Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"McIlwaine, I.C."
  1. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2000 (2000) 0.06 
    0.059352882 = product of:
  0.1483822 = sum of:
    0.04893632 = weight(_text_:1 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04893632 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
    0.09944589 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09944589 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    1. 4.2002 12:58:24
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75
  2. McIlwaine, I.C.: Trends in knowledge organization research (2003) 0.01 
    0.011365245 = product of:
  0.056826223 = sum of:
    0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056826223 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 6.2004 19:22:56
  3. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995) 0.01 
    0.009944589 = product of:
  0.049722943 = sum of:
    0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049722943 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.: Brian Vickery : 11th September 1918-17 th October 2009 (2010) 0.01 
    0.007103278 = product of:
  0.03551639 = sum of:
    0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03551639 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:32:06
  5. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDK: der gegenwärtige Zustand und künftige Entwicklungen (1993) 0.01 
    0.006920641 = product of:
  0.034603205 = sum of:
    0.034603205 = weight(_text_:1 in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034603205 = score(doc=398,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.26867998 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Der Vortrag berichtet über die Fertigstellung des maschinenlesbaren Master Reference File der UDK und zeigt, wie er zusammengestellt wurde. Die als Quelle benutzte Ausgaben werden vorgestellt, insbesondere die Internationale Mittlere Ausgabe in Englisch und Französisch, die neuen Abschnitte für Physikalische Chemie und für Sprachen, die in den 'Extensions and corrections to the UDC 14(1992)' veröffentlicht wurden, werden dargestellt und Pläne für die weitere Entwicklung der Systematik auf einer konsequenten facettierten Grundlage entwickelt. Zwei aktuelle Ausgaben, Classification décimale universelle, édition moyenne, Vol.1(1990) und CDU: Classification Decimal Universal, edicion abreviada española (1991) werden besprochen
    Date
    1. 4.2002 13:19:33
  6. McIlwaine, I.C.: Classification schemes : consultation with users and cooperation between editors (1997) 0.01 
    0.0059319776 = product of:
  0.029659888 = sum of:
    0.029659888 = weight(_text_:1 in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029659888 = score(doc=5610,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.23029712 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.2006 14:27:32
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.81-95
  7. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: International trends in subject analysis research (1999) 0.01 
    0.005592722 = product of:
  0.02796361 = sum of:
    0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02796361 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.23-29
  8. McIlwaine, I.C.: Universal Bibliographic Control and the quest for a universally acceptable subject arrangement (2010) 0.01 
    0.005592722 = product of:
  0.02796361 = sum of:
    0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 3567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02796361 = score(doc=3567,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 3567, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3567)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.1, S.36-47
  9. McIlwaine, I.C.; Buxton, A.: Guide to the use of UDC : an introductory guide to the use and application of the Universal Decimal Classification (1993) 0.00 
    0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 4638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=4638,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 4638, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4638)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Library Association Record 96(1994) no.12, S.685 (R. Sweeney); Indexer 19(1995) no.4, S.316-317 (M. Piggott); Library resources and technical services 40(1996) no.1, S.99-101 (S.J. Smith)
  10. McIlwaine, I.C.: Interdisciplinarity : a new retrieval problem? (2000) 0.00 
    0.004194542 = product of:
  0.020972708 = sum of:
    0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020972708 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 1.2002 18:44:15
  11. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997) 0.00 
    0.0034954515 = product of:
  0.017477257 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Contribution to part 1 of a 2 part series on the history of documentation and information science
  12. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : a guide to its use (2000) 0.00 
    0.0034954515 = product of:
  0.017477257 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Isbn
    90-806152-1-8
  13. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A question of place (2004) 0.00 
    0.0034954515 = product of:
  0.017477257 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    1. Introduction The representation of place in classification schemes presents a number of problems. This paper examines some of them and presents different ways in which a solution may be sought. Firstly, what is meant by place? The simple answer is a geographical area, large or small. The reality is not so simple. Place, or Topos to Aristotle was more than just an area, it was a state of mind. But even staying an the less philosophical plane, the way in which a place can be expressed is infinitely variable. Toponymy is a well defined field of study, comparable with taxonomy in the biological sciences. It comprehends the proper name by which any geographical entity is known, and part of the world, feature of earth's surface, organic aggregate (reef, forest) an organizational unit (country, borough, diocese), limits of Earth (poles, hemispheres) parts of Earth (oceans, continents), lakes, mountain passes, capital cities or sea parts.
  14. McIlwaine, I.C.: Where have all the flowers gone? : An investigation into the fate of some special classification schemes (2003) 0.00 
    0.002796361 = product of:
  0.013981805 = sum of:
    0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013981805 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Prior to the OPAC many institutions devised classifications to suit their special needs. Others expanded or altered general schemes to accommodate specific approaches. A driving force in the creation of these classifications was the Classification Research Group, celebrating its golden jubilee in 2002, whose work created a framework and body of principles that remain valid for the retrieval needs of today. The paper highlights some of these special schemes and highlights the fundamental principles which remain valid. 1. Introduction The distinction between a general and a special classification scheme is made frequently in the textbooks, but is one that it is sometimes difficult to draw. The Library of Congress classification could be described as the special classification par excellence. Normally, however, a special classification is taken to be one that is restricted to a specific subject, and quite often used in one specific context only, either a library or a bibliographic listing or for a specific purpose such as a search engine and it is in this sense that I propose to examine some of these schemes. Today, there is a widespread preference for searching an words as a supplement to the use of a standard system, usually the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). This is enhanced by the ability to search documents full-text in a computerized environment, a situation that did not exist 20 or 30 years ago. Today's situation is a great improvement in many ways, but it does depend upon the words used by the author and the searcher corresponding, and often presupposes the use of English. In libraries, the use of co-operative services and precatalogued records already provided with classification data has also spelt the demise of the special scheme. In many instances, the survival of a special classification depends upon its creaior and, with the passage of time, this becomes inevitably more precarious.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 12
  • d 2

Types

Themes