Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 0.01
```
0.0054214997 = product of:
  0.010842999 = sum of:
    0.010842999 = product of:
      0.032528996 = sum of:
        0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032528996 = score(doc=2352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

This study examines the differences between Scopus and Web of Science in the citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of 22 top human-computer interaction (HCI) researchers from EQUATOR - a large British Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration project. Results indicate that Scopus provides significantly more coverage of HCI literature than Web of Science, primarily due to coverage of relevant ACM and IEEE peer-reviewed conference proceedings. No significant differences exist between the two databases if citations in journals only are compared. Although broader coverage of the literature does not significantly alter the relative citation ranking of individual researchers, Scopus helps distinguish between the researchers in a more nuanced fashion than Web of Science in both citation counting and h-index. Scopus also generates significantly different maps of citation networks of individual scholars than those generated by Web of Science. The study also presents a comparison of h-index scores based on Google Scholar with those based on the union of Scopus and Web of Science. The study concludes that Scopus can be used as a sole data source for citation-based research and evaluation in HCI, especially when citations in conference proceedings are sought, and that researchers should manually calculate h scores instead of relying on system calculations.

Meho, L.I.: E-Mail interviewing in qualitative research : a methodological discussion (2006) 0.01

0.005411417 = product of:
  0.010822834 = sum of:
    0.010822834 = product of:
      0.0324685 = sum of:
        0.0324685 = weight(_text_:12 in 5701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0324685 = score(doc=5701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 5701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 18. 8.2006 12:19:50

Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: ¬The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies (2008) 0.00

0.0047349897 = product of:
  0.009469979 = sum of:
    0.009469979 = product of:
      0.028409937 = sum of:
        0.028409937 = weight(_text_:12 in 1377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028409937 = score(doc=1377,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 1377, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1377)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 9. 2.2008 17:48:12

Meho, L.I.; Sonnenwald, D.H.: Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance : a case study of Kurdish scholarship (2000) 0.00

0.0040585627 = product of:
  0.008117125 = sum of:
    0.008117125 = product of:
      0.024351375 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=4382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 30. 1.2000 12:31:26

Meho, L.I.; Sugimoto, C.R.: Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies : a tale of two citation databases - Scopus and Web of Science (2009) 0.00

0.0040585627 = product of:
  0.008117125 = sum of:
    0.008117125 = product of:
      0.024351375 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=3298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2499-2508

Meho, L.I.; Yang, K.: Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty : Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007) 0.00

0.0033821356 = product of:
  0.0067642713 = sum of:
    0.0067642713 = product of:
      0.020292813 = sum of:
        0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020292813 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 3.11.2007 12:53:21

Meho, L.I.; Spurgin, K.M.: Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools : an evaluation of data sources and research methods (2005) 0.00

0.0027057086 = product of:
  0.005411417 = sum of:
    0.005411417 = product of:
      0.01623425 = sum of:
        0.01623425 = weight(_text_:12 in 4343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01623425 = score(doc=4343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.12223507 = fieldWeight in 4343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4343)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.12, S.1314-1331

Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Themes