Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"fi"
  1. Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992) 0.02
    0.017047867 = product of:
      0.085239336 = sum of:
        0.085239336 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085239336 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:39
  2. Kautto, V.: Kirjojen sisallonkuvailun vaatima aika (1993) 0.01
    0.005592722 = product of:
      0.02796361 = sum of:
        0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 1598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02796361 = score(doc=1598,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 1598, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1598)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Signum. 26(1993) no.1, S.11-14
  3. Tuominen, K.: Modernin ihmiskuva tiedonhankintatutkimuksessa : esimerkkitapauksena Carol C. Kuhlthaun konstruktistinen tiedonhankinnan teoria (1995) 0.00
    0.004194542 = product of:
      0.020972708 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 3668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=3668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 3668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3668)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Kirjastotiede ja informatiika. 14(1995) no.1, S.3-14
  4. Leppanen, E.: Homografiongelma tekstihaussa ja homografien disambiguoinnin vaikutukset (1996) 0.00
    0.004194542 = product of:
      0.020972708 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Homonymy is known to often cause false drops in free text searching in a full text database. The problem is quite common and difficult to avoid in Finnish, but nobody has examined it before. Reports on a study that examined the frequency of, and solutions to, the homonymy problem, based on searches made in a Finnish full text database containing about 55.000 newspaper articles. The results indicate that homonymy is not a very serious problem in full text searching, with only about 1 search result set out of 4 containing false drops caused by homonymy. Several other reasons for nonrelevance were much more common. However, in some set results there were a considerable number of homonymy errors, so the number seems to be very random. A study was also made into whether homonyms can be disambiguated by syntactic analysis. The result was that 75,2% of homonyms were disambiguated by this method. Verb homonyms were considerably easier to disambiguate than substantives. Although homonymy is not a very big problem it could perhaps easily be eliminated if there was a suitable syntactic analyzer in the IR system