Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Verteilte bibliographische Datenbanken"
  1. Milanesi, C.: Möglichkeiten der Kooperation im Rahmen von Subject Gateways : das Euler-Projekt im Vergleich mit weiteren europäischen Projekten (2001) 0.02 
    0.020518377 = product of:
  0.041036755 = sum of:
    0.041036755 = product of:
      0.08207351 = sum of:
        0.08207351 = weight(_text_:22 in 4865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08207351 = score(doc=4865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:59
  2. Jahns, Y.; Trummer, M.: Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung nach Maß : Kann Heterogenität beherrscht werden? (2004) 0.02 
    0.016732678 = product of:
  0.033465356 = sum of:
    0.033465356 = product of:
      0.06693071 = sum of:
        0.06693071 = weight(_text_:deutsch in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06693071 = score(doc=2789,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2971175 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.2252668 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.885746 = idf(docFreq=333, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Neben die Pflege der Standards tritt als Herausforderung die Vernetzung der Systeme, um heterogene Dokumentenbestände zu verbinden. »Standardisierung muss von der verbleibenden Heterogenität her gedacht werden«." Diese Aufgaben können nur in Kooperation von Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen gelöst werden. Die vorgestellten Projekte zeigen, wie dies gelingen kann. Sie verfolgen alle das Ziel, Informationen über Inhalte schneller und besser für die Nutzer zur Verfügung zu stellen. Fachliche Recherchen über mehrere Informationsanbieter werden durch die Heterogenität überwindende Suchdienste ermöglicht. Die Einführung der DDC im deutschen Sprachraum steht genau im Kern des Spannungsfeldes. Die DDC stellt durch ihren universalen Charakter nicht nur einen übergreifenden Standard her. Ihre Anwendung ist nur nutzbringend, wenn zugleich die Vernetzung mit den in Deutschland bewährten Klassifikationen und Thesauri erfolgt. Ziel des Projektes DDC Deutsch ist nicht nur eine Übersetzung ins Deutsche, die DDC soll auch in Form elektronischer Dienste zur Verfügung gestellt werden. Dr. Lars Svensson, Deutsche Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main, präsentierte anschaulichdie Möglichkeiten einer intelligenten Navigation über die DDC. Für die Dokumentenbestände Der Deutschen Bibliothek, des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes (GBV) und der Niedersächsischen Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen wurde prototypisch ein Webservice realisiert.
    Katja Heyke, Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln, und Manfred Faden, Bibliothek des HWWA-Instituts für Wirtschaftsforschung Hamburg, stellten ähnliche Entwicklungen für den Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften vor. Hier wird eine Crosskonkordanz zwischen dem Standard Thesaurus Wirtschaft (STW) und dem Bereich Wirtschaft der SWD aufgebaut." Diese Datenbank soll den Zugriff auf die mit STW und SWD erschlossenen Bestände ermöglichen. Sie wird dazu weitergegeben an die virtuelle Fachbibliothek EconBiz und an den Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbund. Die Crosskonkordanz Wirtschaft bietet aber auch die Chance zur kooperativen Sacherschließung, denn sie eröffnet die Möglichkeit der gegenseitigen Übernahme von Sacherschließungsdaten zwischen den Partnern Die Deutsche Bibliothek, Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln, HWWA und Bibliothek des Instituts für Weltwirtschaft Kiel. Am Beispiel der Wirtschaftswissenschaften zeigt sich der Gewinn solcher KonkordanzProjekte für Indexierer und Benutzer. Der Austausch über die Erschließungsregeln und die systematische Analyse der Normdaten führen zur Bereinigung von fachlichen Schwachstellen und Inkonsistenzen in den Systemen. Die Thesauri werden insgesamt verbessert und sogar angenähert. Die Vortragsreihe schloss mit einem Projekt, das die Heterogenität der Daten aus dem Blickwinkel der Mehrsprachigkeit betrachtet. Martin Kunz, Deutsche Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main, informierte über das Projekt MACS (Multilingual Access to Subject Headings). MACS bietet einen mehrsprachigen Zugriff auf Bibliothekskataloge. Dazu wurde eine Verbindung zwischen den Schlagwortnormdateien LCSH, RAMEAU und SWD erarbeitet. Äquivalente Vorzugsbezeichnungen der Normdateien werden intellektuell nachgewiesen und als Link abgelegt. Das Projekt beschränkte sich zunächst auf die Bereiche Sport und Theater und widmet sich in einer nächsten Stufe den am häufigsten verwendeten Schlagwörtern. MACS geht davon aus, dass ein Benutzer in der Sprache seiner Wahl (Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch) eine Schlagwortsuche startet, und ermöglicht ihm, seine Suche auf die affilierten Datenbanken im Ausland auszudehnen. Martin Kunz plädierte für einen Integrationsansatz, der auf dem gegenseitigen Respekt vor der Terminologie der kooperierenden Partner beruht. Er sprach sich dafür aus, in solchen Vorhaben den Begriff der Thesaurus föderation anzuwenden, der die Autonomie der Thesauri unterstreicht.
