Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Drabenstott, K.M."
  1. Drabenstott, K.M.: Enhancing a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1994) 0.01
    0.00988663 = product of:
      0.04943315 = sum of:
        0.04943315 = weight(_text_:1 in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04943315 = score(doc=382,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.38382855 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library and information science research 18(1996) no.1, S.87-89 (C.A. Hert), Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
  2. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: End-user understanding of subject headings in library catalogs (1999) 0.01
    0.008523934 = product of:
      0.042619668 = sum of:
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: Testing a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1995) 0.01
    0.008389084 = product of:
      0.041945416 = sum of:
        0.041945416 = weight(_text_:1 in 385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041945416 = score(doc=385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=385)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
  4. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: Do patrons understand Library of Congress Subject Headings? (1999) 0.01
    0.008389084 = product of:
      0.041945416 = sum of:
        0.041945416 = weight(_text_:1 in 6072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041945416 = score(doc=6072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 6072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6072)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Technicalities. 19(1999) no.1, S.6-9
  5. Drabenstott, K.M.; Burman, C.M.: Analytical review of the library of the future (1994) 0.01
    0.006990903 = product of:
      0.034954514 = sum of:
        0.034954514 = weight(_text_:1 in 3658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034954514 = score(doc=3658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 3658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3658)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.1, S.60-61 (C. Oppenheim)
  6. Drabenstott, K.M.: Experiences with online catalogs in the USA using a classification system as a subject searching tool (1990) 0.01
    0.006920641 = product of:
      0.034603205 = sum of:
        0.034603205 = weight(_text_:1 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034603205 = score(doc=4786,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.26867998 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.1
    Source
    Tools for knowledge organization and the human interface. Proceedings of the 1st International ISKO Conference, Darmstadt, 14.-17.8.1990. Pt.1
  7. Drabenstott, K.M.: Web search strategies (2000) 0.01
    0.0056826225 = product of:
      0.028413111 = sum of:
        0.028413111 = weight(_text_:22 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028413111 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  8. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: Testing a new design for subject searching in online catalogs (1994) 0.01
    0.005592722 = product of:
      0.02796361 = sum of:
        0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 7716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02796361 = score(doc=7716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 7716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7716)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 12(1994) no.1, S.67-76,86
  9. Drabenstott, K.M.: Enhancing a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1996) 0.00
    0.004194542 = product of:
      0.020972708 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 5553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=5553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 5553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5553)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 14(1996) no.1, S.87-109
  10. Drabenstott, K.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Using subject headings for online retrieval : theory, practice and potential (1994) 0.00
    0.004194542 = product of:
      0.020972708 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.3, S.450-451 (R.R. Larson); Library resources and technical services 41(1997) no.1, S.60-67 (B.H. Weinberg)
  11. Drabenstott, K.M.: Do nondomain experts enlist the strategies of domain experts? (2003) 0.00
    0.0034954515 = product of:
      0.017477257 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 1713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=1713,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1713, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1713)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    User studies demonstrate that nondomain experts do not use the same information-seeking strategies as domain experts. Because of the transformation of integrated library systems into Information Gateways in the late 1990s, both nondomain experts and domain experts have had available to them the wide range of information-seeking strategies in a single system. This article describes the results of a study to answer three research questions: (1) do nondomain experts enlist the strategies of domain experts? (2) if they do, how did they learn about these strategies? and (3) are they successful using them? Interviews, audio recordings, screen captures, and observations were used to gather data from 14 undergraduate students who searched an academic library's Information Gateway. The few times that the undergraduates in this study enlisted search strategies that were characteristic of domain experts, it usually took perseverance, trial-and-error, serendipity, or a combination of all three for them to find useful information. Although this study's results provide no compelling reasons for systems to support features that make domain-expert strategies possible, there is need for system features that scaffold nondomain experts from their usual strategies to the strategies characteristic of domain experts.