Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Multilinguale Probleme"
  • × theme_ss:"Beziehungen verbale / systematische Erschließung"
  1. Frâncu, V.: Harmonizing a universal classification system with an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus : advantages and limitations (2000) 0.03
    0.030185228 = product of:
      0.060370456 = sum of:
        0.060370456 = product of:
          0.18111137 = sum of:
            0.18111137 = weight(_text_:abridged in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18111137 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39676937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.45646507 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.2629 = idf(docFreq=30, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The case under consideration is a project of building an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus (Romanian-English-French) starting from a list of indexing terms based on an abridged version of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The resulting thesaurus is intended for public libraries for both indexing and searching purposes in bibliographic databases covering a wide range of topics but with a fairly low level of specificity. The problems encountered in such an approach fall into two groups: 1) concordance or compatibility problems in terms of the indexing languages considered (between a classification system and a thesaurus); 2) equivalence and, hence, translatability problems in terms of the natural languages involved. Additionally, the question of ambiguity given the co-occurrence of terms in more than one class, will be discussed with reference to homographs and polysemantic words. In a thesaurus with such a wide coverage yet with a low specificity level, the method adopted in the thesaurus construction was to provide as many lead-in terms as possible and post them up to the closest in meaning broader term in order to improve the recall ratio
  2. Woldering, B.: Connecting with users : Europe and multilinguality (2006) 0.01
    0.005411417 = product of:
      0.010822834 = sum of:
        0.010822834 = product of:
          0.0324685 = sum of:
            0.0324685 = weight(_text_:12 in 5032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0324685 = score(doc=5032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 5032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5032)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:10:12
  3. Francu, V.: ¬The impact of specificity on the retrieval power of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus (2003) 0.00
    0.0040585627 = product of:
      0.008117125 = sum of:
        0.008117125 = product of:
          0.024351375 = sum of:
            0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 5518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024351375 = score(doc=5518,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 5518, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5518)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 6.2001 12:25:05
  4. Balikova, M.: Multilingual Subject Access to Catalogues of National Libraries (MSAC) : Czech Republic's collaboration with Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia, Lithuania and Latvia (2005) 0.00
    0.0027057086 = product of:
      0.005411417 = sum of:
        0.005411417 = product of:
          0.01623425 = sum of:
            0.01623425 = weight(_text_:12 in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01623425 = score(doc=4349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.048018172 = queryNorm
                0.12223507 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    12 S

Types