-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.02
0.01760727 = product of:
0.03521454 = sum of:
0.03521454 = product of:
0.052821808 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 19:12:06
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.01
0.0054214997 = product of:
0.010842999 = sum of:
0.010842999 = product of:
0.032528996 = sum of:
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.01
0.0054214997 = product of:
0.010842999 = sum of:
0.010842999 = product of:
0.032528996 = sum of:
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007)
0.00
0.0033821356 = product of:
0.0067642713 = sum of:
0.0067642713 = product of:
0.020292813 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 17:19:12
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching : an automatic analysis of online syllabuses (2008)
0.00
0.0033821356 = product of:
0.0067642713 = sum of:
0.0067642713 = product of:
0.020292813 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The impact of published academic research in the sciences and social sciences, when measured, is commonly estimated by counting citations from journal articles. The Web has now introduced new potential sources of quantitative data online that could be used to measure aspects of research impact. In this article we assess the extent to which citations from online syllabuses could be a valuable source of evidence about the educational utility of research. An analysis of online syllabus citations to 70,700 articles published in 2003 in the journals of 12 subjects indicates that online syllabus citations were sufficiently numerous to be a useful impact indictor in some social sciences, including political science and information and library science, but not in others, nor in any sciences. This result was consistent with current social science research having, in general, more educational value than current science research. Moreover, articles frequently cited in online syllabuses were not necessarily highly cited by other articles. Hence it seems that online syllabus citations provide a valuable additional source of evidence about the impact of journals, scholars, and research articles in some social sciences.
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Assessing the citation impact of books : the role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)
0.00
0.0033821356 = product of:
0.0067642713 = sum of:
0.0067642713 = product of:
0.020292813 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=4920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 2.2012 18:09:35
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Disseminating research with web CV hyperlinks (2014)
0.00
0.0033821356 = product of:
0.0067642713 = sum of:
0.0067642713 = product of:
0.020292813 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 1331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=1331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 1331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1331)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 7.2014 12:49:30
-
Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? : a survey of user motivations (2016)
0.00
0.0033821356 = product of:
0.0067642713 = sum of:
0.0067642713 = product of:
0.020292813 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 4.2016 12:52:40
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2016)
0.00
0.0033821356 = product of:
0.0067642713 = sum of:
0.0067642713 = product of:
0.020292813 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.12, S.2993-3007
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Patent citation analysis with Google (2017)
0.00
0.0033821356 = product of:
0.0067642713 = sum of:
0.0067642713 = product of:
0.020292813 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2017 12:54:36
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books (2017)
0.00
0.0033821356 = product of:
0.0067642713 = sum of:
0.0067642713 = product of:
0.020292813 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=3768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2017 14:08:12
