-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.03
0.0326546 = product of:
0.0653092 = sum of:
0.0653092 = product of:
0.097963795 = sum of:
0.045917396 = weight(_text_:12 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045917396 = score(doc=77,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.345733 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.052046396 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052046396 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.02
0.022098586 = product of:
0.044197172 = sum of:
0.044197172 = product of:
0.06629576 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.046002947 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046002947 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.02
0.021128725 = product of:
0.04225745 = sum of:
0.04225745 = product of:
0.06338617 = sum of:
0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024351375 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.039034795 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039034795 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.02
0.021128725 = product of:
0.04225745 = sum of:
0.04225745 = product of:
0.06338617 = sum of:
0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024351375 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.039034795 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039034795 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.12, S.3036-3050
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.02
0.01760727 = product of:
0.03521454 = sum of:
0.03521454 = product of:
0.052821808 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2544-2558
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.02
0.01760727 = product of:
0.03521454 = sum of:
0.03521454 = product of:
0.052821808 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 19:12:06
-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.02
0.01760727 = product of:
0.03521454 = sum of:
0.03521454 = product of:
0.052821808 = sum of:
0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020292813 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
12. 3.2021 18:41:28
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011)
0.01
0.0065057995 = product of:
0.013011599 = sum of:
0.013011599 = product of:
0.039034795 = sum of:
0.039034795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039034795 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:27:06
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.0065057995 = product of:
0.013011599 = sum of:
0.013011599 = product of:
0.039034795 = sum of:
0.039034795 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039034795 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Foster, D.: Male or female gender-polarized YouTube videos are less viewed (2021)
0.01
0.005739675 = product of:
0.01147935 = sum of:
0.01147935 = product of:
0.034438048 = sum of:
0.034438048 = weight(_text_:12 in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034438048 = score(doc=414,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.25929976 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- As one of the world's most visited websites, YouTube is potentially influential for learning gendered attitudes. Nevertheless, despite evidence of gender influences within the site for some topics, the extent to which YouTube reflects or promotes male/female or other gender divides is unknown. This article analyses 10,211 YouTube videos published in 12 months from 2014 to 2015 using commenter-portrayed genders (inferred from usernames) and view counts from the end of 2019. Nonbinary genders are omitted for methodological reasons. Although there were highly male and female topics or themes (e.g., vehicles or beauty) and male or female gendering is the norm, videos with topics attracting both males and females tended to have more viewers (after approximately 5 years) than videos in male or female gendered topics. Similarly, within each topic, videos with gender balanced sets of commenters tend to attract more viewers. Thus, YouTube does not seem to be driving male-female gender differences.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.12, S.1528-1544
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.01
0.0054214997 = product of:
0.010842999 = sum of:
0.010842999 = product of:
0.032528996 = sum of:
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012)
0.01
0.0054214997 = product of:
0.010842999 = sum of:
0.010842999 = product of:
0.032528996 = sum of:
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2012 18:16:22
-
Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)
0.01
0.0054214997 = product of:
0.010842999 = sum of:
0.010842999 = product of:
0.032528996 = sum of:
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.01
0.0054214997 = product of:
0.010842999 = sum of:
0.010842999 = product of:
0.032528996 = sum of:
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Thelwall, M.; Li, X.; Barjak, F.; Robinson, S.: Assessing the international web connectivity of research groups (2008)
0.00
0.004783062 = product of:
0.009566124 = sum of:
0.009566124 = product of:
0.02869837 = sum of:
0.02869837 = weight(_text_:12 in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02869837 = score(doc=1401,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.21608311 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 3.2001 11:34:20
12. 2.2008 14:26:04
-
Thelwall, M.: ¬A comparison of link and URL citation counting (2011)
0.00
0.004783062 = product of:
0.009566124 = sum of:
0.009566124 = product of:
0.02869837 = sum of:
0.02869837 = weight(_text_:12 in 4533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02869837 = score(doc=4533,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.21608311 = fieldWeight in 4533, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4533)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 3.2001 11:34:20
12. 7.2011 18:26:17
-
Thelwall, M.; Wouters, P.; Fry, J.: Information-centered research for large-scale analyses of new information sources (2008)
0.00
0.0047349897 = product of:
0.009469979 = sum of:
0.009469979 = product of:
0.028409937 = sum of:
0.028409937 = weight(_text_:12 in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028409937 = score(doc=1969,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 7.2008 18:45:08
-
Thelwall, M.; Wilkinson, D.: Finding similar academic Web sites with links, bibliometric couplings and colinks (2004)
0.00
0.0040585627 = product of:
0.008117125 = sum of:
0.008117125 = product of:
0.024351375 = sum of:
0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024351375 = score(doc=2571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15. 8.2004 12:14:39
-
Thelwall, M.; Vann, K.; Fairclough, R.: Web issue analysis : an integrated water resource management case study (2006)
0.00
0.0040585627 = product of:
0.008117125 = sum of:
0.008117125 = product of:
0.024351375 = sum of:
0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024351375 = score(doc=5906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 8.2006 12:33:25
-
Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: New versions of PageRank employing alternative Web document models (2004)
0.00
0.0040585627 = product of:
0.008117125 = sum of:
0.008117125 = product of:
0.024351375 = sum of:
0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024351375 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 3.2001 11:34:20
