-
Laakso, J.; Puukko, O.: Classification of fiction by topic in the light of experiments carried out in two public libraries : [Original in Finnisch] (1992)
0.02
0.017047867 = product of:
0.085239336 = sum of:
0.085239336 = weight(_text_:22 in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085239336 = score(doc=4155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 10:22:39
-
Kautto, V.: Kirjojen sisallonkuvailun vaatima aika (1993)
0.01
0.005592722 = product of:
0.02796361 = sum of:
0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 1598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02796361 = score(doc=1598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 1598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1598)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Signum. 26(1993) no.1, S.11-14
-
Tuominen, K.: Modernin ihmiskuva tiedonhankintatutkimuksessa : esimerkkitapauksena Carol C. Kuhlthaun konstruktistinen tiedonhankinnan teoria (1995)
0.00
0.004194542 = product of:
0.020972708 = sum of:
0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 3668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020972708 = score(doc=3668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 3668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3668)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Kirjastotiede ja informatiika. 14(1995) no.1, S.3-14
-
Leppanen, E.: Homografiongelma tekstihaussa ja homografien disambiguoinnin vaikutukset (1996)
0.00
0.004194542 = product of:
0.020972708 = sum of:
0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020972708 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Homonymy is known to often cause false drops in free text searching in a full text database. The problem is quite common and difficult to avoid in Finnish, but nobody has examined it before. Reports on a study that examined the frequency of, and solutions to, the homonymy problem, based on searches made in a Finnish full text database containing about 55.000 newspaper articles. The results indicate that homonymy is not a very serious problem in full text searching, with only about 1 search result set out of 4 containing false drops caused by homonymy. Several other reasons for nonrelevance were much more common. However, in some set results there were a considerable number of homonymy errors, so the number seems to be very random. A study was also made into whether homonyms can be disambiguated by syntactic analysis. The result was that 75,2% of homonyms were disambiguated by this method. Verb homonyms were considerably easier to disambiguate than substantives. Although homonymy is not a very big problem it could perhaps easily be eliminated if there was a suitable syntactic analyzer in the IR system