Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Frandsen, T.F."
  1. Frandsen, T.F.; Wouters, P.: Turning working papers into journal articles : an exercise in microbibliometrics (2009) 0.01
    0.008523934 = product of:
      0.042619668 = sum of:
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 2757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=2757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2757)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:59:25
  2. Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The ripple effect : citation chain reactions of a nobel prize (2013) 0.01
    0.008523934 = product of:
      0.042619668 = sum of:
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:21:09
  3. Nebelong-Bonnevie, E.; Frandsen, T.F.: Journal citation identity and journal citation image : a portrait of the Journal of Documentation (2006) 0.00
    0.004943315 = product of:
      0.024716575 = sum of:
        0.024716575 = weight(_text_:1 in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024716575 = score(doc=5586,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2006 11:23:28
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 62(2006) no.1, S.30-57
  4. Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.; Rowlands, I.: Diffusion factors (2006) 0.00
    0.004943315 = product of:
      0.024716575 = sum of:
        0.024716575 = weight(_text_:1 in 5587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024716575 = score(doc=5587,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 5587, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5587)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2006 11:25:10
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 62(2006) no.1, S.58-72
  5. Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: Effects of academic experience and prestige on researchers' citing behavior (2012) 0.00
    0.004893632 = product of:
      0.02446816 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 4962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=4962,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 4962, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4962)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.64-71
  6. Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005) 0.00
    0.004194542 = product of:
      0.020972708 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.1, S.58-62
  7. Frandsen, T.F.: Journal diffusion factors - a measure of diffusion? (2004) 0.00
    0.004194542 = product of:
      0.020972708 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 56(2004) no.1, S.5-11
  8. Frandsen, T.F.: ¬The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system : three science fields (2009) 0.00
    0.004194542 = product of:
      0.020972708 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 4210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=4210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4210)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.1, S.131-141
  9. Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: Citation behavior : a large-scale test of the persuasion by name-dropping hypothesis (2017) 0.00
    0.004194542 = product of:
      0.020972708 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Citation frequencies are commonly interpreted as measures of quality or impact. Yet, the true nature of citations and their proper interpretation have been the center of a long, but still unresolved discussion in Bibliometrics. A comparison of 67,578 pairs of studies on the same healthcare topic, with the same publication age (1-15 years) reveals that when one of the studies is being selected for citation, it has on average received about three times as many citations as the other study. However, the average citation-gap between selected or deselected studies narrows slightly over time, which fits poorly with the name-dropping interpretation and better with the quality and impact-interpretation. The results demonstrate that authors in the field of Healthcare tend to cite highly cited documents when they have a choice. This is more likely caused by differences related to quality than differences related to status of the publications cited.