Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0040585627 = product of:
  0.008117125 = sum of:
    0.008117125 = product of:
      0.024351375 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 3185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=3185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 3185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3185)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

24. 2.2008 12:32:45

0.0027057086 = product of:
  0.005411417 = sum of:
    0.005411417 = product of:
      0.01623425 = sum of:
        0.01623425 = weight(_text_:12 in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01623425 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.12223507 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

28. 5.2007 18:12:55

0.0027057086 = product of:
  0.005411417 = sum of:
    0.005411417 = product of:
      0.01623425 = sum of:
        0.01623425 = weight(_text_:12 in 4952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01623425 = score(doc=4952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.12223507 = fieldWeight in 4952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4952)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 62(2011) no.12, S.2540-2543 (C. Leslie)

0.0023674949 = product of:
  0.0047349897 = sum of:
    0.0047349897 = product of:
      0.014204969 = sum of:
        0.014204969 = weight(_text_:12 in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014204969 = score(doc=2930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.106955685 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

15. 7.2011 18:12:46

0.0019132248 = product of:
  0.0038264496 = sum of:
    0.0038264496 = product of:
      0.011479349 = sum of:
        0.011479349 = weight(_text_:12 in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011479349 = score(doc=68,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.08643325 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

12. 3.1996 19:33:47

Footnote

1. historisch (die Gegenwart aus der Vergangheit heraus verstehen) 2. konstruktivistisch (Individuen konstruieren unter dem Einfluss ihres sozialen Kontexts das Verständnis ihrer Welten) 3. diskursanalytisch (Sprache konstituiert die Konstruktion der Identität und die Ausbildung von Bedeutungen) 4. philosophisch-analytisch (rigorose Analyse von Begriffen und Thesen) 5. kritische Theorie (Analyse versteckter Macht- und Herrschaftsmuster) 6. ethnographisch (Verständnis von Menschen durch Hineinversetzen in deren Kulturen) 7. sozialkognitiv (sowohl das Denken des Individuums als auch dessen sozialer bzw. fachlicher Umraum beeinflussen die Informationsnutzung) 8. kognitiv (Fokus auf das Denken der Individuen im Zusammenhang mit Suche, Auffindung und Nutzung von Information) 9. bibliometrisch (statistische Eigenschaften von Information) 10. physikalisch (Signalübertragung, Informationstheorie) 11. technisch (Informationsbedürfnisse durch immer bessere Systeme und Dienste erfüllen) 12. benutzerorientierte Gestaltung ("usability", Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion) 13. evolutionär (Anwendung von Ergebnissen von Biologie und Evolutionspsychologie auf informationsbezogene Phänomene). Bates Beitrag ist, wie stets, wohldurchdacht, didaktisch gut aufbereitet und in klarer Sprache abgefasst, sodass man ihn mit Freude und Gewinn liest. Zu letzterem trägt auch noch die umfangreiche Liste von Literaturangaben bei, mit der sich insbesondere die 13 genannten Metatheorien optimal weiterverfolgen lassen. . . .

0.0016910678 = product of:
  0.0033821356 = sum of:
    0.0033821356 = product of:
      0.0101464065 = sum of:
        0.0101464065 = weight(_text_:12 in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0101464065 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.07639692 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

The release of Stimulated Recall and Mental Models, therefore, could not have been timelier. It describes an empirical qualitative, case study research conducted by authors Lyn Henderson and Julie Tallman in which they studied the mental models of school librarians teaching K-12 students how to use electronic databases. In this research, funded by the Spencer Foundation, Henderson and Tallman studied and analyzed the mental models of their subjects, six American and four Australian school librarians, as they went about the task of teaching students one-on-one how to access and retrieve the information they needed for class assignments from electronic databases. Each librarian and student underwent a structured pre-lesson interview to ascertain their mental models (the sum of their prior learning and experiences) regarding the upcoming lesson. The lesson followed immediately and was carefully video- and audio-recorded, with the full knowledge of the librarian and her student. After the lessons, both student and librarian were interviewed with the intent of learning what each were thinking and feeling at specific points during the lesson, using the recordings as memory joggers. After the first librarian-pupil session, the student was freed but the librarian was re-studied tutoring a second learner. Again, the teacher and new student were preinterviewed, their lesson was recorded, and they were debriefed using the recordings for stimulated recall. It is important to note here the use of the recordings to create stimulated recall. Though considered a dubious practice by many respected researchers, Henderson and Tallman expend considerable time and effort in this book trying to establish the credibility of stimulated recall as a valid research tool. I find it interesting that the authors report that their realization of the value of stimulated recall was a collateral benefit of their study; they claim the original objective of their research was to analyze and compare the pre- and post-lesson mental models of the teacher-librarians (p.15). Apparently, this realization provided the inspiration for this book (pp. I & 208). Hence, its place of importance in the book's title.