    Object
    DDC Deutsch
  3. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.01 
    0.013678919 = product of:
  0.027357837 = sum of:
    0.027357837 = product of:
      0.054715674 = sum of:
        0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054715674 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  4. Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996) 0.01 
    0.013678919 = product of:
  0.027357837 = sum of:
    0.027357837 = product of:
      0.054715674 = sum of:
        0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054715674 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
  5. Ashton, J.: ONE: the final OPAC frontier (1998) 0.01 
    0.013678919 = product of:
  0.027357837 = sum of:
    0.027357837 = product of:
      0.054715674 = sum of:
        0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054715674 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Select newsletter. 1998, no.22, Spring, S.5-6
  6. Lunau, C.D.: Z39.50: a critical component of the Canadian resource sharing infrastructure : implementation activities and results achieved (1997) 0.01 
    0.013678919 = product of:
  0.027357837 = sum of:
    0.027357837 = product of:
      0.054715674 = sum of:
        0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054715674 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 3.1999 17:22:57
  7. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.01 
    0.013678919 = product of:
  0.027357837 = sum of:
    0.027357837 = product of:
      0.054715674 = sum of:
        0.054715674 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054715674 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
  8. Kaizik, A.; Gödert, W.; Milanesi, C.: Erfahrungen und Ergebnisse aus der Evaluierung des EU-Projektes EULER im Rahmen des an der FH Köln angesiedelten Projektes EJECT (Evaluation von Subject Gateways des World Wide Web (2001) 0.01 
    0.01209057 = product of:
  0.02418114 = sum of:
    0.02418114 = product of:
      0.04836228 = sum of:
        0.04836228 = weight(_text_:22 in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04836228 = score(doc=5801,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:42:22
  9. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.01 
    0.011969054 = product of:
  0.023938108 = sum of:
    0.023938108 = product of:
      0.047876216 = sum of:
        0.047876216 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047876216 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  10. Neuroth, H.; Lepschy, P.: ¬Das EU-Projekt Renardus (2001) 0.01 
    0.010259189 = product of:
  0.020518377 = sum of:
    0.020518377 = product of:
      0.041036755 = sum of:
        0.041036755 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041036755 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:32:15
  11. Avrahami, T.T.; Yau, L.; Si, L.; Callan, J.P.: ¬The FedLemur project : Federated search in the real world (2006) 0.01 
    0.010259189 = product of:
  0.020518377 = sum of:
    0.020518377 = product of:
      0.041036755 = sum of:
        0.041036755 = weight(_text_:22 in 5271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041036755 = score(doc=5271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5271)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:02:07
  12. Meiert, M.: Elektronische Publikationen an Hochschulen : Modellierung des elektronischen Publikationsprozesses am Beispiel der Universität Hildesheim (2006) 0.01 
    0.010259189 = product of:
  0.020518377 = sum of:
    0.020518377 = product of:
      0.041036755 = sum of:
        0.041036755 = weight(_text_:22 in 5974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041036755 = score(doc=5974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5974)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 9.2006 13:22:15
  13. Nicholson, D.; Steele, M.: CATRIONA : a distributed, locally-oriented, Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet (1996) 0.01 
    0.010259189 = product of:
  0.020518377 = sum of:
    0.020518377 = product of:
      0.041036755 = sum of:
        0.041036755 = weight(_text_:22 in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041036755 = score(doc=603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.127-141
  14. Johnson, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval (2000) 0.01 
    0.008549324 = product of:
  0.017098648 = sum of:
    0.017098648 = product of:
      0.034197297 = sum of:
        0.034197297 = weight(_text_:22 in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034197297 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  15. Subject retrieval in a networked environment : Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC (2003) 0.00 
    0.0034197296 = product of:
  0.0068394593 = sum of:
    0.0068394593 = product of:
      0.013678919 = sum of:
        0.013678919 = weight(_text_:22 in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013678919 = score(doc=3964,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17677537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050480857 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.2, S.117-118 (D. Campbell): "This excellent volume offers 22 papers delivered at an IFLA Satellite meeting in Dublin Ohio in 2001. The conference gathered together information and computer scientists to discuss an important and difficult question: in what specific ways can the accumulated skills, theories and traditions of librarianship be mobilized to face the challenges of providing subject access to information in present and future networked information environments? The papers which grapple with this question are organized in a surprisingly deft and coherent way. Many conferences and proceedings have unhappy sessions that contain a hodge-podge of papers that didn't quite fit any other categories. As befits a good classificationist, editor I.C. McIlwaine has kept this problem to a minimum. The papers are organized into eight sessions, which split into two broad categories. The first five sessions deal with subject domains, and the last three deal with subject access tools. The five sessions and thirteen papers that discuss access in different domains appear in order of in creasing intension. The first papers deal with access in multilingual environments, followed by papers an access across multiple vocabularies and across sectors, ending up with studies of domain-specific retrieval (primarily education). Some of the papers offer predictably strong work by scholars engaged in ongoing, long-term research. Gerard Riesthuis offers a clear analysis of the complexities of negotiating non-identical thesauri, particularly in cases where hierarchical structure varies across different languages. Hope Olson and Dennis Ward use Olson's familiar and welcome method of using provocative and unconventional theory to generate meliorative approaches to blas in general subject access schemes. Many papers, an the other hand, deal with specific ongoing projects: Renardus, The High Level Thesaurus Project, The Colorado Digitization Project and The Iter Bibliography for medieval and Renaissance material. Most of these papers display a similar structure: an explanation of the theory and purpose of the project, an account of problems encountered in the implementation, and a discussion of the results, both promising and disappointing, thus far. Of these papers, the account of the Multilanguage Access to Subjects Project in Europe (MACS) deserves special mention. In describing how the project is founded an the principle of the equality of languages, with each subject heading language maintained in its own database, and with no single language used as a pivot for the others, Elisabeth Freyre and Max Naudi offer a particularly vivid example of the way the ethics of librarianship translate into pragmatic contexts and concrete procedures. The three sessions and nine papers devoted to subject access tools split into two kinds: papers that discuss the use of theory and research to generate new tools for a networked environment, and those that discuss the transformation of traditional subject access tools in this environment. In the new tool development area, Mary Burke provides a promising example of the bidirectional approach that is so often necessary: in her case study of user-driven classification of photographs, she user personal construct theory to clarify the practice of classification, while at the same time using practice to test the theory. Carol Bean and Rebecca Green offer an intriguing combination of librarianship and computer science, importing frame representation technique from artificial intelligence to standardize syntagmatic relationships to enhance recall and precision.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes