Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.03

0.033915933 = product of:
  0.084789835 = sum of:
    0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02796361 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
    0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056826223 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Source: Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22

Oppenheim, C.: Intellectual property : legal and other issues (1997) 0.03

0.02543695 = product of:
  0.063592374 = sum of:
    0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020972708 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
    0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042619668 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Source: Information studies. 3(1997) no.1, S.5-22

Oppenheim, C.: ¬An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK (1996) 0.01

0.011365245 = product of:
  0.056826223 = sum of:
    0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056826223 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.407-421

Harry, V.; Oppenheim, C.: Evaluation of electronic databases : pt.2: testing CD-ROM products (1993) 0.01
```
0.00968688 = product of:
  0.0484344 = sum of:
    0.0484344 = weight(_text_:1 in 7430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0484344 = score(doc=7430,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.37607366 = fieldWeight in 7430, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7430)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Describes some evaluations which were carried out using the criteria discussed in pt.1 and set out on standard test forms. The purpose of the criteria was to assess the validity of the criteria and the test forms. Products were chosen from 4 suppliers: 2 major CD-ROM producers; SilverPlatter and W.H. Wilson; and 2 smaller suppliers: CMC ReSearch and Chadwyck-Healey

Footnote

Pt.1 in: 17(1993) no.4, S.211-222. - Vgl. auch: Rowley u. Slack in: Online and CD-ROM review 21(1997) no.1

Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.01

0.008523934 = product of:
  0.042619668 = sum of:
    0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042619668 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 8. 7.2010 19:22:45

Oppenheim, C.: ¬The virtual library : some common sense please (1994) 0.01

0.007909304 = product of:
  0.03954652 = sum of:
    0.03954652 = weight(_text_:1 in 8289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03954652 = score(doc=8289,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.30706283 = fieldWeight in 8289, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8289)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Managing information. 1(1994) no.1, S.26-27

Harry, V.; Oppenheim, C.: Evaluation of electronic databases : pt.1: criteria for testing CD-ROM products (1993) 0.01

0.007909304 = product of:
  0.03954652 = sum of:
    0.03954652 = weight(_text_:1 in 7429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03954652 = score(doc=7429,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.30706283 = fieldWeight in 7429, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7429)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote: Vgl. auch: Rowley u. Slack in: Online and CD-ROM review 21(1997) no.1

Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.01

0.007103278 = product of:
  0.03551639 = sum of:
    0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03551639 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 8. 1.2011 19:22:13

Oppenheim, C.: Document delivery and electronic copyright : what is copyright? (1995) 0.01

0.005592722 = product of:
  0.02796361 = sum of:
    0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02796361 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Information management report. 1995, March, S.1-6

Oppenheim, C.: Do citations count? : Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) (1996) 0.01

0.005592722 = product of:
  0.02796361 = sum of:
    0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02796361 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 1. 3.1997 19:00:15

Baird, L.M.; Oppenheim, C.: Do citations matter? (1994) 0.00

0.004194542 = product of:
  0.020972708 = sum of:
    0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020972708 = score(doc=6896,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.1, S.2-15

Oppenheim, C.: Managers' use and handling of information (1997) 0.00

0.004194542 = product of:
  0.020972708 = sum of:
    0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020972708 = score(doc=357,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 357, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=357)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 1. 3.1997 8:44:18

Cross, C.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬A genre analysis of scientific abstracts (2006) 0.00
```
0.003954652 = product of:
  0.01977326 = sum of:
    0.01977326 = weight(_text_:1 in 5603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01977326 = score(doc=5603,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.15353142 = fieldWeight in 5603, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5603)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to analyse the structure of a small number of abstracts that have appeared in the CABI database over a number of years, during which time the authorship of the abstracts changed from CABI editorial staff to journal article authors themselves. This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology in an effort to discover whether these abstracts followed generally agreed abstracting guidelines. Design/methodology/approach - The method adopted was a move analysis of the text of the abstracts. This move analysis revealed a five-move pattern: move 1 situates the research within the scientific community; move 2 introduces the research by either describing the main features of the research or presenting its purpose; move 3 describes the methodology; move 4 states the results; and move 5 draws conclusions or suggests practical applications. Findings - Thematic analysis shows that scientific abstract authors thematise their subject by referring to the discourse domain or the "real" world. Not all of the abstracts succeeded in following the guideline advice. However, there was general consistency regarding semantic organisation and thematic structure. Research limitations/implications - The research limitations were the small number of abstracts examined, from just one subject domain. Practical limitations - The practical implications are the need for abstracting services to be clearer and more prescriptive regarding how they want abstracts to be structured as the lack of formal training in abstract writing increases the risk of subjectivity and verbosity and reduces clarity in scientific abstracts. Another implication of the research are that abstracting and indexing services must ensure that they maintain abstract quality if they introduce policies of accepting author abstracts. This is important as there is probably little formal training in abstract writing for science students at present. Recommendations for further research are made. Originality/value - This paper reports a study of the semantic organisation and thematic structure of 12 abstracts from the field of protozoology.

Date

1. 8.2006 12:00:26

Eager, C.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬An observational method for undertaking user needs studies (1996) 0.00

0.0034954515 = product of:
  0.017477257 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=3671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.1, S.15-24

Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes