Search (298 results, page 1 of 15)

0.08547392 = product of:
  0.12821087 = sum of:
    0.10196043 = weight(_text_:web in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10196043 = score(doc=4685,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This document contains and presents test cases for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) approved by the Web Ontology Working Group. Many of the test cases illustrate the correct usage of the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the formal meaning of its constructs. Other test cases illustrate the resolution of issues considered by the Working Group. Conformance for OWL documents and OWL document checkers is specified.

Date

14. 8.2011 13:33:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.08152235 = product of:
  0.122283526 = sum of:
    0.102595694 = weight(_text_:web in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102595694 = score(doc=4649,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.64902663 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
    0.01968783 = product of:
      0.03937566 = sum of:
        0.03937566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03937566 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.

Date

26.12.2011 13:40:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.08046646 = product of:
  0.12069968 = sum of:
    0.09773055 = weight(_text_:web in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09773055 = score(doc=4330,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
    0.022969136 = product of:
      0.045938272 = sum of:
        0.045938272 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045938272 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

One vision of the Semantic Web is that it will be much like the Web we know today, except that documents will be enriched by annotations in machine understandable markup. These annotations will provide metadata about the documents as well as machine interpretable statements capturing some of the meaning of document content. We discuss how the information retrieval paradigm might be recast in such an environment. We suggest that retrieval can be tightly bound to inference. Doing so makes today's Web search engines useful to Semantic Web inference engines, and causes improvements in either retrieval or inference to lead directly to improvements in the other.

Date

12. 2.2011 17:35:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.07344583 = product of:
  0.11016874 = sum of:
    0.09048091 = weight(_text_:web in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09048091 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
    0.01968783 = product of:
      0.03937566 = sum of:
        0.03937566 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03937566 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.

Date

23. 7.2017 13:49:22

LCSH

Semantic Web
World Wide Web / Subject access

RSWK

Semantic Web

Subject

Semantic Web
World Wide Web / Subject access
Semantic Web

0.07015243 = product of:
  0.10522865 = sum of:
    0.0789782 = weight(_text_:web in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0789782 = score(doc=3376,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
    0.02625044 = product of:
      0.05250088 = sum of:
        0.05250088 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05250088 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This chapter presents ontologies and their role in the creation of the Semantic Web. Ontologies hold special interest, because they are very closely related to the way we understand the world. They provide common understanding, the very first step to successful communication. In following sections, we will present ontologies, how they are created and used. We will describe available tools for specifying and working with ontologies.

Date

31. 7.2010 16:58:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.05872331 = product of:
  0.08808496 = sum of:
    0.06839713 = weight(_text_:web in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06839713 = score(doc=2418,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
    0.01968783 = product of:
      0.03937566 = sum of:
        0.03937566 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03937566 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Integrated digital access to multiple collections is a prominent issue for many Cultural Heritage institutions. The metadata describing diverse collections must be interoperable, which requires aligning the controlled vocabularies that are used to annotate objects from these collections. In this paper, we present an experiment where we match the vocabularies of two collections by applying the Knowledge Representation techniques established in recent Semantic Web research. We discuss the steps that are required for such matching, namely formalising the initial resources using Semantic Web languages, and running ontology mapping tools on the resulting representations. In addition, we present a prototype that enables the user to browse the two collections using the obtained alignment while still providing her with the original vocabulary structures.

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006

Theme

Semantic Web

0.05568695 = product of:
  0.083530426 = sum of:
    0.05128771 = product of:
      0.15386313 = sum of:
        0.15386313 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15386313 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41065353 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.032242715 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032242715 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

Theme

Semantic Web

0.04893609 = product of:
  0.07340413 = sum of:
    0.05699761 = weight(_text_:web in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05699761 = score(doc=2829,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
    0.016406527 = product of:
      0.032813054 = sum of:
        0.032813054 = weight(_text_:22 in 2829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032813054 = score(doc=2829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2829)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Knowledge organization faces the challenge of managing the amount of knowledge available on the Web. Published literature in biomedical sciences is a huge source of knowledge, which can only efficiently be managed through automatic methods. The conventional channel for reporting scientific results is Web electronic publishing. Despite its advances, scientific articles are still published in print formats such as portable document format (PDF). Semantic Web and Linked Data technologies provides new opportunities for communicating, sharing, and integrating scientific knowledge that can overcome the limitations of the current print format. Here is proposed a semantic model of scholarly electronic articles in biomedical sciences that can overcome the limitations of traditional flat records formats. Scientific knowledge consists of claims made throughout article texts, especially when semantic elements such as questions, hypotheses and conclusions are stated. These elements, although having different roles, express relationships between phenomena. Once such knowledge units are extracted and represented with technologies such as RDF (Resource Description Framework) and linked data, they may be integrated in reasoning chains. Thereby, the results of scientific research can be published and shared in structured formats, enabling crawling by software agents, semantic retrieval, knowledge reuse, validation of scientific results, and identification of traces of scientific discoveries.

Date

12. 3.2016 13:17:22

0.045367938 = product of:
  0.068051904 = sum of:
    0.048364073 = weight(_text_:web in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048364073 = score(doc=4011,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
    0.01968783 = product of:
      0.03937566 = sum of:
        0.03937566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03937566 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Das CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM) ist eine Ontologie für den Bereich des Kulturellen Erbes, die als ISO 21127 standardisiert ist. Inzwischen liegen auch OWL-DL-Implementationen des CRM vor, die ihren Einsatz auch im Semantic Web ermöglicht. OWL-DL ist eine entscheidbare Untermenge der Web Ontology Language, die vom W3C spezifiziert wurde. Lokale Anwendungsontologien, die ebenfalls in OWL-DL modelliert werden, können über Subklassenbeziehungen mit dem CRM als Referenzontologie verbunden werden. Dadurch wird es automatischen Prozessen ermöglicht, autonom heterogene Daten semantisch zu validieren, zueinander in Bezug zu setzen und Anfragen über verschiedene Datenbestände innerhalb der Wissensdomäne zu verarbeiten und zu beantworten.

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

0.045367938 = product of:
  0.068051904 = sum of:
    0.048364073 = weight(_text_:web in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048364073 = score(doc=3387,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
    0.01968783 = product of:
      0.03937566 = sum of:
        0.03937566 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03937566 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.

Date

1. 8.2010 12:35:22

0.043845274 = product of:
  0.06576791 = sum of:
    0.049361378 = weight(_text_:web in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049361378 = score(doc=1434,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
    0.016406527 = product of:
      0.032813054 = sum of:
        0.032813054 = weight(_text_:22 in 1434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032813054 = score(doc=1434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1434)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Knowledge organization of large-scale content on the Web requires substantial amounts of semantic metadata that is expensive to generate manually. Recent developments in Web technologies have enabled any user to tag documents and other forms of content thereby generating metadata that could help organize knowledge. However, merely adding one or more tags to a document is highly inadequate to capture the aboutness of the document and thereby to support powerful semantic functions such as automatic classification, question answering or true semantic search and retrieval. This is true even when the tags used are labels from a well-designed classification system such as a thesaurus or taxonomy. There is a strong need to develop a semantic tagging mechanism with sufficient expressive power to capture the aboutness of each part of a document or dataset or multimedia content in order to enable applications that can benefit from knowledge organization on the Web. This article proposes a highly expressive mechanism of using ontology snippets as semantic tags that map portions of a document or a part of a dataset or a segment of a multimedia content to concepts and relations in an ontology of the domain(s) of interest.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.043845274 = product of:
  0.06576791 = sum of:
    0.049361378 = weight(_text_:web in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049361378 = score(doc=4553,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
    0.016406527 = product of:
      0.032813054 = sum of:
        0.032813054 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032813054 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Semantic Web knowledge representation standards, and in particular RDF and OWL, often come endowed with a formal semantics which is considered to be of fundamental importance for the field. Reasoning, i.e., the drawing of logical inferences from knowledge expressed in such standards, is traditionally based on logical deductive methods and algorithms which can be proven to be sound and complete and terminating, i.e. correct in a very strong sense. For various reasons, though, in particular the scalability issues arising from the ever increasing amounts of Semantic Web data available and the inability of deductive algorithms to deal with noise in the data, it has been argued that alternative means of reasoning should be investigated which bear high promise for high scalability and better robustness. From this perspective, deductive algorithms can be considered the gold standard regarding correctness against which alternative methods need to be tested. In this paper, we show that it is possible to train a Deep Learning system on RDF knowledge graphs, such that it is able to perform reasoning over new RDF knowledge graphs, with high precision and recall compared to the deductive gold standard.

Date

16.11.2018 14:22:01

Theme

Semantic Web

0.043532647 = product of:
  0.13059793 = sum of:
    0.13059793 = weight(_text_:web in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13059793 = score(doc=4706,freq=42.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.8261705 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
          6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
            42.0 = termFreq=42.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.

RSWK

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

Subject

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

Theme

Semantic Web

0.041911643 = product of:
  0.06286746 = sum of:
    0.03989833 = weight(_text_:web in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03989833 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
    0.022969136 = product of:
      0.045938272 = sum of:
        0.045938272 = weight(_text_:22 in 3694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045938272 = score(doc=3694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

A method to develop a prototype domain ontology has been described. The domain selected for the study is Accelerator Driven Systems. This is a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary subject comprising Nuclear Physics, Nuclear and Reactor Engineering, Reactor Fuels and Radioactive Waste Management. Since Accelerator Driven Systems is a vast topic, select areas in it were singled out for the study. Both qualitative and quantitative methods such as Content analysis, Facet analysis and Clustering were used, to develop the web-based model.

