Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  2. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.017047867 = product of:
      0.085239336 = sum of:
        0.085239336 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085239336 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  3. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.010045552 = product of:
      0.050227758 = sum of:
        0.050227758 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050227758 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.01
    0.009944589 = product of:
      0.049722943 = sum of:
        0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049722943 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  5. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.01
    0.007103278 = product of:
      0.03551639 = sum of:
        0.03551639 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03551639 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  6. Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012) 0.01
    0.0059319776 = product of:
      0.029659888 = sum of:
        0.029659888 = weight(_text_:1 in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029659888 = score(doc=309,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23029712 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 7.2012 14:03:46
    1. 7.2012 19:09:20
  7. Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007) 0.01
    0.0056826225 = product of:
      0.028413111 = sum of:
        0.028413111 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028413111 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  8. Peterson, E.: Parallel systems : the coexistence of subject cataloging and folksonomy (2008) 0.00
    0.004893632 = product of:
      0.02446816 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library philosophy & Practice (Annual volume 2008), S.1-5
  9. Spiteri, L.F.: Incorporating facets into social tagging applications : an analysis of current trends (2010) 0.00
    0.004893632 = product of:
      0.02446816 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=3561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 48(2010) no.1, S.94-109
  10. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : nutzergenerierte Schlagwörter als Indexierungswerkzeug für die Massen (2011) 0.00
    0.004893632 = product of:
      0.02446816 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 4909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=4909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 4909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4909)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Inhalt 1. Zur Notwendigkeit der Inhaltserschließung im Web 2.0 2. Funktion und Nutzen von Folksonomies 3. Folksonomies in Bibliotheken 4. Danksagung
  11. Munk, T.B.; Mork, K.: Folksonomy, the power law & the significance of the least effort (2007) 0.00
    0.0034954515 = product of:
      0.017477257 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 34(2007) no.1, S.16-33
  12. Munk, T.B.; Moerk, K.: Folksonomies, tagging communities, and tagging strategies : an empirical study (2007) 0.00
    0.0034954515 = product of:
      0.017477257 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=1091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The subject of this article is folksonomies on the Internet. One of the largest folksonomies on the Internet in terms of number of users and tagged websites is the computer program del.icio.us, where more than 100,000 people have tagged the websites that they and others find using their own keywords. How this is done in practice and the patterns to be found are the focus of this article. The empirical basis is the collection of 76,601 different keywords with a total frequency of 178,215 from 500 randomly chosen taggers on del.icio.us at the end of 2005. The keywords collected were then analyzed quantitatively statistically by uncovering their frequency and percentage distribution and through a statistical correspondence analysis in order to uncover possible patterns in the users' tags. Subsequently, a qualitative textual analysis of the tags was made in order to find out by analysis which tagging strategies are represented in the data material. This led to four conclusions. 1) the distribution of keywords follows classic power law; 2) distinct tagging communities are identifiable; 3) the most frequently used tags are situated on a general-specific axis; and 4) nine distinct tagging strategies are observed. These four conclusions are put into perspective collectively in respect of a number of more general and theoretical considerations concerning folksonomies and the classification systems of the future.
  13. Sauperl, A.: UDC and Folksonomies (2010) 0.00
    0.0034954515 = product of:
      0.017477257 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Social tagging systems, known as "folksonomies," represent an important part of web resource discovery as they enable free and unrestricted browsing through information space. Folksonomies consisting of subject designators (tags) assigned by users, however, have one important drawback: they do not express semantic relationships, either hierarchical or associative, between tags. As a consequence, the use of tags to browse information resources requires moving from one resource to another, based on coincidence and not on the pre-established meaningful or logical connections that may exist between related resources. We suggest that the semantic structure of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) may be used in complementing and supporting tag-based browsing. In this work, two specific questions were investigated: 1) Are terms used as tags in folksonomies included in the UDC?; and, 2) Which facets of UDC match the characteristics of documents or information objects that are tagged in folksonomies? A collection of the most popular tags from Amazon, LibraryThing, Delicious, and 43Things was investigated. The universal nature of UDC was examined through the universality of topics and facets covering diverse human interests which are at the same time interconnected and form a rich and intricate semantic structure. The results suggest that UDC-supported folksonomies could be implemented in resource discovery, in particular in library portals and catalogues.
  14. Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011) 0.00
    0.0034954515 = product of:
      0.017477257 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a conceptual framework to recast a folksonomy as a Web classification and to use this to explore the ways in which people work with it in assessing, sharing, and navigating Web resources. The author uses information scent and foraging theory as a context to discuss how folksonomy is constructed through interactions among users, a folksonomic system, and a given domain that consists of a group of users who share the same interest or goals. The discussion centers on two dimensions of folksonomies: (1) folksonomy as a Web classification which puts like information together in a Web context; and (2) folksonomy as information scent which helps users to find related resources and users, and obtain desired information. This paper aims to integrate these two dimensions with a conceptual framework that addresses the structure of a folksonomy shaped by users' interactions. A proposed framework consists of three components of users' interactions with a folksonomy: (a) tagging - cognitive categorization of Web accessible resources by an individual user; (b) navigation - exploration and discovery of Web accessible resources in the folksonomic system; and (c) knowledge sharing - representation and communication of knowledge within a domain. This understanding will help us motivate possible future directions of research in folksonomy. This initial framework will frame a number of research questions and help lay the groundwork for future empirical research which focuses on qualitative analysis of a folksonomy and users' tagging behaviors.
  15. Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010) 0.00
    0.0034954515 = product of:
      0.017477257 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 28(2010) no.1, S.81-93
  16. Johansson, S.; Golub, K.: LibraryThing for libraries : how tag moderation and size limitations affect tag clouds (2019) 0.00
    0.0034954515 = product of:
      0.017477257 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=5398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 7.2019 18:49:14
  17. Trant, J.: Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums : proof of concept (2006) 0.00
    0.002796361 = product of:
      0.013981805 = sum of:
        0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 5900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013981805 = score(doc=5900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 5900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5900)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    New review of hypermedia and multimedia. 12(2006) no.1, S.83-105
  18. Xie, H.; Li, X.; Wang, T.; Lau, R.Y.K.; Wong, T.-L.; Chen, L.; Wang, F.L.; Li, Q.: Incorporating sentiment into tag-based user profiles and resource profiles for personalized search in folksonomy (2016) 0.00
    0.002796361 = product of:
      0.013981805 = sum of:
        0.013981805 = weight(_text_:1 in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013981805 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.1085631 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.1, S.61-72