Search (376 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.07
    0.06746092 = product of:
      0.1686523 = sum of:
        0.06920641 = weight(_text_:1 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06920641 = score(doc=5666,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.53735995 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
        0.09944589 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09944589 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
    Isbn
    1-56024-852-1
  2. Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015) 0.04
    0.038549095 = product of:
      0.09637274 = sum of:
        0.03954652 = weight(_text_:1 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03954652 = score(doc=4654,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.30706283 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
        0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056826223 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 17:12:50
    Isbn
    978-1-57387-499-1
  3. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.04
    0.03684122 = product of:
      0.09210305 = sum of:
        0.042380102 = weight(_text_:1 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042380102 = score(doc=900,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.32906446 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
        0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049722943 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Eine englische Version dieses Beitrags erscheint unter dem Titel "International visibility of European and in particular German language publications in library and information science" im Tagungsband des 13. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013). Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-1/iwp-2013-0001/iwp-2013-0001.xml?format=INT.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.1-8
  4. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.03
    0.033915933 = product of:
      0.084789835 = sum of:
        0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02796361 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
        0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056826223 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
    Source
    IASLIC bulletin. 41(1996) no.1, S.37-38
  5. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.03
    0.033915933 = product of:
      0.084789835 = sum of:
        0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02796361 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
        0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056826223 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
    Source
    Scientometrics. 42(1998) no.1, S.89-95
  6. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.03
    0.033915933 = product of:
      0.084789835 = sum of:
        0.02796361 = weight(_text_:1 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02796361 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
        0.056826223 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056826223 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
    Source
    Scientometrics. 42(1998) no.1, S.41-60
  7. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.03
    0.029676441 = product of:
      0.0741911 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
        0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049722943 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
    Source
    Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
  8. Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997) 0.03
    0.029676441 = product of:
      0.0741911 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049722943 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1. 3.1997 19:57:52
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
  9. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.03
    0.029676441 = product of:
      0.0741911 = sum of:
        0.02446816 = weight(_text_:1 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02446816 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
        0.049722943 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049722943 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    I studied the factors (citations, self-citations, and number of articles) that influenced large changes in only 1 year in the impact factors (IFs) of journals. A set of 360 instances of journals with large increases or decreases in their IFs from a given year to the following was selected from journals in the Journal Citation Reports from 1998 to 2007 (40 journals each year). The main factor influencing large changes was the change in the number of citations. About 54% of the increases and 42% of the decreases in the journal IFs were associated with changes in the journal self-citations.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
  10. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.03
    0.027082006 = product of:
      0.06770501 = sum of:
        0.017477257 = weight(_text_:1 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017477257 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
        0.050227758 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050227758 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.27-54
  11. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1. 3.1997 19:57:52
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  12. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 59(2003) no.1, S.84-104
  13. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
  14. Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    23. 2.2009 18:22:28
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.1, S.27-34
  15. Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.1, S.40-49
  16. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  17. Kumar, S.: Co-authorship networks : a review of the literature (2015) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=2586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 2586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=2586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2586)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.55-73
  18. Ridenour, L.: Boundary objects : measuring gaps and overlap between research areas (2016) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.1, S.44-55
  19. Lorentzen, D.G.: Bridging polarised Twitter discussions : the interactions of the users in the middle (2021) 0.03
    0.02543695 = product of:
      0.063592374 = sum of:
        0.020972708 = weight(_text_:1 in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020972708 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12878966 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
        0.042619668 = weight(_text_:22 in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042619668 = score(doc=182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 73(2021) no.1, S.129-143
  20. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.02
    0.02273049 = product of:
      0.113652445 = sum of:
        0.113652445 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113652445 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18359412 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052428056 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419

Years

Languages

  • e 333
  • d 39
  • ? 1
  • ro 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 352
  • m 13
  • s 11
  • el 6
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…