begriff Web 2.0 und in die allgemeinen Rahmenbedingungen der zugehörigen technischen Entwicklungen. Des Weiteren werden exemplarische Techniken vorgestellt, die Web 2.0 zugeschrieben werden können sowie einige beispielhafte Anwendungen. Im zweiten Teil wird die Diskussion um Bibliothek 2.0 aufgegriffen, um anschließend näher auf Web 2.0 Techniken in Bibliothekskatalogen bzw. den OPAC 2.0 einzugehen. Verschiedene Techniken, die im OPAC 2.0 Anwendung finden können, werden diskutiert und zuletzt werden einige beispielhafte OPACs vorgestellt.
  20. Golderman, G.M.; Connolly, B.: Between the book covers : going beyond OPAC keyword searching with the deep linking capabilities of Google Scholar and Google Book Search (2004/05) 0.03 
    0.029936887 = product of:
  0.04490533 = sum of:
    0.028498804 = weight(_text_:web in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028498804 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
    0.016406527 = product of:
      0.032813054 = sum of:
        0.032813054 = weight(_text_:22 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032813054 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    One finding of the 2006 OCLC study of College Students' Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources was that students expressed equal levels of trust in libraries and search engines when it came to meeting their information needs in a way that they felt was authoritative. Seeking to incorporate this insight into our own instructional methodology, Schaffer Library at Union College has attempted to engineer a shift from Google to Google Scholar among our student users by representing Scholar as a viable adjunct to the catalog and to snore traditional electronic resources. By attempting to engage student researchers on their own terms, we have discovered that most of them react enthusiastically to the revelation that the Google they think they know so well is, it turns out, a multifaceted resource that is capable of delivering the sort of scholarly information that will meet with their professors' approval. Specifically, this article focuses on the fact that many Google Scholar searches link hack to our own Web catalog where they identify useful book titles that direct OPAC keyword searches have missed.
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:39:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 158
  • el 10
  • s 6
  • x 6
  • m 5
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications