Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0047349897 = product of:
  0.009469979 = sum of:
    0.009469979 = product of:
      0.028409937 = sum of:
        0.028409937 = weight(_text_:12 in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028409937 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Of the many shelf arrangement systems available for sound recordings there are two main types: those that classify and those that do not. To determine how libraries are arranging their sound recording collections today, a questionnaire was sent to 123 academic music libraries with collections of 5.000 or more sound recordings. Although LCC is used in 78% of the libraries of the libraries for books and in 74% of the libraries for scores, it is used in only 12% of the libraries for sound recordings. Accession number is the clear choice of academic music libraries for the shelving of sound recordings with 66% of the libraries surveyed using it