Search (53 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.11104182 = product of:
  0.27760455 = sum of:
    0.23714541 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23714541 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42195338 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.040459152 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040459152 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.05 
    0.04742908 = product of:
  0.23714541 = sum of:
    0.23714541 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23714541 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42195338 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  3. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.02 
    0.021578215 = product of:
  0.107891075 = sum of:
    0.107891075 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.107891075 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  4. McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996) 0.02 
    0.01888094 = product of:
  0.09440469 = sum of:
    0.09440469 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09440469 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
  5. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.02 
    0.01888094 = product of:
  0.09440469 = sum of:
    0.09440469 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09440469 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  6. Somers, H.: Example-based machine translation : Review article (1999) 0.02 
    0.01888094 = product of:
  0.09440469 = sum of:
    0.09440469 = weight(_text_:22 in 6672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09440469 = score(doc=6672,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6672, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6672)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  7. New tools for human translators (1997) 0.02 
    0.01888094 = product of:
  0.09440469 = sum of:
    0.09440469 = weight(_text_:22 in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09440469 = score(doc=1179,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  8. Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997) 0.02 
    0.01888094 = product of:
  0.09440469 = sum of:
    0.09440469 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09440469 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 2.1999 10:48:22
  9. ¬Der Student aus dem Computer (2023) 0.02 
    0.01888094 = product of:
  0.09440469 = sum of:
    0.09440469 = weight(_text_:22 in 1079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09440469 = score(doc=1079,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1079, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1079)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 1.2023 16:22:55
  10. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.02 
    0.016183661 = product of:
  0.080918305 = sum of:
    0.080918305 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.080918305 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  11. Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009) 0.02 
    0.016183661 = product of:
  0.080918305 = sum of:
    0.080918305 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.080918305 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 3.2013 14:56:22
  12. Monnerjahn, P.: Vorsprung ohne Technik : Übersetzen: Computer und Qualität (2000) 0.02 
    0.016183661 = product of:
  0.080918305 = sum of:
    0.080918305 = weight(_text_:22 in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.080918305 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.230-231
  13. Rötzer, F.: Computer ergooglen die Bedeutung von Worten (2005) 0.02 
    0.01515269 = product of:
  0.07576345 = sum of:
    0.07576345 = weight(_text_:zahlen in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07576345 = score(doc=3385,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33728883 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.22462484 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.7769065 = idf(docFreq=136, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Mit einem bereits zuvor von Paul Vitanyi und anderen entwickeltem Verfahren, das den Zusammenhang von Objekten misst (normalized information distance - NID ), kann die Nähe zwischen bestimmten Objekten (Bilder, Worte, Muster, Intervalle, Genome, Programme etc.) anhand aller Eigenschaften analysiert und aufgrund der dominanten gemeinsamen Eigenschaft bestimmt werden. Ähnlich können auch die allgemein verwendeten, nicht unbedingt "wahren" Bedeutungen von Namen mit der Google-Suche erschlossen werden. 'At this moment one database stands out as the pinnacle of computer-accessible human knowledge and the most inclusive summary of statistical information: the Google search engine. There can be no doubt that Google has already enabled science to accelerate tremendously and revolutionized the research process. It has dominated the attention of internet users for years, and has recently attracted substantial attention of many Wall Street investors, even reshaping their ideas of company financing.' (Paul Vitanyi und Rudi Cilibrasi) Gibt man ein Wort ein wie beispielsweise "Pferd", erhält man bei Google 4.310.000 indexierte Seiten. Für "Reiter" sind es 3.400.000 Seiten. Kombiniert man beide Begriffe, werden noch 315.000 Seiten erfasst. Für das gemeinsame Auftreten beispielsweise von "Pferd" und "Bart" werden zwar noch immer erstaunliche 67.100 Seiten aufgeführt, aber man sieht schon, dass "Pferd" und "Reiter" enger zusammen hängen. Daraus ergibt sich eine bestimmte Wahrscheinlichkeit für das gemeinsame Auftreten von Begriffen. Aus dieser Häufigkeit, die sich im Vergleich mit der maximalen Menge (5.000.000.000) an indexierten Seiten ergibt, haben die beiden Wissenschaftler eine statistische Größe entwickelt, die sie "normalised Google distance" (NGD) nennen und die normalerweise zwischen 0 und 1 liegt. Je geringer NGD ist, desto enger hängen zwei Begriffe zusammen. "Das ist eine automatische Bedeutungsgenerierung", sagt Vitanyi gegenüber dern New Scientist (4). "Das könnte gut eine Möglichkeit darstellen, einen Computer Dinge verstehen und halbintelligent handeln zu lassen." Werden solche Suchen immer wieder durchgeführt, lässt sich eine Karte für die Verbindungen von Worten erstellen. Und aus dieser Karte wiederum kann ein Computer, so die Hoffnung, auch die Bedeutung der einzelnen Worte in unterschiedlichen natürlichen Sprachen und Kontexten erfassen. So habe man über einige Suchen realisiert, dass ein Computer zwischen Farben und Zahlen unterscheiden, holländische Maler aus dem 17. Jahrhundert und Notfälle sowie Fast-Notfälle auseinander halten oder elektrische oder religiöse Begriffe verstehen könne. Überdies habe eine einfache automatische Übersetzung Englisch-Spanisch bewerkstelligt werden können. Auf diese Weise ließe sich auch, so hoffen die Wissenschaftler, die Bedeutung von Worten erlernen, könne man Spracherkennung verbessern oder ein semantisches Web erstellen und natürlich endlich eine bessere automatische Übersetzung von einer Sprache in die andere realisieren.
  14. Hutchins, J.: From first conception to first demonstration : the nascent years of machine translation, 1947-1954. A chronology (1997) 0.01 
    0.013486384 = product of:
  0.06743192 = sum of:
    0.06743192 = weight(_text_:22 in 1463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06743192 = score(doc=1463,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1463, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1463)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  15. Kuhlmann, U.; Monnerjahn, P.: Sprache auf Knopfdruck : Sieben automatische Übersetzungsprogramme im Test (2000) 0.01 
    0.013486384 = product of:
  0.06743192 = sum of:
    0.06743192 = weight(_text_:22 in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06743192 = score(doc=5428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    c't. 2000, H.22, S.220-229
  16. Lezius, W.; Rapp, R.; Wettler, M.: ¬A morphology-system and part-of-speech tagger for German (1996) 0.01 
    0.013486384 = product of:
  0.06743192 = sum of:
    0.06743192 = weight(_text_:22 in 1693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06743192 = score(doc=1693,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1693, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1693)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2015 9:37:18
  17. Wanner, L.: Lexical choice in text generation and machine translation (1996) 0.01 
    0.0107891075 = product of:
  0.053945538 = sum of:
    0.053945538 = weight(_text_:22 in 8521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053945538 = score(doc=8521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8521)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  18. Riloff, E.: ¬An empirical study of automated dictionary construction for information extraction in three domains (1996) 0.01 
    0.0107891075 = product of:
  0.053945538 = sum of:
    0.053945538 = weight(_text_:22 in 6752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053945538 = score(doc=6752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6752)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  19. Basili, R.; Pazienza, M.T.; Velardi, P.: ¬An empirical symbolic approach to natural language processing (1996) 0.01 
    0.0107891075 = product of:
  0.053945538 = sum of:
    0.053945538 = weight(_text_:22 in 6753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053945538 = score(doc=6753,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6753, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6753)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  20. Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996) 0.01 
    0.0107891075 = product of:
  0.053945538 = sum of:
    0.053945538 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053945538 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1742872 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049770325 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 17

Types

  • a 40
  • el 6
  • m 5
  • s 3
  • p 2
  • x 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications