Search (165 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.06
    0.059352882 = product of:
      0.1483822 = sum of:
        0.04893632 = weight(_text_:1 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04893632 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
        0.09944589 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09944589 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.1, S.39-46
  2. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.03
    0.033915933 = product of:
      0.084789835 = sum of:
        0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02796361 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
        0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056826223 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 56(2009) H.1, S.9-19
  3. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.03
    0.03373046 = product of:
      0.08432615 = sum of:
        0.034603205 = weight(_text_:1 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034603205 = score(doc=1795,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.26867998 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
        0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049722943 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a recently composite view of several user studies in information retrieval. Contains personal conclusions and speculations based on these studies, rather than formal statistical results, which so often are not comparable from 1 experiment to another. Suggests a taxonomy of user characteristics for such studies, in order to make results comparable. Discusses methods and effects of user training, then manner of expression of a query or information need, conduct of a search, use of the system command language or its equivalent, analysis by the user of retrieved information, and user satisfaction with outcome. Concludes with suggestions for system design and experimental methodology
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22
  4. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.03
    0.029676441 = product of:
      0.0741911 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049722943 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
  5. Agosto, D.E.: Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making (2002) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigated Simon's behavioral decisionmaking theories of bounded rationality and satisficing in relation to young people's decision making in the World Wide Web, and considered the role of personal preferences in Web-based decisions. It employed a qualitative research methodology involving group interviews with 22 adolescent females. Data analysis took the form of iterative pattern coding using QSR NUD*IST Vivo qualitative data analysis software. Data analysis revealed that the study participants did operate within the limits of bounded rationality. These limits took the form of time constraints, information overload, and physical constraints. Data analysis also uncovered two major satisficing behaviors-reduction and termination. Personal preference was found to play a major role in Web site evaluation in the areas of graphic/multimedia and subject content preferences. This study has related implications for Web site designers and for adult intermediaries who work with young people and the Web
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.1, S.16-27
  6. Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011) 0.02
    0.021197459 = product of:
      0.052993648 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
        0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03551639 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The development of visual retrieval methods requires information about user interaction with images, including their description and categorization. This article presents the development of a categorization model for magazine images based on two user studies. In Study 1, we elicited 10 main classes of magazine image categorization criteria through sorting tasks with nonexpert and expert users (N=30). Multivariate methods, namely, multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering, were used to analyze similarity data. Content analysis of category names gave rise to classes that were synthesized into a categorization framework. The framework was evaluated in Study 2 by experts (N=24) who categorized another set of images consistent with the framework and found it to be useful in the task. Based on the evaluation study the framework was solidified into a model for categorizing magazine imagery. Connections between classes were analyzed both from the original sorting data and from the evaluation study and included into the final model. The model is a practical categorization tool that may be used in workplaces, such as magazine editorial offices. It may also serve to guide the development of computational methods for image understanding, selection of concepts for automatic detection, and approaches to support browsing and exploratory image search.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:09:26
  7. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.02
    0.021197459 = product of:
      0.052993648 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
        0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03551639 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.1, S.13-24
  8. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.019889178 = product of:
      0.09944589 = sum of:
        0.09944589 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09944589 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  9. Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008) 0.02
    0.017047867 = product of:
      0.085239336 = sum of:
        0.085239336 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085239336 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:52:22
  10. Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999) 0.02
    0.016957967 = product of:
      0.042394917 = sum of:
        0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013981805 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
        0.028413111 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028413111 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:51:28
  11. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.02
    0.016957967 = product of:
      0.042394917 = sum of:
        0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013981805 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
        0.028413111 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028413111 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.2-26
  12. Kern-Simirenko, C.: OPAC user logs : implications for bibliographic instruction (1983) 0.02
    0.015818609 = product of:
      0.07909304 = sum of:
        0.07909304 = weight(_text_:1 in 5260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07909304 = score(doc=5260,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.61412567 = fieldWeight in 5260, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5260)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 1(1983) no.1, S.27-35
  13. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01
    0.011365245 = product of:
      0.056826223 = sum of:
        0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056826223 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  14. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.01
    0.011365245 = product of:
      0.056826223 = sum of:
        0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056826223 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  15. Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006) 0.01
    0.011365245 = product of:
      0.056826223 = sum of:
        0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056826223 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:17:44
  16. Fidel, R.: Searchers' selection of search keys : 1. The selection routine (1991) 0.01
    0.011185444 = product of:
      0.05592722 = sum of:
        0.05592722 = weight(_text_:1 in 2993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05592722 = score(doc=2993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 2993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2993)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  17. Tolle, J.: Current utilisation of online catalogs : transaction log analysis: final report to the Council on Library Resources (1983) 0.01
    0.011185444 = product of:
      0.05592722 = sum of:
        0.05592722 = weight(_text_:1 in 3907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05592722 = score(doc=3907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 3907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3907)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Issue
    Vol.1.
  18. Fischer-Knappe, D.: Recherchen an Sachkatalogen (1984) 0.01
    0.011185444 = product of:
      0.05592722 = sum of:
        0.05592722 = weight(_text_:1 in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05592722 = score(doc=4384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.4342524 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Benutzung von Katalogen und Freihandbeständen in deutschen Universalbibliotheken. Bd.1
  19. Kaske, N.K.: ¬A comparative study of subject searching in an OPAC among branch libraries of a university library system (1988) 0.01
    0.009944589 = product of:
      0.049722943 = sum of:
        0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049722943 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The degree of variability in the percentage of subject searching in an online public access catalog (OPAC) among branch libraries of one university was studied. A full semester's worth of transactions was analyzed, not sampled. The time units used were hour of the day, day of the week, and week of the semester. The findings show that subject searching varies from a low of 22% to a high of 74% over the hours of a day. Variability for the days of the week ranged from 17% to 64%, and for the weeks of the semester variability ranged from 12% to 70%. Valuable management information on the utilization of the OPAC within each brach library and among all the branch libraries is provided through numerous charts and graphs.
  20. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01
    0.009944589 = product of:
      0.049722943 = sum of:
        0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049722943 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71

Years

Languages

  • e 146
  • d 16
  • f 1
  • ja 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 156
  • r 4
  • m 3
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…