Date

22. 7.2010 19:41:16

0.041911643 = product of:
  0.06286746 = sum of:
    0.03989833 = weight(_text_:web in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03989833 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
    0.022969136 = product of:
      0.045938272 = sum of:
        0.045938272 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045938272 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This paper describes to construct faceted ontologies for domain modeling. Building upon the faceted theory of S.R. Ranganathan (1967), the paper intends to address the faceted classification approach applied to build domain ontologies. As classificatory ontologies are employed to represent the relationships of entities and objects on the web, the faceted approach helps to analyze domain representation in an effective way for modeling. Based on this perspective, an ontology of the music domain has been analyzed that would serve as a case study.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.039898325 = product of:
  0.11969497 = sum of:
    0.11969497 = weight(_text_:web in 4061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11969497 = score(doc=4061,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.75719774 = fieldWeight in 4061, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4061)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Dieser Artikel gibt einen Einblick in die aktuelle Verschmelzung von Web 2.0-und Semantic Web-Ansätzen, die als Social Semantic Web beschrieben werden kann. Die Grundidee des Social Semantic Web wird beschrieben und einzelne erste Anwendungsbeispiele vorgestellt. Ein wesentlicher Schwerpunkt dieser Entwicklung besteht in der Umsetzung neuer Methoden und Herangehensweisen im Bereich der Wissensrepräsentation. Dieser Artikel stellt vier Schwerpunkte vor, in denen sich die Wissensrepräsentationsmethoden im Social Semantic Web weiterentwickeln müssen und geht dabei jeweils auf den aktuellen Stand ein.

Object

Web 2.0

Source

Semantic web & linked data: Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen ; 1. DGI-Konferenz ; 62. Jahrestagung der DGI ; Frankfurt am Main, 7. - 9. Oktober 2010 ; Proceedings / Deutsche Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld

Theme

Semantic Web

0.039898325 = product of:
  0.11969497 = sum of:
    0.11969497 = weight(_text_:web in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11969497 = score(doc=3939,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.75719774 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The Semantic Web has attracted much attention, both from academia and industry. An important role in research towards the Semantic Web is played by formalisms and technologies for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness. In this paper, I first provide some motivating examples for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web. I then give an overview of some own formalisms for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web.

Series

Lecture Notes in Computer Scienc;10370) (Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI

Source

Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al

Theme

Semantic Web

0.037998408 = product of:
  0.11399522 = sum of:
    0.11399522 = weight(_text_:web in 7190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11399522 = score(doc=7190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.72114074 = fieldWeight in 7190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7190)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.036048457 = product of:
  0.10814536 = sum of:
    0.10814536 = weight(_text_:web in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10814536 = score(doc=439,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, heldin Heraklion, Crete, Greece in May/June 2005. The 48 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 148 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on semantic Web services, languages, ontologies, reasoning and querying, search and information retrieval, user and communities, natural language for the semantic Web, annotation tools, and semantic Web applications.

RSWK

Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>

Subject

Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>

Theme

Semantic Web

0.035924263 = product of:
  0.05388639 = sum of:
    0.034198564 = weight(_text_:web in 4095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034198564 = score(doc=4095,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15807624 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048437484 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 4095, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4095)
    0.01968783 = product of:
      0.03937566 = sum of:
        0.03937566 = weight(_text_:22 in 4095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03937566 = score(doc=4095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16961981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048437484 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Das Konzept des Semantic Web befindet sich gegenwärtig auf dem Weg von der Vision zur Realisierung und ist "noch gestaltbar", ebenso wie eine seiner Grundkonzeptionen, die Ontologie. Trotz der stetig wachsenden Anzahl der Forschungsarbeiten werden Ontologien primär aus der Sicht semantischer Technologien untersucht, Probleme der Ontologie als Begriffssystem werden in der Ontologieforschung nur partiell angetastet - für die praktische Arbeit erweist sich dieses als bedeutender Mangel. In diesem Bericht wird die Notwendigkeit, eine Ontologie aus der Sicht der Dokumentationssprache zu erforschen, als Fragestellung formuliert, außerdem werden einige schon erarbeitete theoretische Ansätze skizzenhaft dargestellt. Als Beispiel aus der Praxis wird das Material des von der DFG geförderten und am Hermann von Helmholtz-Zentrum für Kulturtechnik der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin durchgeführten Projektes "Entwicklung einer Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen" einbezogen.

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly