-
Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971)
0.05
0.0508739 = product of:
0.12718475 = sum of:
0.041945416 = weight(_text_:1 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041945416 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.085239336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085239336 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.03
0.029676441 = product of:
0.0741911 = sum of:
0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02446816 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049722943 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
- Source
- European journal of cognitive psychology. 6(1994) no.1, S.43-75
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.03
0.02543695 = product of:
0.063592374 = sum of:
0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020972708 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042619668 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.libreas.eu/09treude.htm. Bezug zu: Alon Friedman, Richard P. Smiraglia, (2013): Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69/1, S.27-48.
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.02
0.024093186 = product of:
0.060232963 = sum of:
0.024716575 = weight(_text_:1 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024716575 = score(doc=33,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551639 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The concept of concept has seldom been examined in its entirety, and the term very seldom defined. The rigidity, or lack thereof, and the homogeneity, or lack thereof, of concepts, are only two of their characteristics that have been debated. These issues are reviewed in this paper, namely: 1) does a concept represent its referent(s), or is it a free creation of the mind?; 2) can a concept be analyzed in parts or elements?; 3) must a concept be general, i.e., refer to a category or a type, or can it refer to a single object, physical or mental?; 4) are concepts as clearly delimited as terms are? Are concepts voiceless terms?; and, 5) what do terms contribute to an individual's and a community's conceptual richness? As regards the relationship of concepts with their referents in the stage of formation, it seems reasonable to conclude that said relationship may be close in some concepts, less close in others, and lacking altogether in some cases. The set of elements of a concept, which varies from individual to individual and across time inside the same individual, is called the intension of a concept. The set of referents of a concept is called the extension of that concept. Most concepts don't have a clearly delimited extension: their referents form a fuzzy set. The aspects of a concept's intension form a scale of generality. A concept is not equal to the term that describes it; rather, many terms are joined to concepts. Language, therefore, renders a gamut of services to the development, consolidation, and communication of conceptual richness.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.29-54
-
Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002)
0.02
0.021197459 = product of:
0.052993648 = sum of:
0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017477257 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551639 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A main goal of recent studies in semantics is to integrate into conceptual structures the models of representation used in linguistics, logic, and/or artificial intelligence. A fundamental problem resides in the need to structure knowledge and then to check the validity of constructed representations. We propose associating logical properties with relationships by introducing the relationships into a typed and functional system of specifcations. This makes it possible to compare conceptual representations against the relationships established between the concepts. The mandatory condition to validate such a conceptual representation is consistency. The semantic system proposed is based an a structured set of semantic primitives-types, relations, and properties-based an a global model of language processing, Applicative and Cognitive Grammar (ACG) (Desc16s, 1990), and an extension of this model to terminology (Jouis & Mustafa 1995, 1996, 1997). The ACG postulates three levels of representation of languages, including a cognitive level. At this level, the meanings of lexical predicates are represented by semantic cognitive schemes. From this perspective, we propose a set of semantic concepts, which defines an organized system of meanings. Relations are part of a specification network based an a general terminological scheure (i.e., a coherent system of meanings of relations). In such a system, a specific relation may be characterized as to its: (1) functional type (the semantic type of arguments of the relation); (2) algebraic properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, etc.); and (3) combinatorial relations with other entities in the same context (for instance, the part of the text where a concept is defined).
- Date
- 1.12.2002 11:12:22
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.02
0.021197459 = product of:
0.052993648 = sum of:
0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017477257 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03551639 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to analyze the Gottlob Frege's (1848-1925) theory of definition as a tool for knowledge organization. The objective was achieved by discussing the theory of definition including: the aims of definition, kinds of definition, condition of correct definition, what is undefinable. Frege indicated the following aims of a defining: (1) to introduce a new word, which has had no precise meaning until then (2) to explain the meaning of a word; (3) to catch a thought. We would like to present three kinds of definitions used by Frege: a contextual definition, a stipulative definition and a piecemeal definition. In the history of theory of definition Frege was the first to have formulated the condition of a correct definition. According to Frege not everything can be defined, what is logically simple cannot have a proper definition Usability of Frege's theory of definition is referred in the case study. Definitions that serve as an example are definitions of 'context'. The term 'context' is used in different situations and meanings in the field of knowledge organization. The paper is rounded by a discussion of how Frege's theory of definition can be useful for knowledge organization. To present G. Frege's theory of definition in view of the need for knowledge organization we shall start with different ranges of knowledge organization.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.02
0.019889178 = product of:
0.09944589 = sum of:
0.09944589 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09944589 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Principles of semantic networks : explorations in the representation of knowledge (1991)
0.01
0.0121086 = product of:
0.060542997 = sum of:
0.060542997 = weight(_text_:1 in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060542997 = score(doc=1677,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.47009206 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Enthält 3 thematische Sektionen: (1) Issues in knowledge representation; (2) formal analyses; (3) systems for knowledge representation
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization. 20(1993) no.1, S.60-61 (O. Sechser)
- Isbn
- 1-55860-088-4
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.01
0.011365245 = product of:
0.056826223 = sum of:
0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056826223 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Jahr, S.: Zum Verhältnis von Bedeutung, Begriff und Wissen bei Fachtermini (1993)
0.01
0.011185444 = product of:
0.05592722 = sum of:
0.05592722 = weight(_text_:1 in 6328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05592722 = score(doc=6328,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 6328, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6328)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Fachsprache. 15(1993) H.1-2, S.38-44
-
Zawada, B.; Swanepoel, P.: On the empirical adequacy of terminological concept theories : the case for prototype theory (1994)
0.01
0.011185444 = product of:
0.05592722 = sum of:
0.05592722 = weight(_text_:1 in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05592722 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Terminology. 1(1994) no.2, S.253-275
-
Cabré, M.T.: Do we need an autonomous theory of terms? (1999)
0.01
0.011185444 = product of:
0.05592722 = sum of:
0.05592722 = weight(_text_:1 in 6289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05592722 = score(doc=6289,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 6289, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6289)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Terminology. 5(1998/1999) no.1, S.5-19
-
Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006)
0.01
0.009944589 = product of:
0.049722943 = sum of:
0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049722943 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Pages
- S.22-33
-
Mental images in human cognition (1991)
0.01
0.009787264 = product of:
0.04893632 = sum of:
0.04893632 = weight(_text_:1 in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04893632 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library quarterly 63(1993) no.1, S.108-110.
-
Sager, J.C.; Ndi-Kimbi, A.: ¬The conceptual structure of terminological definitions and their realisations : a report on research in progress (1995)
0.01
0.009787264 = product of:
0.04893632 = sum of:
0.04893632 = weight(_text_:1 in 7579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04893632 = score(doc=7579,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 7579, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7579)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Terminology. 2(1995) no.1, S.61-81
-
Sager, J.C.; L'Homme, M.-C.: ¬A model for the definition of concepts : rules for analytical definitions in terminological databases (1994)
0.01
0.009787264 = product of:
0.04893632 = sum of:
0.04893632 = weight(_text_:1 in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04893632 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Terminology. 1(1994) no.2, S.351-373
-
Bühl, W.L.: ¬Das Konzil der Lexikographen (1996)
0.01
0.009787264 = product of:
0.04893632 = sum of:
0.04893632 = weight(_text_:1 in 3916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04893632 = score(doc=3916,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 3916, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3916)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.16-18
-
Hahn, A.: Begriffe, Konzeptionen und Beispiele (1996)
0.01
0.009787264 = product of:
0.04893632 = sum of:
0.04893632 = weight(_text_:1 in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04893632 = score(doc=3922,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.28-30
-
Kerber, H.: Begriffskultur als Ordnung? (1996)
0.01
0.009787264 = product of:
0.04893632 = sum of:
0.04893632 = weight(_text_:1 in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04893632 = score(doc=3923,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.30-32
-
Kleinknecht, H.: ¬Eine analytische Begriffstheorie? (1996)
0.01
0.009787264 = product of:
0.04893632 = sum of:
0.04893632 = weight(_text_:1 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04893632 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.052428056 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.32-33
