Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zumer, M."
  1. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.03 
    0.03249841 = product of:
  0.081246026 = sum of:
    0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020972708 = score(doc=1967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.060273316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060273316 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Date
    1. 7.2012 14:03:46
  2. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.03 
    0.027082006 = product of:
  0.06770501 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=1962,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
    0.050227758 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050227758 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.90-101
  3. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007) 0.02 
    0.017047867 = product of:
  0.085239336 = sum of:
    0.085239336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085239336 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  4. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.01 
    0.009944589 = product of:
  0.049722943 = sum of:
    0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049722943 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1.11.2005 18:56:22
  5. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.01 
    0.008523934 = product of:
  0.042619668 = sum of:
    0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042619668 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
  6. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.01 
    0.008523934 = product of:
  0.042619668 = sum of:
    0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042619668 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  7. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.01 
    0.008523934 = product of:
  0.042619668 = sum of:
    0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042619668 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Liibrary : resuls & findings (2008) 0.01 
    0.005592722 = product of:
  0.02796361 = sum of:
    0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02796361 = score(doc=858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=858)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vortrag "One more step towards the European digital library: International Conference, Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, Frankfurt am Main 31 January - 1 February 2008.
  9. Zumer, M.: FRSAD: challenges of modeling the aboutness (2011) 0.00 
    0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 4787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=4787,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 4787, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4787)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Series
    Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1
  10. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.; Salaba, A.: FRSAD: conceptual modeling of aboutness (2012) 0.00 
    0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Isbn
    978-1-59884-794-9
  11. Aalberg, T.; O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.: Extending the LRM Model to integrating resources (2021) 0.00 
    0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.1, S.11-27
  12. Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 1 : conceptual design (2021) 0.00 
    0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=700,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  13. Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 2 : usability evaluation (2021) 0.00 
    0.004893632 = product of:
  0.02446816 = sum of:
    0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02446816 = score(doc=714,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on usability evaluation that was carried out to evaluate the LRM-based prototype interface, presented in Part 1. A combination of focus group, Wizard of Oz method, and think-aloud protocol was used. The study was conducted in May 2019 with seven Slovenian catalogers from Maribor Public Library. Although participants had some difficulties understanding the LRM model, the user interface proved to be quite easy to use, quick to understand, and transparent. The functionality of the proposed prototype proved to be adequate, since the catalogers successfully and independently completed all the tasks without major problems and errors.
  14. Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM)-harmonisation of the FRBR family (2018) 0.00 
    0.004194542 = product of:
  0.020972708 = sum of:
    0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020972708 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 8.2018 12:26:17
  15. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004) 0.00 
    0.003954652 = product of:
  0.01977326 = sum of:
    0.01977326 = weight(_text_:1 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01977326 = score(doc=2646,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.15353142 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.
  16. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Extending models for controlled vocabularies to classification systems : modeling DDC with FRSAD (2011) 0.00 
    0.0034954515 = product of:
  0.017477257 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 9.2011 20:10:43
  17. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 1: mental models of descriptions (2010) 0.00 
    0.0034954515 = product of:
  0.017477257 = sum of:
    0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 4145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017477257 = score(doc=4145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 4145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4145)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Takhirov, N.; Aalberg, T.; Duchateau, F.; Zumer, M.: FRBR-ML: a FRBR-based framework for semantic interoperability (2012) 0.00 
    0.002796361 = product of:
  0.013981805 = sum of:
    0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013981805 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Semantic Web journal. 3(2012) no.1, S.23-43
  19. Doerr, M.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR entities : identity and identification (2012) 0.00 
    0.002796361 = product of:
  0.013981805 = sum of:
    0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 1917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013981805 = score(doc=1917,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 1917, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1917)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The models in the FRBR family include ways to document names or terms for all entities defined in the models, with identification as the ultimate aim, i.e., to distinguish entities by unique appellations and to use the most reliable appellations for entities in a given context. The intention in this paper is to explore the interrelationships between these different models with regards to their treatment of names, identifiers and other appellation entities. The specialisation/generalisation structure of the appellation-related entities and the relationships and properties of these entities will be discussed. The paper also tries to clarify the potential confusion of identity itself in this context - when are we talking about an entity via its name, about the name itself, about the name citation in a document and when about a name of name? In FRBR(er), titles for group 1, names for group 2 and terms for group 3 entities are merely defined as attributes of these entities. This serves the basic requirement of associating the appellation (label) with the entity, but does not allow introducing attributes of these appellations or relationships between and among them. FRAD, completed a decade later, defined as entities name, identifier, and controlled access point. Clearly making the distinction between a bibliographic entity and its name is a significant step taken in FRAD. This permits the separate treatment of relationships between the persons, families, and corporate bodies themselves and those relationships which instead operate between their names or between the controlled access points based on those names. In FRSAD, the most recent model, two entities are defined, Thema and Nomen. Again, the bibliographic entity is distinguished from the full range of its appellations. The FRBRoo model expanded on the treatment of appellations and identifiers in CRM by modeling the identifier assignment process. In FRBRoo, F12 Name was defined but identified with the existing CRM entity E41 Appellation. Current development is concentrating on integrating FRAD and FRSAD concepts into FRBRoo, and this is putting a focus on naming and appellations, causing new classes and properties to be defined, and requiring a re-evaluation of some of the decisions previously made in FRBRoo. As naming and appellations are such a significant feature of the FRBR family of conceptual models, this work is an important step in towards the consolidation of the models into a single coherent statement of the bibliographic universe.
  20. Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: Introducing the FRBR library reference model (2015) 0.00 
    0.002796361 = product of:
  0.013981805 = sum of:
    0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013981805 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052428056 = queryNorm
        0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://library.ifla.org/1084/1/207-riva-en.pdf

Authors

Years

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications