Search (103 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.05 
    0.049300354 = product of:
  0.09860071 = sum of:
    0.09860071 = product of:
      0.14790106 = sum of:
        0.056819875 = weight(_text_:12 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056819875 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.42782274 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
        0.09108119 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09108119 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  2. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.03 
    0.028171634 = product of:
  0.05634327 = sum of:
    0.05634327 = product of:
      0.0845149 = sum of:
        0.0324685 = weight(_text_:12 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0324685 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
        0.052046396 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052046396 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  3. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.03 
    0.028171634 = product of:
  0.05634327 = sum of:
    0.05634327 = product of:
      0.0845149 = sum of:
        0.0324685 = weight(_text_:12 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0324685 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
        0.052046396 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052046396 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
    Date
    20. 3.2002 12:14:54
  4. Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995) 0.02 
    0.021128725 = product of:
  0.04225745 = sum of:
    0.04225745 = product of:
      0.06338617 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
        0.039034795 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039034795 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
  5. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.02 
    0.021128725 = product of:
  0.04225745 = sum of:
    0.04225745 = product of:
      0.06338617 = sum of:
        0.024351375 = weight(_text_:12 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024351375 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
        0.039034795 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039034795 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel wird ein Eyetracking-Experiment beschrieben, bei dem untersucht wurde, wann und auf Basis welcher Informationen Relevanzentscheidungen bei der themenbezogenen Dokumentenbewertung fallen und welche Faktoren auf die Relevanzentscheidung einwirken. Nach einer kurzen Einführung werden relevante Studien aufgeführt, in denen Eyetracking als Untersuchungsmethode für Interaktionsverhalten mit Ergebnislisten (Information Seeking Behavior) verwendet wurde. Nutzerverhalten wird hierbei vor allem durch unterschiedliche Aufgaben-Typen, dargestellte Informationen und durch das Ranking eines Ergebnisses beeinflusst. Durch EyetrackingUntersuchungen lassen sich Nutzer außerdem in verschiedene Klassen von Bewertungs- und Lesetypen einordnen. Diese Informationen können als implizites Feedback genutzt werden, um so die Suche zu personalisieren und um die Relevanz von Suchergebnissen ohne aktives Zutun des Users zu erhöhen. In einem explorativen Eyetracking-Experiment mit 12 Studenten der Hochschule Darmstadt werden anhand der Länge der Gesamtbewertung, Anzahl der Fixationen, Anzahl der besuchten Metadatenelemente und Länge des Scanpfades zwei typische Bewertungstypen identifiziert. Das Metadatenfeld Abstract wird im Experiment zuverlässig als wichtigste Dokumenteigenschaft für die Zuordnung von Relevanz ermittelt.
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54
  6. Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011) 0.02 
    0.01760727 = product of:
  0.03521454 = sum of:
    0.03521454 = product of:
      0.052821808 = sum of:
        0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020292813 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
        0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032528996 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:29:22
  7. Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015) 0.02 
    0.01760727 = product of:
  0.03521454 = sum of:
    0.03521454 = product of:
      0.052821808 = sum of:
        0.020292813 = weight(_text_:12 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020292813 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
        0.032528996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032528996 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2014-0171.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  8. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02 
    0.0151801985 = product of:
  0.030360397 = sum of:
    0.030360397 = product of:
      0.09108119 = sum of:
        0.09108119 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09108119 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  9. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02 
    0.0151801985 = product of:
  0.030360397 = sum of:
    0.030360397 = product of:
      0.09108119 = sum of:
        0.09108119 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09108119 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  10. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02 
    0.0151801985 = product of:
  0.030360397 = sum of:
    0.030360397 = product of:
      0.09108119 = sum of:
        0.09108119 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09108119 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  11. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01 
    0.010842999 = product of:
  0.021685999 = sum of:
    0.021685999 = product of:
      0.06505799 = sum of:
        0.06505799 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06505799 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  12. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.01 
    0.010842999 = product of:
  0.021685999 = sum of:
    0.021685999 = product of:
      0.06505799 = sum of:
        0.06505799 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06505799 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  13. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.01 
    0.010842999 = product of:
  0.021685999 = sum of:
    0.021685999 = product of:
      0.06505799 = sum of:
        0.06505799 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06505799 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.22-25
  14. Regazzi, J.J.: Evaluating indexing systems : a review after Cranfield (1980) 0.01 
    0.010822834 = product of:
  0.021645669 = sum of:
    0.021645669 = product of:
      0.064937 = sum of:
        0.064937 = weight(_text_:12 in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064937 = score(doc=1849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.48894027 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Indexer. 12(1980) no.1, S.15-20
  15. Cooper, W.S.: ¬The paradoxal role of unexamined documents in the evaluation of retrieval effectiveness (1976) 0.01 
    0.010822834 = product of:
  0.021645669 = sum of:
    0.021645669 = product of:
      0.064937 = sum of:
        0.064937 = weight(_text_:12 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064937 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.48894027 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 12(1976), S.367-375
  16. Donkersloot, H.B.: Zoeken op titelwoorden : een oderzoek met de on-line publiekscatalogus (1985) 0.01 
    0.010822834 = product of:
  0.021645669 = sum of:
    0.021645669 = product of:
      0.064937 = sum of:
        0.064937 = weight(_text_:12 in 6204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064937 = score(doc=6204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.48894027 = fieldWeight in 6204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6204)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Open. 17(1985), no.12, S.542-546
  17. Krause, J.; Mutschke, P.: Indexierung und Fulcrum-Evaluierung (1999) 0.01 
    0.009469979 = product of:
  0.018939959 = sum of:
    0.018939959 = product of:
      0.056819875 = sum of:
        0.056819875 = weight(_text_:12 in 6256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056819875 = score(doc=6256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.42782274 = fieldWeight in 6256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6256)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2001 12:03:42
  18. Oberhauser, O.; Labner, J.: Einführung der automatischen Indexierung im Österreichischen Verbundkatalog? : Bericht über eine empirische Studie (2003) 0.01 
    0.009469979 = product of:
  0.018939959 = sum of:
    0.018939959 = product of:
      0.056819875 = sum of:
        0.056819875 = weight(_text_:12 in 1878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056819875 = score(doc=1878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.42782274 = fieldWeight in 1878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1878)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    20.10.2003 12:07:36
  19. Järvelin, K.: Evaluation (2011) 0.01 
    0.009469979 = product of:
  0.018939959 = sum of:
    0.018939959 = product of:
      0.056819875 = sum of:
        0.056819875 = weight(_text_:12 in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056819875 = score(doc=548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13281173 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.42782274 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 1.2013 19:34:12
  20. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01 
    0.0086744 = product of:
  0.0173488 = sum of:
    0.0173488 = product of:
      0.052046396 = sum of:
        0.052046396 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052046396 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16815145 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048018172 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 81
  • d 18
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 93
  • m 5
  • s 4
  • el 3
  • r 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications