Search (57 results, page 3 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Brown, C.: ¬The evolution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers (2001) 0.00 
    0.004783062 = product of:
  0.009566124 = sum of:
    0.009566124 = product of:
      0.02869837 = sum of:
        0.02869837 = weight(_text_:12 in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02869837 = score(doc=5184,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.21608311 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In one of two bibliometric papers in this issue Brown looks at formal publication and citation of Eprints as shown by the policies and practices of 37 top tier physics journals, and by citation trends in ISI's SciSearch database and Journal Citation Reports. Citation analysis was carried out if Eprint cites were indicated by editor response, instruction to authors sections, reports in the literature, or actual examination of citation lists. Total contribution to 12 archives and their citation counts in the journals were compiled. Of the 13 editors surveyed that responded, 8 published papers that had appeared in the archive. Two of these required removal from the archive at publication; two of the 13 did not publish papers that have appeared as Eprints. A review journal that solicits its contributions allowed citation of Eprints. Seven allowed citations to Eprints, but were less than enthusiastic.Nearly 36,000 citations were made to the 12 archives. Citations to the 37 journals and their impact factors remain constant over the period of 1991 to 1998. Eprint citations appear to peak about 3 years after appearance as do citations to published papers. Contribution to the archives, and their use as measured by citation, is clearly growing. Citation form and publishing policy varies from journal to journal.
  2. Magri, M.; Solari, A.: ¬The SCI Journal Citation Reports : a potential tool for studying journals? (1996) 0.00 
    0.0047349897 = product of:
  0.009469979 = sum of:
    0.009469979 = product of:
      0.028409937 = sum of:
        0.028409937 = weight(_text_:12 in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028409937 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.1996 12:59:31
  3. Wagner-Döbler, R.: ¬Die Nutzung von Zitationsindizes durch deutsche Soziologen : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage (2001) 0.00 
    0.0047349897 = product of:
  0.009469979 = sum of:
    0.009469979 = product of:
      0.028409937 = sum of:
        0.028409937 = weight(_text_:12 in 6831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028409937 = score(doc=6831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 6831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6831)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 8.2010 12:39:58
  4. Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002) 0.00 
    0.0047349897 = product of:
  0.009469979 = sum of:
    0.009469979 = product of:
      0.028409937 = sum of:
        0.028409937 = weight(_text_:12 in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028409937 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.12, S.987-994
  5. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: ¬The mismeasure of science : citation analysis (2018) 0.00 
    0.0047349897 = product of:
  0.009469979 = sum of:
    0.009469979 = product of:
      0.028409937 = sum of:
        0.028409937 = weight(_text_:12 in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028409937 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 2.2018 20:47:54
  6. Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006) 0.00 
    0.0043372 = product of:
  0.0086744 = sum of:
    0.0086744 = product of:
      0.026023198 = sum of:
        0.026023198 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026023198 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 6.2006 17:22:15
  7. Meho, L.I.; Sonnenwald, D.H.: Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance : a case study of Kurdish scholarship (2000) 0.00 
    0.0040585627 = product of:
  0.008117125 = sum of:
    0.008117125 = product of:
      0.024351375 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=4382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 1.2000 12:31:26
  8. Aguillo, I.F.; Granadino, B.; Ortega, J.L.; Prieto, J.A.: Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators (2006) 0.00 
    0.0040585627 = product of:
  0.008117125 = sum of:
    0.008117125 = product of:
      0.024351375 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 5898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=5898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 5898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5898)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    18. 8.2006 12:28:13
  9. Garfield, E.: Citation indexing : its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (1979) 0.00 
    0.0040585627 = product of:
  0.008117125 = sum of:
    0.008117125 = product of:
      0.024351375 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    29. 5.2007 12:50:08
  10. Bensman, S.J.: Distributional differences of the impact factor in the sciences versus the social sciences : an analysis of the probabilistic structure of the 2005 journal citation reports (2008) 0.00 
    0.0040585627 = product of:
  0.008117125 = sum of:
    0.008117125 = product of:
      0.024351375 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 7.2008 17:40:00
  11. Araújo, P.C. de; Gutierres Castanha, R.C.; Hjoerland, B.: Citation indexing and indexes (2021) 0.00 
    0.0040585627 = product of:
  0.008117125 = sum of:
    0.008117125 = product of:
      0.024351375 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 4.2021 12:51:33
  12. Hyland, K.: Self-citation and self-reference : credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003) 0.00 
    0.0033821356 = product of:
  0.0067642713 = sum of:
    0.0067642713 = product of:
      0.020292813 = sum of:
        0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020292813 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Hyland examines self referencing practices by analyzing their textual uses in 240 randomly chosen research papers and 800 abstracts across 80 expert selected journals from 1997 and 1998 in eight disciplines, as a key to their author's assumptions as to their own role in the research process and to the practices of their disciplines. Scanned texts produced a corpus of nearly 1.5 million words which was searched using WordPilot for first person pronouns and all mentions of an author's previous work. There were 6,689 instances of self reference in the papers and 459 in the abstracts; on the average 28 cases per paper, 17% of which were self citations. There was one self mention in every two abstracts. Nearly 70% of self reference and mention occurred in humanities and social science papers, but biologists employed the most self citation overall and 12% of hard science citations were found to be self citations. Interviews indicated that self citation was deemed important in establishing authority by fitting oneself into the research framework. Self mention arises in four main contexts: stating the goal or the structure of the paper, explaining a procedure, stating results or a claim, and elaborating an argument.
  13. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.0033821356 = product of:
  0.0067642713 = sum of:
    0.0067642713 = product of:
      0.020292813 = sum of:
        0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020292813 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 5.2007 17:19:12
  14. Wilson, C.S.; Tenopir, C.: Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns : using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection (2008) 0.00 
    0.0033821356 = product of:
  0.0067642713 = sum of:
    0.0067642713 = product of:
      0.020292813 = sum of:
        0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020292813 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 7.2008 17:57:21
  15. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010) 0.00 
    0.0033821356 = product of:
  0.0067642713 = sum of:
    0.0067642713 = product of:
      0.020292813 = sum of:
        0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020292813 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    28. 9.2010 12:50:25
  16. Robinson-García, N.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.; Torres-Salinas, D.: Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index : a study of backup strategies of end users (2016) 0.00 
    0.0033821356 = product of:
  0.0067642713 = sum of:
    0.0067642713 = product of:
      0.020292813 = sum of:
        0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020292813 = score(doc=3225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.12, S.2964-2975
  17. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008) 0.00 
    0.0027057086 = product of:
  0.005411417 = sum of:
    0.005411417 = product of:
      0.01623425 = sum of:
        0.01623425 = weight(_text_:12 in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01623425 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.12223507 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Erratum Re: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Agewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(2008) no.12, S.2037-2038.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 47
  • d 10

Types

  • a 56
  • el 5
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications