Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Nicholas, D."
  1. Nicholas, D.: Assessing information needs : tools and techniques (1996) 0.04
    0.042394917 = product of:
      0.105987296 = sum of:
        0.034954514 = weight(_text_:1 in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034954514 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.27140775 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
        0.07103278 = weight(_text_:22 in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103278 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 19:22:51
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Assignation. 14(1997) no.2, S.24 (S. Vogel); Journal of librarianship and information science 30(1998) no.1, S.68 (J. Secker)
  2. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Rowlands, I.; Fieldhouse, M.: Student digital information-seeking behaviour in context (2009) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    23. 2.2009 17:22:41
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.1, S.106-132
  3. Williams, P.; Nicholas, D.: Navigating the news net : how news consumers read the electronic version of a daily newspaper (2001) 0.01
    0.008389084 = product of:
      0.041945416 = sum of:
        0.041945416 = weight(_text_:1 in 6141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041945416 = score(doc=6141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 6141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6141)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Libri. 51(2001) no.1, S.8-16
  4. Nicholas, D.: LISA Plus on CD-ROM : version 4 (1997) 0.01
    0.007103278 = product of:
      0.03551639 = sum of:
        0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03551639 = score(doc=228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=228)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  5. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Williams, P.: ¬The characteristics of users and non-users of a kiosk information system (2004) 0.00
    0.004893632 = product of:
      0.02446816 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 56(2004) no.1, S.48-61
  6. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Watkinson, A.: Digital journals, Big Deals and online searching behaviour : a pilot study (2003) 0.00
    0.004893632 = product of:
      0.02446816 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 55(2003) nos.1/2, S.84-109
  7. Monopoli, M.; Nicholas, D.: ¬A user evaluation of Subject Based Information Gateways : case study ADAM (2001) 0.00
    0.004893632 = product of:
      0.02446816 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=696,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 696, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=696)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 53(2001) no.1, S.39-52
  8. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Williams, P.; Dobrowolski, T.: Re-appraising information seeking behaviour in a digital environment : bouncers, checkers, returnees and the like (2004) 0.00
    0.004194542 = product of:
      0.020972708 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 60(2004) no.1, S.24-43
  9. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals : case study OhioLINK (2006) 0.00
    0.0034954515 = product of:
      0.017477257 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=5605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2006 12:10:26
  10. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.: Characterising and evaluating information seeking behaviour in a digital environment : Spotlight on the 'bouncer' (2007) 0.00
    0.0034954515 = product of:
      0.017477257 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=925)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper delineates and explains an emerging, but significant, form of digital information seeking behaviour among information consumers, which the authors have called 'bouncing'. The evidence for this behaviour has emerged from five years of deep log analysis studies - an advanced form of transaction log analysis - of a wide range of users of digital information resources. Much of the evidence and discussion provided comes from the scholarly communication field. Two main bouncing metrics were applied in the log studies: site penetration, which is the number of items or pages viewed in a session, and return visits. The evidence shows that (1) a high proportion of people view just a few items or pages during a visit to a site and, (2) a high proportion of visitors either do not come back to the site or they did so infrequently. Typically those who penetrated a site least tended to return the least frequently. These people are termed 'bouncers'. They bounce into the site and then bounce out again, presumably, to another site, as a high proportion of them do not appear to come back again. Possible explanations - negative and positive, for the form of behaviour are discussed.
  11. Nicholas, D.: ¬An assessment of the online searching behaviour of practitioner end users (1996) 0.00
    0.002796361 = product of:
      0.013981805 = sum of:
        0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 5832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013981805 = score(doc=5832,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 5832, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5832)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The study set out to determine: (1) what were the searching characteristics of end-users in a non-academic environment and explain this in the light of their information needs; (2) whether these characteristics were those that were ascribed to end users in the professional literature; (3) whether they differed materially from those of information professionals working in the same fields. Searching characteristics were interpreted in their widest sense to include: command utilisation/knowledge; search success a satisfaction; volume of searching; searching style / approach; duration of searches; file selection; willingness to delegate and levels of training. These issues were explored in relation to 2 practitioner groups - journalists from he Guardian newspaper, and politicians from The House of Commons. Comparative data were also sought from information professionals in these 2 organisations. A mixture of social and statistical methods was used to monitor end-user and professional searching, though transactional log analysis was strongly featured. Altogether the searching behaviour of 170 end users was evaluated in the light of the searching behaviour of 70 librarians. The principal findings were that: in some respects end users did conform to the picture that information professionals have of them: they did seartch with a limited range of commands; more of their searches produced no results, and search statements were simplly constructed. But in other respects they confounded their image - they could be very quick and economical searchers, and they did not display meters of print-out. However, there were variations between individual end users, and it was often possible to find an end-user group that matched an information professional group on one aspect of online searching or another. The online behaviour of end users was very much related to their general information seeking behaviour; and to the fact that they were not trained
  12. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.: Website usage metrics : a re-assessment of session data (2008) 0.00
    0.002796361 = product of:
      0.013981805 = sum of:
        0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013981805 = score(doc=2040,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.358-372