-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.03
0.028171634 = product of:
0.05634327 = sum of:
0.05634327 = product of:
0.0845149 = sum of:
0.0324685 = weight(_text_:12 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0324685 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.052046396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052046396 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
-
Dominich, S.: Mathematical foundations of information retrieval (2001)
0.02
0.020409122 = product of:
0.040818244 = sum of:
0.040818244 = product of:
0.061227366 = sum of:
0.02869837 = weight(_text_:12 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02869837 = score(doc=1753,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.21608311 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032528996 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 12:26:32
- Series
- Mathematical modelling: theory and applications; 12
-
Hill, M.W.: ¬The impact of information on society : an examination of its nature, value and usage (1999)
0.00
0.0047349897 = product of:
0.009469979 = sum of:
0.009469979 = product of:
0.028409937 = sum of:
0.028409937 = weight(_text_:12 in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028409937 = score(doc=5934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 2.2008 12:51:20
-
Knowledge organization for a global learning society : Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria (2006)
0.00
0.0032528997 = product of:
0.0065057995 = sum of:
0.0065057995 = product of:
0.019517398 = sum of:
0.019517398 = weight(_text_:22 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019517398 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.12.2008 11:22:36
-
Blair, A: Too much to know : managing scholarly information before the modern age (2011)
0.00
0.0027057086 = product of:
0.005411417 = sum of:
0.005411417 = product of:
0.01623425 = sum of:
0.01623425 = weight(_text_:12 in 4474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01623425 = score(doc=4474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.12223507 = fieldWeight in 4474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4474)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1.10.2018 12:06:35
-
Introducing information management : an information research reader (2005)
0.00
0.0013528543 = product of:
0.0027057086 = sum of:
0.0027057086 = product of:
0.008117125 = sum of:
0.008117125 = weight(_text_:12 in 440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008117125 = score(doc=440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.048018172 = queryNorm
0.061117534 = fieldWeight in 440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=440)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Allen strikes a realistic note of the institutional importance of trust across teams of academics and administrators, and subsequently of the political behavior of academics and computer services administrators/ managers and the relation of the latter to information strategy formulation. Research was conducted at 12 university sites, information strategy process documents were analyzed, and 20 informants were interviewed at each site. The study's research focused on cross-case analysis (instead of an iterative approach to collection and analysis of data), research was longitudinal, and a grounded theory approach was employed. According to the author, findings confirm a similar position taken by Pettigrew (1977): "development of information strategy is the outcome of negotiated political relations" (p. 177). And for such negotiated political relations, the author concludes, trust is a necessary ingredient. It is important to reiterate that IM's scope requires a diversity of study methods and methodologies to address all issues involved. A multiplicity of information and IM definitions and the number of local and global issues that must be addressed, along with information's significance as resource and/or commodity in different types of organizations, necessitate diversity in information research. Each chapter has demonstrated a need to cover many aspects of IM and to ensure that there is as much clarity in that effort as possible, and yet differentiation of IM from other related fields such as KM clearly remains a top issue. As with any other effort to define a field's boundaries, the task at hand is not easy, but while definitions and boundaries are being worked out, there is always an opportunity to engage in fruitful discussions about scope and critical issues in information research."
