Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Keller, A.: Einstellung zur (automatischen) Sacherschließung in deutsch- und englischsprachigen Ländern (2015) 0.05
    0.054648694 = product of:
      0.10929739 = sum of:
        0.10929739 = product of:
          0.21859477 = sum of:
            0.21859477 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21859477 = score(doc=2571,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2971175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.73571825 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Angesichts der Tatsache, dass die Sacherschließung in deutsch- und englischsprachigen Bibliotheken von verschiedenen Personalgruppen (Fachreferenten bzw. Katalogisierern) geleistet wird, geht die Umfrage der Frage nach, ob unterschiedliche Einstellungen gegenüber der inhaltlichen Erschließung im Allgemeinen und der automatischen Sacherschließung im Besonderen zu erkennen sind. Die Umfrage zeigt eine große Ähnlichkeit zwischen den zwei Sprachregionen: Befragte sind überzeugt vom Nutzen der Sacherschließung und möchten das gegenwärtige Qualitätsniveau aufrechterhalten, gegenüber der automatischen Sacherschließung sind sie hingegen skeptisch eingestellt. Der Beitrag präsentiert und diskutiert die Resultate der Umfrage.
  2. Wiesenmüller, H.: DNB-Sacherschließung : Neues für die Reihen A und B (2019) 0.03
    0.028981846 = product of:
      0.05796369 = sum of:
        0.05796369 = product of:
          0.11592738 = sum of:
            0.11592738 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 5212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11592738 = score(doc=5212,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2971175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.39017352 = fieldWeight in 5212, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5212)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    DDC Deutsch
  3. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.03
    0.027357837 = product of:
      0.054715674 = sum of:
        0.054715674 = product of:
          0.10943135 = sum of:
            0.10943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10943135 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  4. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02
    0.023938108 = product of:
      0.047876216 = sum of:
        0.047876216 = product of:
          0.09575243 = sum of:
            0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09575243 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  5. Hlava, M.M.K.: Automatic indexing : comparing rule-based and statistics-based indexing systems (2005) 0.02
    0.023938108 = product of:
      0.047876216 = sum of:
        0.047876216 = product of:
          0.09575243 = sum of:
            0.09575243 = weight(_text_:22 in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09575243 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information outlook. 9(2005) no.8, S.22-23
  6. Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.020518377 = product of:
      0.041036755 = sum of:
        0.041036755 = product of:
          0.08207351 = sum of:
            0.08207351 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08207351 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:44
  7. Hauer, M.: Automatische Indexierung (2000) 0.02
    0.020518377 = product of:
      0.041036755 = sum of:
        0.041036755 = product of:
          0.08207351 = sum of:
            0.08207351 = weight(_text_:22 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08207351 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissen in Aktion: Wege des Knowledge Managements. 22. Online-Tagung der DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 2.-4.5.2000. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
  8. Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986) 0.02
    0.020518377 = product of:
      0.041036755 = sum of:
        0.041036755 = product of:
          0.08207351 = sum of:
            0.08207351 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08207351 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 6.2015 22:12:56
  9. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.02
    0.020518377 = product of:
      0.041036755 = sum of:
        0.041036755 = product of:
          0.08207351 = sum of:
            0.08207351 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08207351 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  10. Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988) 0.02
    0.017098648 = product of:
      0.034197297 = sum of:
        0.034197297 = product of:
          0.068394594 = sum of:
            0.068394594 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068394594 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 8.1998 12:51:22
  11. Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998) 0.02
    0.017098648 = product of:
      0.034197297 = sum of:
        0.034197297 = product of:
          0.068394594 = sum of:
            0.068394594 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068394594 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  12. Tsareva, P.V.: Algoritmy dlya raspoznavaniya pozitivnykh i negativnykh vkhozdenii deskriptorov v tekst i protsedura avtomaticheskoi klassifikatsii tekstov (1999) 0.02
    0.017098648 = product of:
      0.034197297 = sum of:
        0.034197297 = product of:
          0.068394594 = sum of:
            0.068394594 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068394594 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 4.2002 10:22:41
  13. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.02
    0.017098648 = product of:
      0.034197297 = sum of:
        0.034197297 = product of:
          0.068394594 = sum of:
            0.068394594 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068394594 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  14. Lepsky, K.: Automatische Indexierung des Reallexikons zur Deutschen Kunstgeschichte (2006) 0.02
    0.016906077 = product of:
      0.033812154 = sum of:
        0.033812154 = product of:
          0.06762431 = sum of:
            0.06762431 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 6080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06762431 = score(doc=6080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2971175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.22760123 = fieldWeight in 6080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Digitalisierungsvorhaben sorgen für eine immer größere Verfügbarkeit von Inhalten bislang ausschließlich gedruckt vorliegender Werke, zunehmend auch von ganzen Büchern. Projekte wie "Google Print" versprechen die völlige elektronische Verfügbarkeit von Informationen nahezu unabhängig von Zeit und Ort und sorgen dafür, dass die Hüter der konventionellen Information, die Bibliotheken, in Angst und Schrecken versetzt werden angesichts des befürchteten Verlusts ihrer traditionellen Rolle. Die Debatte kreist dabei eher selten um die Frage, welcher Nutzen sich konkret aus dem elektronischen Volltext ergibt: Der Nutzen steht schlichtweg außer Frage, Volltexte gelten prinzipiell als nützlich. Das ist insofern zu optimistisch, als die reine Verfügbarkeit von Information noch lange nicht fir deren sinnvolle Verwertung sorgt - die bloße Verfügbarkeit des Volltexts von Kants "Kritik der reinen Vernunft" enthebt nicht der Notwendigkeit, das Werk zu lesen und verstehen zu wollen. Lesen wird man besser auch nicht am Bildschirm sondern in der (neu-deutsch) "PrintAusgabe". Elektronische Volltexte von Büchern dienen nicht der Lektüre. Falls ihr Sinn nicht ohnehin ein rein verkaufsfördernder ist (das "Publishers Program" von Google Print erweckt in der Tat diesen Eindruck), bleibt ihr potenzieller Nutzen als Nachschlageinstrument. Nur der Volltext bietet die Möglichkeit, Informationen in einem Werk zu finden, die nicht explizit erschlossen wurden, durch ein Inhaltsverzeichnis etwa oder, eine noch günstigere Ausgangslage, durch ein Sachregister. Allerdings sind die meisten Werke nicht für einen solchen Zweck verfasst worden, d.h. es ist nicht zu erwarten, dass ein Werk über die "Geschichte des Römischen Reiches" im Volltextzugriff zu einem Lexikon zur Geschichte des Römischen Reiches wird. Entspricht also die hinter Google Print und zahllosen anderen Digitalisierungsinitiativen stehende Auffassung einem doch sehr naiven Bild von der Nützlichkeit gedruckter Information?
  15. Tsujii, J.-I.: Automatic acquisition of semantic collocation from corpora (1995) 0.01
    0.013678919 = product of:
      0.027357837 = sum of:
        0.027357837 = product of:
          0.054715674 = sum of:
            0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054715674 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  16. Riloff, E.: ¬An empirical study of automated dictionary construction for information extraction in three domains (1996) 0.01
    0.013678919 = product of:
      0.027357837 = sum of:
        0.027357837 = product of:
          0.054715674 = sum of:
            0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 6752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054715674 = score(doc=6752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  17. Lepsky, K.; Vorhauer, J.: Lingo - ein open source System für die Automatische Indexierung deutschsprachiger Dokumente (2006) 0.01
    0.013678919 = product of:
      0.027357837 = sum of:
        0.027357837 = product of:
          0.054715674 = sum of:
            0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054715674 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 3.2006 12:22:02
  18. Probst, M.; Mittelbach, J.: Maschinelle Indexierung in der Sacherschließung wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken (2006) 0.01
    0.013678919 = product of:
      0.027357837 = sum of:
        0.027357837 = product of:
          0.054715674 = sum of:
            0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054715674 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:35:19
  19. Glaesener, L.: Automatisches Indexieren einer informationswissenschaftlichen Datenbank mit Mehrwortgruppen (2012) 0.01
    0.013678919 = product of:
      0.027357837 = sum of:
        0.027357837 = product of:
          0.054715674 = sum of:
            0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054715674 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2012 19:43:22
  20. Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983) 0.01
    0.011969054 = product of:
      0.023938108 = sum of:
        0.023938108 = product of:
          0.047876216 = sum of:
            0.047876216 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047876216 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050480857 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 3.1996 13:22:21